thaiv said:...
Yes, it is a bad faith argument to both give credence to the Bible while claiming that it has no credence.....
1. The Bible is said to be corrupted...how do you know Deut. 18:18 is not corrupted? Life is not a box of chocolate. You can not just pick and choose what is corrupted and what is not after the Quran came hundreds of years later.
Yes, King Solomon, who Moslems respect so much, in particular, fits the description of a statesman, law-giver, leader, etc, etc. in the likeness of Moses. This was already pointed out many post ago.2. The comparisons given on the Muslim side of the argument can apply to Alexander the Great and many, many other people.
This is the illogic that arises when people begin arguing from a premise that they don't even believe in in the first place.3. Our muslim friend admits that Christ fulfills Deut. 18:18 at His second coming. If He is the Prophet at that coming would he not still be that Prophet before? He was that Prophet, He is that Prophet, and He will be manifested as that Prophet. You can not have Muhammad at one time and Jesus at another time fulfilling one prophecy.
Frankly, one of our Moslem poster pointed this out already. The Bible is simply not improtant to Moslems, he states, and a prophecy in the Bible would make none of them believe in Mohammed either any more or any less.
The main intent of such threads, therefore, seems to be to mainly to cast dispersions on Christian belief.
Clearly Genesis 18 is talking specifically about the brethren of Levi. This would be of the tribes of Israel.4. Ishmael is the children of Israel's second uncle not brother. Geneology: Abraham begot Isaac and Isaac begot Jacob (Israel)....
It is scriptural. Specific texts in Acts and John state this is exactly what was meant, and not in an metaphorical or poetic sense, but in a literal sense. This is what was being argued about in John, and in Acts, the fact is pointed out with a direct quotation of Deuteronomy 18.5. Guess what else?? This is the best part. Earlier I mentioned "quantity" and "quality" ...Actually Jesus wins the "quantity" aspect as well because much of the comparision you made applies to Jesus.
For Christians and Jews, Scripture was central to the claims. For the Koran, the Bible is merely an afterthought.
(..and yet, since the Qu'ran seems to claim that Mohammed was prophecied in both Testaments, as Moslems are becoming more literate and educated, the tension is likely becoming intolerable for those Moslems with any integrity as they search for these prophecies.)
.In conclusion: Jesus is that Prophet
The reason that this fact is so easily forgotten by Christians-including thatmarginal Christian that instructed Mohammed- is that Jesus is so very much more than the Prophet of Deuteronomy 18.
Seven times in the Book of John, even eight, Jesus repeats this.You used the book of John, my muslim friend. Now I will use it. Jesus is God! (John 1:1).
"I am I AM!", He tells us again and again.
And this is the good news indeed!
What need do we have of another prophet when we have already been provided with the Truth?!
What need do we have of another prophet when we have already been given the Way?!
What need to we have of another law-giver when we have already been given the instruction to love God with all our heart and soul and mind, and to love our neighbours as ourselves?
Yes, it is a bad faith argument to both give credence to the Bible while claiming that it has no credence
Frankly, one of our Moslem poster pointed this out already. The Bible is simply not improtant to Moslems, he states, and a prophecy in the Bible would make none of them believe in Mohammed either any more or any less
[/i said:ghazirizv]As I am not that learned in the Bible (frankly I really dont care all that much if Prophet Muhammed [SAW] is mentioned in the Bible as it is irrelevant to my practice of Islam).
If the Bible is important, and is a book from God, it should never thenghazirizvi said:The Bible is important to Muslims to believe in. I never said it wasnt important. I just said that the Bible is not required for a Muslim in order to practice Islam, as we have something better. But we still believe in the Bible, and it still holds importance with us as it is a book from God (SWT). So when muslims point out the prophecy fo Deut 18, it is not to destroy the credibility of christianity, but it is a discussion point on this board as it is mentioned in the Quran that Prophet Muhammed (SAW) is mentioned in the Bible and Torah.
As a muslim I take that prophecy as being related to Muhammed (SAW) as a christian you may take it to mean Jesus (SAW), but both our opinions remain biased, thus there is a debate and discussion. We need a neutral party in here.
ghazirizvi, how can the Bible be important to muslims when muslims are always saying it is corrupt?ghazirizvi said:The Bible is important to Muslims to believe in. I never said it wasnt important. I just said that the Bible is not required for a Muslim in order to practice Islam, as we have something better. But we still believe in the Bible, and it still holds importance with us as it is a book from God (SWT). So when muslims point out the prophecy fo Deut 18, it is not to destroy the credibility of christianity, but it is a discussion point on this board as it is mentioned in the Quran that Prophet Muhammed (SAW) is mentioned in the Bible and Torah.
As a muslim I take that prophecy as being related to Muhammed (SAW) as a christian you may take it to mean Jesus (SAW), but both our opinions remain biased, thus there is a debate and discussion. We need a neutral party in here.
ghazirizvi, how can the Bible be important to muslims when muslims are always saying it is corrupt?
Arthra said:....
A Baha'i writer, Marzieh Gail also identified this:
Muhammad descends from Abraham through Ishmael... Deuteronomy, 18:18 says: "I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee (Moses), and will put my words in his mouth..." This could not refer to the Israelites because it says "brethren," not "seed." John 1:19-21 shows that the Jews were expecting three personages: Christ, Elias, and that Prophet like unto Moses: the Jews having asked John the Baptist if he was Christ, he said no; "And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not, Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No." Qur'an 73:15 compares Muhammad to Moses: "Verily we have sent unto you an Apostle to witness against you, even as we sent an Apostle to Pharaoh."
thaiv said:1. The Bible is said to be corrupted...how do you know Deut. 18:18 is not corrupted? Life is not a box of chocolate. You can not just pick and choose what is corrupted and what is not after the Quran came hundreds of years later.
thaiv said:3. Our muslim friend admits that Christ fulfills Deut. 18:18 at His second coming. If He is the Prophet at that coming was he not also that Prophet before? He was that Prophet, He is that Prophet, and He will be manifested as that Prophet. That portion in Acts is saying that Jesus is coming as the Prophet. It is not that He became the Prophet later on. In addition, you can not have Muhammad at one time and Jesus at another time fulfilling one prophecy.
solomon said:Deuteronomy 18 was being addressed specifically to the Levites. Therefore their brothers would excluded to the brothers of Levi ie Judah, Benjamin, Joseph et al.
This Prophet was not to come from the seed of Levi, true.
But the seed of Judah is not the seed of Levi.
Other places in the Bible where brethren is used to include other than the Israeli tribes, this inclusiveness is spelled out specifically.