Investigative Judgment (Seventh day Adventists)

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

You did not post the verses from Matthew 16 or from Romans 11.

I do not see anything in either production that would negate OSAS.

You want and asked for us to speak to your Bible verse but you are not posting those verses.

Remember....…..assumption is not Bible exegesis!
 
Upvote 0

YeshuaFan

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2018
3,003
996
63
Macomb
✟56,324.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
He is assuming that actual saved persons are getting "broken off"
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I prefer to stay with the topic of the thread - and to continue pointing out what the Bible says - even if someone does not want to read that part of the Bible.

I do not blame you my friend. I would not want to accept what a woman taught over what God teaches.
 
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Hello Bob.

You said.
Daniel 7 (which apparently you are not reading) says that in the courtroom are the "myriads and myriads" of sinless beings. And that "the court sat and the books were opened"..
I read that text (Daniel 7:10), where does that verse say 'sinless beings'. May I ask what translation your reading from?
 
Upvote 0

YeshuaFan

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2018
3,003
996
63
Macomb
✟56,324.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Hello Bob.

You said.

I read that text (Daniel 7:10), where does that verse say 'sinless beings'. May I ask what translation your reading from?
Christians appear before the judgment seat of Christ, not what he is describing!
 
Upvote 0

YeshuaFan

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2018
3,003
996
63
Macomb
✟56,324.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
You have it backwards and represented incorrectly.

It is:

God's Grace (through faith) to keep God's law in loving obedience.

In other words

Saved to Serve.
What Law are we to keep than? Which of the 489 parts of it?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

liberty of conscience

created anew
Dec 3, 2018
374
125
Visistate
Visit site
✟12,005.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
ALL saved stand before Jesus, give an account of our lives after salvation to Him, for the purpose of eternal rewards or losses, NONE lose eternal life there!

You placed an "apriori" in the first two words. You begged the question.
 
Upvote 0

liberty of conscience

created anew
Dec 3, 2018
374
125
Visistate
Visit site
✟12,005.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

liberty of conscience

created anew
Dec 3, 2018
374
125
Visistate
Visit site
✟12,005.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Amazing that Sda just cannot see past the false doctrines of their prophetess!

You are simply accusing, without demonstrating evidence:

Mat_12:36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.

You are warned in scripture to not do what you are doing.
 
Upvote 0

liberty of conscience

created anew
Dec 3, 2018
374
125
Visistate
Visit site
✟12,005.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If you choose to do that, would you still be saved or not?

Any person that chooses against known light, can only end up walking in darkness.

Joh_3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.


Read the verse carefully, for it is for us all.
 
Upvote 0

liberty of conscience

created anew
Dec 3, 2018
374
125
Visistate
Visit site
✟12,005.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I was just saying that you have NO opinions on scripture other than what EW said!

First of all, any man's "opinions" (including the one you just gave) is irrelevant, as per scripture (Psalms 118:9, 146:3), since all of scripture is interpreted by God (Psalms 40:8; 2 Peter 1:20; Isaiah 28:10,13).

Secondly, you have assumed by your misinformed apriori that what sister White said is in contradiction to what is written in scripture (KJB). I can assure you it is not by any means, having read the material and tested as scripture commands that I do. She is to be tested as any prophet/messenger before her, like Paul, Daniel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, etc.

Thirdly, you have given 0 (zero, nada, nothing, zip, ziltch, bubkiss, vanity) evidence for what you are personally (subjectively) claiming in regards sister White and scripture, and before you ramble off some list you found online, I would suggest you personally look at each claim carefully, otherwise you will look the fool very shortly if you post said material without such due prayerful consideration.

Fourthly, that sister White disagrees with 'you' or your 'pastor' is not evidence that she is in disagreement with scripture, for that would be a false equative, for 'you' and your 'theology' (which carries much of Roman Catholic doctrine in it, I can demonstrate upon request) are not the standard of truth, scripture is.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

liberty of conscience

created anew
Dec 3, 2018
374
125
Visistate
Visit site
✟12,005.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Amazing that Sda just cannot see past the false doctrines of their prophetess!

You sure do like to 'run' at the mouth without substance (remember, you are to give account for every word). Mayhap you need to get some Holy Spirit imodium for that 'issue'.

If you could please stick to actual documented facts please. It would be less clutter on the forum, and more closely related to the actual OP and material presented in response. You do have a response for what was presented right?

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
He wants to keep saying that "my" 1689 Baptist Confession of faith supports his views, !

Since my view is that the TEN Commandments are in the moral law of God written on the heart under the NEW Covenant - and this is exactly what "Baptist Confession of Faith" as expanded by C.H. Spurgeon in the 1800's also admits.

Read it.

But his view on what actually it means now under the NC to keep the Sabbath agrees with me, not you!

So then "instead of just me posting it" -- YOU also go around insisting that "ALL TEN of the Ten commandments are included in the moral law of God written on the heart under the NEW Covenant"??

YOU also post that the 7th day Bible Sabbath began in Eden and applied to all mankind from the very start???

Seriously? You are asking us to believe that?

The BCoF argues that the 4th commandment starts off in Eden as the actual 7th day Sabbath -- but then gets "bent" to point to week-day-1... but other than that it is unchanged.. and THIS is what YOU have also been posting?? Seriously? you can point us to one of your posts doing that??

Jesus accomplished in the new covenant what the old covenant was not adequate to do – defeat sin.

The old covenant proved that sin was more powerful than the law.

Less creative writing - more Bible please.

The Law was never given as a means of victory over sin. There is no such thing as "sin more powerful than the law".

And of course Moses and Elijah stand with Christ - in glory -- in Matthew 17 -- before the cross.

Because the "one Gospel" of Gal 1:6-9 was "preached to us just as it was to them also" Hebrews 4:1

In any case - the post that you say you are responding to is one where I congratulate someone who ostensibly is claiming to affirm the "Baptist Confession of Faith"[/QUOTE]
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I would say in responce to your long post that the Bible teaches that Christ's atonement on the cross has perfected (past tense)


Read the actual Bible.

1 John 2:2 - "Christ is the atoning SACRIFICE for our sins and not for our sins only but for the sins of the whole world".

Notice that in Lev 16 "DAY of Atonement" God says that BOTH the work of Christ as "lamb of God" (sin offering) AND the Work of Christ as High Priest ("the MAIN point" Hebrews 8:1) are required for the full Gospel scope of the term "Atonement" to be addressed.

Bible details matter.

You seem to be desiring a need for Bible study and exegesis as you keep telling us to Read the Bible.

Wonderful. Lets do just that Bob.

Its like pulling teeth trying to get someone to finally give that response to a point... I sincerely thank you for being willing to go there sans all the ad hominem.


Vs 1 changes nothing in vs 2.

My dear children, I write this to you so that you will not sin. But if anybody does sin, we have an advocate with the Father—Jesus Christ, the Righteous One. 2 He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.(NIV)


The Lev 16 teaching of God on the topic of "Day of Atonement" most certainly teaches that the "Atoning Sacrifice" that is paid by the "Sin offering" - the "Lord's Goat" as God calls in in Lev 16 -- provides satisfaction for the debt owed in terms of fully meeting the penalty demanded by the law.

That is not the point where we differ.

Where we differ is on the "main point" as the NT writers call it -- in Hebrews 8:1.

As for "Atoning Sacrifice"

--------------------------




Hilasmos g2434

  1. an appeasing, propitiating
  2. the means of appeasing, a propitiation

B. Classical
1. Liddel and Scott (Greek-English Lexicon Revised, page 828):
2. The noun hilasmos is derived from the verb hilaskomai.
3. This word is rare in classical Greek and appears mainly in late writings.

C. LXX

1. The noun hilasmos appears only five times in the canonical portions of the LXX and three times in the apocryphal writings.
2. It is used to translate Hebrew kippurim (syr!P|K!), which is the plural form of the noun kippur.
3. It was derived from kaphar as used in the Piel stem.
4. It was used in the name of the Jewish holiday Yom Kippur, “Day of Atonement” (Lev. 25:9).
5. Yom Kippur was the 10th day of the seventh month, Tishri.
6. Israel fasted on this day and it was celebrated by a special sin offering for the whole nation.
7. The high priest would enter within the inner veil bearing the blood of the sin offering (Heb. 9:7).
8. A 2nd goat was released as an escape goat to symbolize the total removal of sin.
9. Kippur denoted God’s act of removing the guilt of Israel’s sin.
10. The Greek equivalent is the noun hilasmos.


So then Lev 25:9

9 You shall then sound a ram’s horn abroad on the tenth day of the seventh month; on the day of atonement you shall sound a horn all through your land.

9 καὶ διαγγελεῖτε σάλπιγγος φωνῇ ἐν πάσῃ τῇ γῇ ὑμῶν τῷ μηνὶ τῷ ἑβδόμῳ τῇ δεκάτῃ τοῦ μηνός· τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τοῦ ἱλασμοῦ διαγγελεῖτε σάλπιγγι ἐν πάσῃ τῇ γῇ ὑμῶν



Ezek 45:20

20 And they shall take of its blood, and shall put [it] on the four horns of the altar, and upon the four corners of the propitiatory, and upon the base round about, and they shall make atonement for it

20 καὶ οὕτως ποιήσεις ἐν τῷ ἑβδόμῳ μηνὶ μιᾷ τοῦ μηνὸς λήμψῃ παρ᾿ ἑκάστου ἀπόμοιραν καὶ ἐξιλάσεσθε τὸν οἶκον

ἐξιλάσεσθε atonement, ransom, propitiatory offering

ἐξίλασμα

2434. hilasmos

Strong's Concordance

hilasmos: propitiation

Original Word: ἱλασμός, οῦ, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: hilasmos
Phonetic Spelling: (hil-as-mos')
Short Definition: a propitiation, atoning sacrifice
Definition: a propitiation (of an angry god), atoning sacrifice.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

Heb 10 "The blood of bulls and goats COULD NEVER take away sins" -- the only benefit of the OT sacrifices was 'instructive' - they explain the Gospel - in pictures. But the animal sacrifices themselves did not suffice to forgive anyone. No one will be in heaven talking about how their sheep and goats paid for all their sins. Christ's sacrifice alone does that.

Moses and Elijah stand with Christ in glory in Matthew 17 - not because of the efficacy of animal blood - but because of the shed blood of Jesus.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

No one was saved under the "old covenant" -- it was "obey and live" and was first given to Adam in his sinless state.

No one who is actually under the "new Covenant" of Jeremiah - 31 -- is lost. As Romans 3 points out the Law of God remains and to this very day condemns all the world as sinners and in need of the Gospel. Only those who choose the Gospel escape its condemnation... OT or NT. The same.

Jeremiah, Moses, Elijah ... had the law of God "written on the heart" under the NEW Covenant of Jer 31
 
Upvote 0