If U.S. creationists truly believe evolution is a religion, why don't they sue over it?

[Sanoy]

In 20-30 years I can imagine there being a case for this, but I can't say it will happen. There is a growing dissatisfaction with neodarwinian theory to explain what is the case, and a growing demand to postulate new factors to explain them. Science has already crossed the plateau of what is to be explained but now it has reached the cliff of consciousness with acute rationality and it's easy to see a demand for new scientific vehicles to travere this terrain. I think as the "old guard" dies out we might start to see some approaches made that have some similarity to religion. The westernized world also seems to be shifting toward "no religion" with supernaturalism which might steer the ship in very new directions.

 

[pitabread]

As to the cratering, it came later as a result of a cosmic battle between the fallen angels and the good angels.

Have you ever thought of thought about teaming up with Aman777 and writing stories? You guys could come with some imaginative stuff.

 

[AV1611VET]

Have you ever thought of thought about teaming up with Aman777 and writing stories? You guys could come with some imaginative stuff.

Or maybe you could get yourself a Scofield Reference Bible and read it yourself, instead of accusing us of making that up?

 

[pitabread]

Or maybe you could get yourself a Scofield Reference Bible and read it yourself, instead of accusing us of making that up?

Show me in the Bible where it explicitly describes the Moon's craters being the result of an interstellar angel war.

I'll wait.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

1. The Earth was not created with craters.

2. The Earth was created with embedded age, not embedded history. Embedded age is maturity without history. Embedded history is Omphalos.

As to the cratering, it came later as a result of a cosmic battle between the fallen angels and the good angels.

Were there mountains and river valleys? Sand? Soil or mud?

 

[AV1611VET]

Show me in the Bible where it explicitly describes the Moon's craters being the result of an interstellar angel war.

And you'll do what? believe it?

 

[AV1611VET]

Were there mountains and river valleys? Sand? Soil or mud?

Affirmative.

 

[pitabread]

And you'll do what? believe it?

I just want you to point out where it says so in the Bible. You're usually so quick with the Bible quotes after all.

 

[AV1611VET]

I just want you to point out where it says so in the Bible. You're usually so quick with the Bible quotes after all.

You know as well as I do it's not in there word-for-word.

It's an implied truth, not an expressed truth.

 

[pitabread]

You know as well as I do it's not in there word-for-word.

It's an implied truth, not an expressed truth.

Like I said, you should write stories.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Affirmative.

That's Omphalos. Glad we've got that sorted.

 

[Markstrimaran]

Because the bible describes the world going to hell, before Jesus Christ return. Were all strangers in a strange land. Think Tower of Bable. GOD does not like unity, as it breeds corruption.

 

[Tinker Grey]

The very definition of tribalism.

 

[Markstrimaran]

Every nation, tribe and toung, will stand before the throne of GOD. To give an account of their life. and what they did with Jesus.
Were definitely going to sue.
Enjoy the "Diplomatic immunity well it lasts".

 

[Ophiolite]

Every nation, tribe and toung, will stand before the throne of GOD. To give an account of their life. and what they did with Jesus.
Were definitely going to sue.
Enjoy the "Diplomatic immunity well it lasts".

What? Did you post in the correct thread? Your post has no relevance the thread.

Completely separate issue: it would be helpful if you could a spell check on your posts. It would help readers to focus on your message rather than your mistakes.

 

[pitabread]

Every nation, tribe and toung, will stand before the throne of GOD. To give an account of their life. and what they did with Jesus.
Were definitely going to sue.
Enjoy the "Diplomatic immunity well it lasts".

You appear to be in the wrong thread. Do you have anything relevant to say regarding the OP?

 

[AV1611VET]

... it would be helpful if you could a spell check on your posts.

Or a grammar checker on yours?

 

[Markstrimaran]

Because the bible describes the world going to hell, before Jesus Christ return. Were all strangers in a strange land. Think Tower of Bable. GOD does not like unity, as it breeds corruption.

I was replying guess I failed.

 

[Markstrimaran]

You appear to be in the wrong thread. Do you have anything relevant to say regarding the OP?

This threads about why Christian don't sue. I already posted my comments.

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States includes the Establishment Clause which prohibits the establishment of religion on behalf of the government. This clause has been used in cases against the teaching of creationism and ID in the past, including the Edwards v. Aguillard and Kitzmiller v. Dove Area School District trials respectively.

If creationists in the U.S. truly believe that evolution is a religious belief, surely they would be able to prove such in a court of law and have it stricken from the education system?

Modern creationist organizations currently take in millions in donations annually, so funding such a lawsuit would not be prohibitive.

Why aren't creationists willing to take the challenge to the courts?

What does Scripture say about taking things to court before unrighteous judges ?

(it says don't)