• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

if you hacked Hunter's emails why WOULDN'T you do deceitful things to a laptop to share the emails.

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
41,953
19,930
Finger Lakes
✟310,402.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
15,259
5,997
Pacific Northwest
✟216,150.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The previous House committee dealt with mountains of evidence about the 1/6 insurrection.

The current House committee is hoping they can create enough of a brouhaha with a help of their favorite media sources to make 1% as much evidence appear to be as abundant. SMH.
about 1% of what was presented at the 1/6 hearing was actually evidence. That would have become obvious if anyone had been allowed to challenge it.
 
Upvote 0

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
15,259
5,997
Pacific Northwest
✟216,150.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
To what "House Kangaroo Court" do you refer? The J6 hearings? The ones that presented actual evidence?


That certainly is a hypothetical because there's nothing of the sort on the hard drive of the supposed laptop. It's conservative fan fiction and nothing more.
10% for the "Big Guy" thank you for getting us in to see your father. There is plenty of evidence on that hard drive which is why the FBI has helped to keep it out of sight. Funny how "actual evidence" can be ignored in one case and accepted without question in another, it clearly says something.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
10% for the "Big Guy" thank you for getting us in to see your father.
Making up stuff is even worse when your starting point is rebutted by the author.

>> James Gilliar, a business associate summarizing the allocation of the equity in Oneida Holdings LLC., in the email, wrote how four partners would get 20 percent each, except for Jim Biden, who would get 10 percent. He added a question: “10 held by H for the big guy?” One of the recipients of the mail, Anthony Bobulinski, has said that the “big guy” referred to Joe Biden and that “H” referred to Hunter. Bobulinski was a guest of Trump at one of the 2020 presidential debates.

But Gilliar told the Wall Street Journal in 2020: “I would like to clear up any speculation that former Vice President Biden was involved with the 2017 discussions about our potential business structure. I am unaware of any involvement at anytime of the former vice president. The activity in question never delivered any project revenue.” <<
There is plenty of evidence on that hard drive which is why the FBI has helped to keep it out of sight.
Or, and I know this will sound insane to you, the Conservisphere has been lying to you about the contents of the hard drive. I mean Rudy and Steve Bannon have copies of the data for Pete's sake! Don't you think if either of them had anything that constituted evidence or a smoking gun they would have gone public with it years ago?
Funny how "actual evidence" can be ignored in one case and accepted without question in another, it clearly says something.
Conservisphere fan fiction about the supposed laptop isn't actual evidence. I seriously think the problem is the right have so fetishized the supposed laptop and it's contents that y'all are imagining things on there that just don't exist.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
about 1% of what was presented at the 1/6 hearing was actually evidence. That would have become obvious if anyone had been allowed to challenge it.
Kevin McCarthy had 208 acceptable Republicans he could have placed on the committee. Instead he decided to not seat any. The lack of dissenting voices was 100% on him.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
42,404
45,533
Los Angeles Area
✟1,012,476.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
about 1% of what was presented at the 1/6 hearing was actually evidence. That would have become obvious if anyone had been allowed to challenge it.
Fortunately, we have all the criminal trials where evidence was presented and secured convictions, despite any challenges from the defense.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
10,639
10,389
the Great Basin
✟403,432.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
10% for the "Big Guy" thank you for getting us in to see your father. There is plenty of evidence on that hard drive which is why the FBI has helped to keep it out of sight. Funny how "actual evidence" can be ignored in one case and accepted without question in another, it clearly says something.
Odd that the Republican investigators keep refusing to claim this -- despite the fact the hard drive was "read into" the Congressional record. Instead, they admit they have no actual evidence and need to get more bank records to find evidence to support the claims they say they "have evidence" for but have never shown in a hearing, or talked about in their press conferences.
 
Upvote 0

perplexed

Senior Member
Jun 22, 2005
2,473
717
52
✟162,020.00
Faith
Seeker
10% for the "Big Guy" thank you for getting us in to see your father. There is plenty of evidence on that hard drive which is why the FBI has helped to keep it out of sight. Funny how "actual evidence" can be ignored in one case and accepted without question in another, it clearly says something.
glad you said hard drive and not laptop.
 
Upvote 0

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
15,259
5,997
Pacific Northwest
✟216,150.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Making up stuff is even worse when your starting point is rebutted by the author.

>> James Gilliar, a business associate summarizing the allocation of the equity in Oneida Holdings LLC., in the email, wrote how four partners would get 20 percent each, except for Jim Biden, who would get 10 percent. He added a question: “10 held by H for the big guy?” One of the recipients of the mail, Anthony Bobulinski, has said that the “big guy” referred to Joe Biden and that “H” referred to Hunter. Bobulinski was a guest of Trump at one of the 2020 presidential debates.

But Gilliar told the Wall Street Journal in 2020: “I would like to clear up any speculation that former Vice President Biden was involved with the 2017 discussions about our potential business structure. I am unaware of any involvement at anytime of the former vice president. The activity in question never delivered any project revenue.” <<

Or, and I know this will sound insane to you, the Conservisphere has been lying to you about the contents of the hard drive. I mean Rudy and Steve Bannon have copies of the data for Pete's sake! Don't you think if either of them had anything that constituted evidence or a smoking gun they would have gone public with it years ago?

Conservisphere fan fiction about the supposed laptop isn't actual evidence. I seriously think the problem is the right have so fetishized the supposed laptop and it's contents that y'all are imagining things on there that just don't exist.
 
Upvote 0

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
15,259
5,997
Pacific Northwest
✟216,150.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Fortunately, we have all the criminal trials where evidence was presented and secured convictions, despite any challenges from the defense.
Yes and we also have several witnesses who disputed the stories told in the 1/6 hearings
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,611
13,970
Earth
✟244,779.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
15,259
5,997
Pacific Northwest
✟216,150.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Odd that the Republican investigators keep refusing to claim this -- despite the fact the hard drive was "read into" the Congressional record. Instead, they admit they have no actual evidence and need to get more bank records to find evidence to support the claims they say they "have evidence" for but have never shown in a hearing, or talked about in their press conferences.
your post is self contradictory, how can they admit they have no evidence and at the same time claim they have evidence. The evidence is being withheld by the DOJ but it will come out. Second Hunter Biden IRS whistleblower emerges after dismissal despite five years on case
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
42,404
45,533
Los Angeles Area
✟1,012,476.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
some appeared at the 1/6 hearings and disputed what others had testified.
Well, from what I hear, "about 1% of what was presented at the 1/6 hearing was actually evidence." so their testimony isn't worth much. Everybody knows that evidence is only evidence when it's in a court of law. And that's where these hundreds of Jan 6 criminals have been judged or pleaded guilty.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,611
13,970
Earth
✟244,779.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Well, from what I hear, "about 1% of what was presented at the 1/6 hearing was actually evidence." so their testimony isn't worth much. Everybody knows that evidence is only evidence when it's in a court of law. And that's where these hundreds of Jan 6 criminals have been judged or pleaded guilty.
So, we’ve finally arrived at the fourth act!
Narrator: “But, in ‘reality’! it was all just a scam by the government to trick patriotic Americans into committing crimes! The fiends!”

The denouement must be Awesome!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Yes. The NY Post editorial department has gone all in on Hunter to the point of obsession. Not sure why you thought that was germane. Again, Gilliar actually wrote the "10% for big guy" email. He should know who if it was a reference to former VP Biden or not. Also again, if the supposed laptop is so full of incriminating evidence, why hasn't Rudy or Bannon gone public with it yet?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
10,639
10,389
the Great Basin
✟403,432.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
your post is self contradictory, how can they admit they have no evidence and at the same time claim they have evidence. The evidence is being withheld by the DOJ but it will come out. Second Hunter Biden IRS whistleblower emerges after dismissal despite five years on case

Not contradictory at all, just indicates lying -- much like you used to claim about Schiff, who you admitted claimed to have evidence. It isn't the first time they've done it either; Republicans have claimed to have evidence when they investigated Hillary almost a decade ago, before ending the hearings admitting there was no wrong doing. They did the same the first time they investigated the Biden, back in 2020, right before the election.

It is why I find it so ironic that some of the same people that claim to have had evidence, and found none during the hearings are now wanting to kick Adam Schiff out of Congress for doing what they had previously done.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
42,404
45,533
Los Angeles Area
✟1,012,476.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
We've had first laptop yes, but what about second laptop?

1684957075307.png
 
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
10,639
10,389
the Great Basin
✟403,432.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We've had first laptop yes, but what about second laptop?

View attachment 331451

I suppose this will happen just after Trump wins the 2020 election, and Doug Mastriano (for whom she was a campaign prophet) is installed the Governor of Pennsylvania (both of which she "prophesied").
 
Upvote 0

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
15,259
5,997
Pacific Northwest
✟216,150.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yes. The NY Post editorial department has gone all in on Hunter to the point of obsession. Not sure why you thought that was germane. Again, Gilliar actually wrote the "10% for big guy" email. He should know who if it was a reference to former VP Biden or not. Also again, if the supposed laptop is so full of incriminating evidence, why hasn't Rudy or Bannon gone public with it yet?
it was, it was done so long ago that no one remembers because they were sold on the lie that it was Russian disinformation.
 
Upvote 0