Kinda like here, eh?If anything you'd be dismissed as a troll after enough time, but not banned.
If you enjoy the persecution you receive here, you'll love it there. They're not so conservative in word choice on atheist forums.Kinda like here, eh?
But there's two people here who want me outright banned, w/o any warnings or infractions first.
In that case I'll stay here, where the wolves have to don sheeps' clothing and act against their mien.If you enjoy the persecution you receive here, you'll love it there. They're not so conservative in word choice on atheist forums.
That's not going to happen AV1611VET this is a Christian forum, banning creationists for saying ludicrous things would kinda defeat the object don't you think?Kinda like here, eh?
But there's two people here who want me outright banned, w/o any warnings or infractions first.
Hey Phred, don't speak so nice about Christians. Your Atheist buddies will think you've gone soft, that your giving us a free pass. Why do you ask "HOW did your god do it"? You know our answer, He created the universe, but there isn't any proof you would accept, is there? Atheist can't give Christians any proof for, how the universe came into being out of nothing, how life came from non life and how one species evolved into a completely different species. We would like proof not someone's idea of how it might of happened. If you say your absolutely certain it happened you're either lying, stupid, insane or... no that's all.
If you enjoy the persecution you receive here, you'll love it there. They're not so conservative in word choice on atheist forums.
In that case I'll stay here, where the wolves have to don sheeps' clothing and act against their mien.
Christians are the ones making the positive claims.I'm tired of Atheist always getting a pass when Christians can't answer their questions.
There are many bibles and holy books, all claiming to the the right one. I am not reading them all.I guess you haven't heard of the bible,
Testable. Repeatable. Verifiable by others. That will do for me.you know that evidence that God exist and that He has left behind. I know, I know, it's not the kind of evidence you want.
How did you establish that? The universe may have always existed.I agree the Big Bang doesn't point to God, but it does point to a creator of the universe.
A creator outside of space and time would not be of much use to us, would it?This creator has to be outside of time and space, and it sure would be nice if He told us who He was and how He did it.
Science doesn't do 'proofs', but my response is: What is the difference between life and non-life?You say "all these things are provided with science", ok then, where's you scientific proof that life did come from non-life.
That is not my claim, but I'm sure that the universe is here, and I am not sure that it is possible for there to be 'nothing'.While your at it can I have your scientific proof that the universe (physical stuff) came from nothing (non-physical stuff),
Taking into account the various definitions of 'species', it may be as simple as a population of critters being divided and kept separated by a physical barrier (mountains, water) for a long period of time, each with their own differing set of environmental pressures.and how one species evolved into a completely different species.
I do not think so. If people went with the evidence, scientific or otherwise, they would not be an Atheist. If there is no evidence for a God, then there is no evidence that there is not a God.
I hate foul language -- especially when it is used to vent against God.I can only imagine, but if I really thought that I had an omnipotent deity riding shotgun in my life, why would I have any fears about jumping into an atheist/skeptical forum?
Go for it. What's the worst that can happen?
I hate foul language -- especially when it is used to vent against God.
And it has nothing to do with [progressive] sanctification; I hated it before I was saved, and I still hate it.
In a week's time, I might watch one hour of TV; but that's pushing it.
Christians are the ones making the positive claims.
There's no need. Jesus's parables. when understood, cover in essence all the mysteries within various religions. [BIBLE]"I will open my mouth in parables, I will utter what has been hidden since the foundation of the world." (Matt. 13:35)[/BIBLE] The Parables of Jesus. Beyond that you're talking clarification and/or redundancy.There are many bibles and holy books, all claiming to the the right one. I am not reading them all.
A creator outside of space and time would not be of much use to us, would it?
Meaning people get banned without warning, right?The JREF forums are better moderated than the inconsistant moderation we see here...
There are ways around autocensors, and one doesn't have to use foul language to blaspheme Jesus.... and foul language is autocensored there.
Yes, science actually supports everything said in Genesis one:
It is clear that the Universe DID have a beginning, 13.5 billion years ago.
(Gen 1:1)
There were seven long Cosmic "days" since that Big Bang, which we call the seven cosmic/geological Eras.
A Cosmic Dark Age did precede that advent of let there be light to flood the cosmos.
(Gen 1:3-5)
There was one ocean, once, where all the waters had been collected together.
(Gen 1:9)
Pangea/Rodinia did actually confirm that the dry land appeared surrounded totally by water.
(Gen 1:10)
The Plant kingdom did establish itself before the Animal kingdom.
(Gen 1:11)
Man WAS the last step in the evolution of Dominant Life on earth.
(Gen 1:27)
Meaning people get banned without warning, right?
There are ways around autocensors, and one doesn't have to use foul language to blaspheme Jesus.
If this site is any indication of what atheists & scientists think of us, then I'm not interested in one that is dedicated to science alone.
God is the Author of science, but 5% of science -- the loudest portion -- turned its back on God and hates Him with a passion.
Additionally, according to the bible, God doesn't even create the cosmos until the fourth day (Gen 1:15-17).
Science supports Gen 1. Maybe not what you call science. But real science supports the Bible from cover to cover. What you call "science" is little more then Jerry-rigged propaganda. Most people use science to find the truth. But a few Atheists like to try to bend and twist science to cover up and to hide the truth from others.So, no. Science does not support Genesis 1. That's called creationism, not science.
God writes on the tablet of your heart. Unless you harden your heart against Him.What papers did he author? I did a search for "God" on Pubmed, but couldn't find any.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?