Ttalkkugjil
Social Pastor
- Mar 6, 2019
- 1,680
- 908
- Country
- Korea, Republic Of
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Others
"most likely" hmmm sounds confident.
Again.... wow. What you must glean from newspapers these days.
OK......That's not what I mean.. You keep missing the point...
My point:
It says household...this does not mean children. Records of this time disregard children and women in most cases... There is confidence that men and women were.. but people in the day would understand that children were not.
It is not explicit....
Again..... ugh... households does not mean infants, children, women and children...
We have no reason to believe that women would not be.. but.. it does not mean children... You cannot claim that.. based on methods of recording of that day..
It is only you..............assuming.
I disagree.
Households means households - including children.
You still haven't answered my question - why would people who have discovered the great new thing of Christian baptism leave their children out of having it?
Upvote
0