Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You don't have a clear definition, that's what I've been saying.
People will give you links. You ignore them, saying "That's not evidence."
People will copy and paste articles for you to read. You ignore them, saying "That's not evidence."
Then you strut around all of these threads going "Oh, no one can show me evidence!"
It's a puerile game.
OK, it's clear you have nothing to back the claim, or you would have told me by now. Once again, I won't ask again but for the record, take note. And not only try to learn that claiming it does not make it true, but one should not claim it if they cannot back it up...not a direct accusation like that anyway because it leaves the opposition with nothing direct to defend and show you are wrong, among other obvious things that don't make you look good.
Just to be clear on who is making stuff up please indicate which of these claims you support:Liked how you slipped right past the proof of the whopper you told. I think it's obvious to most you are making what you just said up....too.
The above rejection of evidence for evolution was written by a human with a coccyx, evidence of descent from a previous species with an actual tail.
Just to be clear on who is making stuff up please indicate which of these claims you support:
- If you put your hand in fire it will get burned.
- It is possible to put your hand in fire and not get burned.
why you ignoroed what i just said? again: even if they were able to reproduce like an animal it will not prove any evolution. do you think otherwise?
I've asked for proof and to explain why it's proof but as usual, not much of anything but excuses.
The main part of evolution, the part they haven't a clue about and seems to even fall short on excuses is how it started. The argument there is, of course, "it doesn't matter"...another convenient argument in a long line of them.
A bit like the "Science proves nothing" one of the most ridiculous comments I've aver heard, when that's just exactly what science is/does, proven explanation, while theory, is just explanation. But watch as they come in and try to argue with that...should prove entertaining.
If they didn't know where it came form, they would claim a rubber ball evolved over time, and given enough time, have a whole theory on how that happened and eventually, yep, you guessed it, start teaching the theory as fact. They would not even consider someone made it...
Or, some would assume someone made it, and for that very reason, that's how things get here, pretty simple concept. And a rubber ball is simple, but something like what we are today? Na, no maker. The more complicated the thing, the more simple it was to make, right down to it just happening with no effort at all...just the opposite of logical thinking.
The ball? someone made it, life? "Oh no, no, no one made that, it's too complicated, it must have just happened".
In my view, if they can't explain all of it, they don't have a chance in proving it at all, as that would actually prove they got no business to even bother claiming any of evolution. But though the most logical likelihood for the start of it, God, remains a straw man argument to them, it's still the most logical/likely scenario by far, even if one has no faith in God at all.
Anyway, I'm repeating myself.
The above rejection of evidence for evolution was written by a human with a coccyx, evidence of descent from a previous species with an actual tail.
... then what have they been publishing in the Journal of Evolutionary Biology all these years?
(Not to mention other scientific journals like Evolution, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Journal of Molecular Evolution, Genome Biology and Evolution, and so on...)
You are an exceptionally dishonest and devious poster. Let me remind you what you really said, not what you wish you had said:I understand. When one misses the obvious like that, they have to try to save face, so you keep on repeating what I myself already said, and feel vindicated and all if it helps.
I provided evidence that this is not always the case. You then posted:Scientific experiment: Put hand in fire, fire burns hand, I now have proof and it is no theory that when we put out hand in the fire it will get burned.
So the truth of the matter is that you only changed your claim after I refuted your initial statement and provided evidence.I can actually stick my hand in a fire for a short time and not burn it.
You are an exceptionally dishonest and devious poster. Let me remind you what you really said, not what you wish you had said:
I provided evidence that this is not always the case. You then posted:
So the truth of the matter is that you only changed your claim after I refuted your initial statement and provided evidence.
lolWe see that a lot around here, and nearly always coming from an atheist towards a Christian, but yeah, I'm a dishonest, scum of the earth Christian, and so embarrassed now. I won't get into the psychological, insecurity issues and all that go along with that general comment.
Seen this before, someone embarrasses themselves and then perpetually makes it worse by trying to get a leg up and make it all go away, while only making it much worse. All I can do is recommend you not make up things like you have tried it without protection, when the whole world could see that was a whopper..You messed up now deal with it.
I won't report you for goading but someone else might.
False, since today's Humans inherited our coccyx from the sons of God (prehistoric people) Gen 6:4 when Noah's grandsons married and produced children with them. Cush, for example, married and produced Nimrod, Gen 10:10 the builder of the first Human cities on this planet of people who descended from Apes. Nimrod changed from prehistoric to Human in just one generation. NO magical evolution needed. It's plain old descent with modification within kinds.
Right. Science gets to change the meanings of words to suit it's believers.
A good example is the FACT that Godless scientists changed "descent with modification within kinds" into the filthy word "evolution".
So kiddos, join in the name changing business and do it in the anything goes world of changeable Science. Amen?
no. i just said that this doesnt prove evolution and thats it.
but lets say for the sake of the argument that i did said it.
can you prove me wrong? can you show any calculation why it will be impossible for evolution to evolve a human from an ape for instance in only several generation? (say max 100 generation).
again: we can say the same for those cars:
they show a progression but it doesnt prove any evolution. even if they were able to reproduce like an animal. i see no difference from the whale case.
(image from Ferrari Evolution).
What did I say to insinuate a wrong definition of evidence?
I have hair too but that doen't make me an ape, or a dog, or a cat,
nor does it mean I descended from such, or them me for that matter.
Or does that mean that animals with tails descended from a full fledged human being? So many ways that could go.
Point is … regarding “life” … one either believes we were divinely created … or evolved somehow. Some even believe the planet was “seeded” by Extraterrestrials.
All are plausible.
Life is so complex … I doubt scientifically we will ever fully understand it. But in the process of trying to understand it, we do discover new things.
Stop lying. I quoted what you said. It's right there.
You DID say that. I quoted it. It's right there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?