Hi. My question is just a simple one but with a long backstory.. I was baptized as an infant. I've always held this baptism as a true one based on this: I believe if you are baptized and later on decide to not follow God, your baptism is no longer valid. That being said, I believe in the opposite, if you decide to come to God after being baptized, your baptism is in fact, valid. I've also thought that the babies were dedicated in the Israelites' covenant after 8 days, and entire households were baptized in the New Testament. That being said, the church I belong to now believes my baptism is not valid by noting that in the New Testament, it is 'believe, then be baptized'. This obviously disturbs me because, does my baptism count? Do I need to be re-baptized? I don't know, and I've been following God for a while now and am scared that I've been following all this time but missing a step. I've always thought my baptism was valid until my pastor said it was not. Can somebody shine some light on this?
I go to a church that doesn't have a specific denomnation but clearly leans baptist. I'm posting it here as I do think it's a theology question, although it does fall under 'Christian Advice' as well.
Hey I know many people consider water baptism to be a requirement for salvation - which it sounds like you do. Simply stating "valid" or "invalid" you consider your infant baptism to just be something you do, rather than something you do when you believe. I think you should reconsider your thought patterns on it.
Legend:
R = What saves B = Result of being saved G = What they did not do to be saved
Acts 10:43-47
To Him all the prophets witness that, through His name,
whoever believes in Him will receive remission of sins.”
While Peter was still speaking these words,
the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God.
Then Peter answered,
“Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?”
I want to say these people who were baptized with the holy spirit were saved apart from their water baptism. Baptism is something you do because you believe, not just to do. They received it while He was still speaking to them about Jesus, implying that their belief 'gave them the forgiveness of sins' and the holy spirit. Read this next passage to solidify your understanding.
Ephesians 1:13-14
In Him you also trusted,
after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation;
in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.
Please look at the colored wording, they were sealed with the holy spirit who is a 'guarantee of the inheritance' which means salvation.
So having said that don't feel guilt stricken if you think your baptism is invalid. I do believe the Lord Jesus took up all sin at his baptism and carried them to the cross, blotting them out forever. So those who believe in his work are sinless and are pure in his eyes. Those who follow after him.
I do suggest being baptized if you are/do become sinless. As Jesus wants his believers to do it as a result of the remission of sins they received for their belief in Him.
I personally have not been water baptized in my life. Though this doesn't effect my conscience whatsoever. People may bring up that typical Acts 2 verse and say its a requirement, but thats just an implication not a fact. I showed you scripture that shows people doing it instead of stating it. And also there is a verse such as John 3:5. Personally I believe it refers to the ministries of John and Christ, such as Christ said in Acts 1:5 when he departed.