Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The main problem with infant baptism is that the infant has no idea of what is taking place.Raindog said:My Father, a Lutheran pastor has been saying for years that the Baptists should give up the name and go with Decisionalists or something because to them Baptism is just a symbolic decision one makes that has absoultly nothing to do with salavation. Although oddly they do focus on a voluntary, non-required action a lot. I think it's because the Baptists love being the center of attention, and to that end will be baptised three or six times in their lives.
Anyway Baptisim is a sacrament, and a nesscary one at that. If you don't want your kids baptised, fine, but what if your child decides never to be baptised. I guess that wouldn't bother you too much because all it is an outword act symbolic of an inner devotion.
Basically I don't understand this question. If it comes from someone who doesn't believe in infant baptism what do you care about churches who do?
The main problem with infant baptism is that the infant has no idea of what is taking place.
Under those conditions the baptism is really of no value.
A person must be able to choose if he/she wants to be baptised. Infants cannot do that.
I do not agree with the above quote at all. I have not seen one verse to support "infant baptism"Oblio said:This is only a problem for those that deny that God can work through His physical creation to bestow Grace upon His children.
Symes said:I do not agree with the above quote at all. I have not seen one verse to support "infant baptism"
When I see one, then I will support it.
I haven't read through the whole thread, but I saw this and wanted to reply:inquisitive725 said:But surely no one thinks they could go to hell, right?
I don't want to step on any toes with this thread. I'm just trying to find a new church and I don't believe in infant baptism. Honestly though, I think I will have some issues with every church, so I'm trying to see if I can go to this one I like, without being pressured to have my child baptized. But I won't feel good about it if they believe that strongly that it is necessary for his salvation.
Thanks, and my apologies if this offends anyone!
A person must choose? When was that a requirement, I don't remember Jesus saying, "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations and when and if they choose you should baptize them in the name...". Have you guys talked about the "households" that were baptized in Acts and the epistles? Then of course I guess you don't accept tradition that has, St. Polycarp being baptized as an Infant, and St. John, son of Zebedee, the beloved disciple, not having him rebaptized.Symes said:The main problem with infant baptism is that the infant has no idea of what is taking place.
Under those conditions the baptism is really of no value.
A person must be able to choose if he/she wants to be baptised. Infants cannot do that.
Are you saying a person does not have choice as to whether they want to follow Jesus or not?JVAC said:A person must choose? When was that a requirement, I don't remember Jesus saying, "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations and when and if they choose you should baptize them in the name...". Have you guys talked about the "households" that were baptized in Acts and the epistles? Then of course I guess you don't accept tradition that has, St. Polycarp being baptized as an Infant, and St. John, son of Zebedee, the beloved disciple, not having him rebaptized.
-James
Households of believing adults were baptized.
Are you a Christian because you first chose God, or because He first chose you?Symes said:Are you saying a person does not have choice as to whether they want to follow Jesus or not?
Scripture says households, and never mentions the age of anyone, adult or child. Though, it has always been believed that those households did contain children.Households of believing adults were baptized. It does not say one word that the infants were baptized.
Jesus never baptized anyone. Just because there are no specific accounts of John baptizing infants does not mean that he did not.Jesus never baptized infants nor did John.
Read "The Martyrdom of St Polycarp"As for Polycarp I would need to have some better evidence that you just saying he was baptized as an infant.
Symes said:Matthew 28:19.20
"Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen."
This command from Jesus rules out infants.
Adults are taught to observe, this hardly fits into how infants respond.
Although what you say about infants is right it has nothing to do with the baptism of infants. It does not mean infants can be therofore baptised.Celticflower said:Since infants are basically learning from day one how can you say this? They may not understand words or sermons, but they can learn from what goes on around them and the way people react to them. If a child is baptized as an infant and raised in the church is this not following the command you quoted?
Celtie
Can you imagine infants going to the Jordan and being baptized?
I can't and I doubt if anyone else can either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?