No, I’m saying that at this point you aren’t actually engaging in discussion. You’re being a broken record and contributing nothing.
If you disagree, answer a few questions:
1. Where in Scripture does it indicate that a living human being ever exists without a soul?
2. Can you admit that at the very least, it is apparent that based on Luke 1,John the Baptist, while still in his mother’s womb had a soul? If not, how is it you think a human being who both lept for joy and was filled with the Holy Spirit didn’t have a soul?
3. Your repetition of your uncertainty of when God puts a soul in a human implies that you believe humans without souls can be aborted without moral considerations, but human beings with souls shouldn’t be aborted, right?
If that’s the case, if you’re uncertain about when a human received a soul, why wouldn’t you err on the side of protecting the unborn human? I mean seriously, what if God does give humans a soul the moment they come into existence (which seems logical)?