- Jan 7, 2003
- 41,908
- 19,899
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Unitarian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
That doesn't seem to make a dent.Oh I think so, because you've given it.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That doesn't seem to make a dent.Oh I think so, because you've given it.
No its not. It's okay to hold your opinion, but it's not. What's your evidence? Simply cutting budgets is not evidence that it's anti-intellectualism.Cutting the budget of scientific research while increasing the budget of presidential golf rounds is anti-intellectualism.
And it is plain stupid.
Immigration law does not have the same requirements as criminal law. Not sure how manybtimes it needs to be said. You can be frustrated over it, but it is the law of the land and has been adjudicated as such. You'll need a different ruling from the Supreme Court. Just like we had to get.Except in these and similar visa revocations, when their visa is revoked they become subject to ICE when suddenly they are no longer "documented".
What does that even mean? Inbthe definition it talks about several things, art being one of them. How is disagreeing rhat something is art or not anti-intellectual?I must have missed this comment. But surely one can have "anti-intellectual" opinions, no?
I'm saying it's a bad definition. My art example shows why.What do you mean by this? Do you mean to imply that "the concept of a particular definition" can be "right" or "wrong?"
I understand art is often seen as "subjective" and "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder," but there are certainly ways that anti-intellectual opinions could play out in the art world regardless if we use your preferred definition of anti-intellectual or the others in this thread.
right and it's not years of the right and fox news complaining about, "ivory tower elites." and attacks on experts if they disagree with the right, just look at how many think trumps smarter then all the economists.I think the criteria for being an intellectual has changed. A long time ago one could be left, center, or right and still be an intellectual. I think now it is required that one be on the left to be an intellectual. So if you have a centrist or even right of center position you are not an intellectual and are in face anti-intellectual. It's just the times we live in.
It would be nice of they at least told the students.How do you know?
You have no idea why these visas were canceled. Neither do I. But there was a reason. All college foreigners were not put in a hat and randomly selected.
Now we could argue that the State Dept. should tell the Amercan people why each and every student was ejected. But why should they? The left would attack them for just about any reason for it, so why bother. They don't have to provide anyone a reason. And until you can prove that there was NO reason for it, I will believe there was a reason. Its either that or the lottery, pick a student from a hat theory.
The UC Davis article said this:
"A spokesperson said the department generally won't comment on specific cases due to privacy considerations and visa confidentiality.
The spokesperson also cited "zero tolerance" for non-citizens who violate U.S. laws and said that all visa applicants are "continuously vetted."
The 'rules' that you have, being a democratic country with a Bill of rights and a constitution, allow for views to be expressed.It would be nicer if foreign students respected our citizens and our rules.
Expressing a view and becoming political activists in a host country are two entirely different things.Then why should students be prevented from expressing views with which you object?
Publicly expressing a political view is being active. And hey, if you want to describe a protest against so many deaths as political activism, then you be you. But you're allowed to do it. I'll support your right to do it, even though I might think your views abhorrent. I really will stand up for you. Whether you do it at home or abroad. It's your right.Expressing a view and becoming political activists in a host country are two entirely different things.
Not really.Expressing a view and becoming political activists in a host country are two entirely different things.
There are over 6000 foreign students at Harvard. How many violated the rules or even protested?It would be nicer if foreign students respected our citizens and our rules.