- Jul 12, 2016
- 5,417
- 5,524
- 72
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
I think it would be most unlikely that Ken would be correct in thinking an appeal to the High Court would find the law unconstitutional. There are aspects which get confused between what we are and what we do, both the the matter of Homosexuality and Christianity. There is now way in which this law might be said to prevent you from being Christian. If the essence of Christianity is to follow in the footsteps of Jesus, we might observe our commonly accepted records of Jesus ministry on earth, and discover that he did not discuss Same Sex Attraction, though he did speak in favour of conventional marriage and of the need to try and stay true, honourable and faithful.As it was you who were saying what religious free exercise (in Australia) might not cover I directed the question to you.
I don't know for sure what would happen in event of a test case. Ken may be correct in that religious free exercise could be said to cover if not all yet some instances of christian pastoral care in which the individual seeking help is a christian, doesn't identify as gay, lesbian etc. and wants prayer for release from homosexual desires. Perhaps a case might be made that feelings by themselves do not constitute an orientation or identity. I don't think one can pray for someone to be converted from homosexual to hetrosexual - I think its better to just discern by pastoral conversation and spiritual gifts if the person has unmet emotional needs, and or barriers and pray about those, asking them to repent from any overt sin. I don't know however what way asking someone to repent from homosexual sin would be viewed under this law?
How many therapists does it take the change a lightbulb?
One, but the lightbulb has to want to change.
One, but the lightbulb has to want to change.
Upvote
0