Hey hey shem my dear

hope you in it for the long haul. My motivation is high
Heads up this is going take months of back and forth
So you have not found any truth that is void of judgement and opinion?
How does one know when a truth is void of judgement and opinion?
It can't be done.
I've taken it as an axiom that objective truth exists, but anything experienced or recorded has necessarily been filtered through a fallible human.
We can never be totally certain. If i stole from you how could you be certain something was stolen from you?
Certain in an absolute sense, I couldn't. We need to be clear about how we use terms and context.
In an absolute sense I know nothing that isn't filtered by my senses and muddied by my memory... however in the regular colloquial sense, I can be "certain" that the iconoclast stole my wallet because I saw them take it.
Im trying to get a sense of how you respond to things. Ive taken note of your reply and it may come up in the future.
Fair enough.
I was honestly perplexed by the statement, not trying to be evasive.
Cool so when you talk about the beginning of space and time, you would not be surprised if it is literally impossible to discover the exact nature of those events.
Your reply has been noted.
I feel like it's a good example of something that is truly mysterious.
If you are not certain then how can you make a decision? What were some of these reasons why you abandoned?
I'm not certain of the exact triggers. I had been exploring philosophy and taking the time to deeply analyse my reasons for believing. I was trying see if my beliefs actually made sense to me when I really thought them through.
My atheism doesn't have real conviction. It's just the acknowledgement that I don't have a positive belief in any deity.
Well dont be shy. Lets back track a bit
Icon - "What is an example of a precise and repeatable proof for evolution?"
Shem - "The pattern of genetic relatedness of living creatures matching what we would expect if they were a giant branching family."
Icon - "Individuals who belong to the same family or the same population are related because of their shared ancestry."
Shem - "yes"
So now it is time gor you to present your evidence and you do so next - kinda.
Okay.
Can you point out where you have doubts?
Do you accept that generic material is passed down from parent to child in both humans and animals?
Do you accept that genetic patterns can be used to predict how closely related different humans are? (Paternity tests and ancestry probabilities).
Could you provide some more detail and show me how this is so?
It's a consequence of inheritance and groups separating and changing independently.
It also works for other things as well, for example languages. 2000 years ago a whole lot of people across western Europe spoke Latin... but when the empire fell travel and communication across Europe was reduced so each language changed slightly year, by year until they are almost unintelligible to each other.
Genetically you can see this change happen at a rapid pace when humans force the process to speed up with selective breeding... that's how you get chihuahuas, great danes and corgis from wolves in a few thousand years.
Could you show me what proof you have to back up this point?
Wikipedia has a nice summary of the most modern study:
Computational phylogenetics
So you have trust and faith in independent repetition?
No, I'm convinced that it's a functional tool.
Then why do you call toirself atheist?
Because atheism only the statement of what one does not believe. The universe is vast and strange, some deity might exist, I can't prove that it's impossible, but I remain unconvinced.
What would convince me? You know what you wont accept, what will you accept?
I honestly don't know.
So you have not done any tests and you do not know what you consider untested?
To test something it really helps to have a clear idea about what I'm trying to test.
A lot of the time people suggest that belief will come once you already believe that it's true... which isn't very logical.
The concept of religion and God is deeply fascinating to me, but I just haven't seen a reason to believe that it's true.
So I guess I've tried the most important test:
"Do you believe that God exists?"
"I don't."