Macx
Well-Known Member
- Aug 7, 2007
- 5,544
- 412
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Is it really, or does it just take a little more sweat and toil than the average working people are willing to put their backs into?
Having spent time outside the U.S. . . my question would be: Is it the standard of living is above the cost of living or below the cost of living? I'd contend, that in a country that has historically held 90% of the world's wealth, the other 10% of the wealth being distributed among THE REST OF THE WORLD . . . we (Americans) have gotten used to living above our means. When Americans try and be responsible and only pay for what they can afford (keep the credit cards paid off, buy & drive used cars that can be paid off in a year, buy housing with a mortgage payment at or below cost to rent) . . . they find they aren't "living as well" as their neighbors who owe for 5 years on a car, owe on their TV, will be paying on their house for 30 years (most of it in paying interest), sure . . . if you live responsibly, you will not have as nice of stuff as the debt slaves around you. It is merely the price of freedom. One of the glorious things about this country is that you can be free or you can be a debt slave and it is 100% your choice. If as a free person you chose to try and keep up (in actual ownership) with the debt slaves (in terms of stuff the bank owns that they get the use of), you will have to work VERY, VERY hard.
The cost of living isn't really that high, the cost of eating steaks regularly and owning the same kind of stuff Joe Suburb doesn't really own but sure makes payments on & plays with . . . that is pretty high. I think you are perhaps comparing apples to oranges. The actual cost of living and the cost of living at a standard the media has convinced Americans they "should" live at, are two entirely different things. Just because I don't eat many steaks in a year, doesn't mean I am living badly. I like steak, I just don't like it enough to do what it takes to eat it weekly. . . . that isn't wrong, or something I think the world should "fix".
Having spent time outside the U.S. . . my question would be: Is it the standard of living is above the cost of living or below the cost of living? I'd contend, that in a country that has historically held 90% of the world's wealth, the other 10% of the wealth being distributed among THE REST OF THE WORLD . . . we (Americans) have gotten used to living above our means. When Americans try and be responsible and only pay for what they can afford (keep the credit cards paid off, buy & drive used cars that can be paid off in a year, buy housing with a mortgage payment at or below cost to rent) . . . they find they aren't "living as well" as their neighbors who owe for 5 years on a car, owe on their TV, will be paying on their house for 30 years (most of it in paying interest), sure . . . if you live responsibly, you will not have as nice of stuff as the debt slaves around you. It is merely the price of freedom. One of the glorious things about this country is that you can be free or you can be a debt slave and it is 100% your choice. If as a free person you chose to try and keep up (in actual ownership) with the debt slaves (in terms of stuff the bank owns that they get the use of), you will have to work VERY, VERY hard.
The cost of living isn't really that high, the cost of eating steaks regularly and owning the same kind of stuff Joe Suburb doesn't really own but sure makes payments on & plays with . . . that is pretty high. I think you are perhaps comparing apples to oranges. The actual cost of living and the cost of living at a standard the media has convinced Americans they "should" live at, are two entirely different things. Just because I don't eat many steaks in a year, doesn't mean I am living badly. I like steak, I just don't like it enough to do what it takes to eat it weekly. . . . that isn't wrong, or something I think the world should "fix".
Upvote
0