The millions who do understand it would disagree with you. I'm not speaking of the hundreds of millions who believe the theory. They are not relevant to this dicussion. I'm talking about those who have made a proper study of theory in enough depth and breadth to be thoroughly convinced by it. Millions. Many millions, yet you - who have given it no more than a cursory glance - are able to see that these millions, who have studied the theory in depth, many of them (hundreds of thousands at least) who have contributed to the refinement of the theory, these millions are wrong and you are right. I don't need to be sceptical to see how silly that is.
Dealt with above. It's not relevant. The lax rules for belief in creation is one of the things that makes atheists.
You have failed to provide any details whatsoever to justify this position. You have offered it repeatedly as a bland assertion. In contrast several members have provided information and argument to justify the view that comparative anatomy supports evolution. Demonstrate you are capable of change: provide evidence justifying your position, not just a repeat of your infantile Argument from Obviousness.
Obviousness is an opinion. Obviousness is subjective. Obviousness is not quantifiable. Obviousness is not scientific.
Because you have failed to employ one ounce of knowledge, one ounce of science, one ounce of testing, one ounce of validation, one ounce of measurement. You are doing nothing more than a guy in a bar, with too much to drink, arguing about the best ever heavyweight champion based on what he thinks he's seen, thinks he knows. And you keep repeating it. That's trolling.
