Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I've been on this board long enough to see countless people throw endless evidence at you, and to see you dismiss it all because it doesn't confirm what you already believe.I have been on this board for a while now asking for any scientific evidence that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true. So far no one has come up with anything other than the skeptics Bible which can be dealt with as a whole unit. People either have the mind of Christ or they have a reprobate mind and that is pretty much the extent of it.
Never once has anyone ever shown me evidence that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true. If you have seen so many examples then I am sure you would be glad to share some of those examples for us.I've been on this board long enough to see countless people throw endless evidence at you
Prove to me that 3 thousand years ago John the farmer didn't levitate above the ground for a full 5 minutes.Never once has anyone ever shown me evidence that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true. If you have seen so many examples then I am sure you would be glad to share some of those examples for us.
They only use science when they can make an antibiblical point with it.Either way there is still no scientific evidence that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true.
Who is "they?"They only use science when they can make an antibiblical point with it.
If they used science in the real world like they do with our beliefs, they wouldn't be employed very long.
They don't investigate before they communicate, they change words and phrases, and they don't employ their own principles (such as general relativity) to make certain passages clear in their minds.
I sometimes think that the Antichrist's 666 is actually a scientist's ???, but the Bible says otherwise, so let them keep on wondering how God did this and that, and we'll keep on explaining it to them.
They know who they are.Who is "they?"
I went through a cardiac rehab program that was heavy on exercise and diet. This is where the rubber really meets the road. Lots of CEO's are using fake science to try to convince people that their poison is good for you.If they used science in the real world like they do with our beliefs, they wouldn't be employed very long.
Who is "John the farmer"? If your talking about the Visions that Exekiel had then what evidence do you have that he did not have those visions?Prove to me that 3 thousand years ago John the farmer didn't levitate above the ground for a full 5 minutes.
A man that levitated above the ground for a full 5 minutes. And I am justified in believing it is true until you prove that it didn't happen.Who is "John the farmer"?
It's a good thing they don't stand around arguing what this or that word in their medical journals mean in Hebrew or Greek, or go around changing certain words to something else; or we'd all be in trouble.I went through a cardiac rehab program that was heavy on exercise and diet. This is where the rubber really meets the road. Lots of CEO's are using fake science to try to convince people that their poison is good for you.
A strawman.Who is "John the farmer"?
It is irrelevant what his crops were, but maybe he was! I bet he was a cornman.A strawman.
I do not understand the strawman. What does a vision have to do with scientific evidence for or against the person having the vision.A strawman.
Could you just give me the chapter and verse that you are wanting me to look at.A man that levitated above the ground for a full 5 minutes. And I am justified in believing it is true until you prove that it didn't happen.
Is that good enough for you? If it were written in a book?Could you just give me the chapter and verse that you are wanting me to look at.
LOL -- this is solid gold.Could you just give me the chapter and verse that you are wanting me to look at.
OBVIOUSLY John the levitating farmer is an analogy. joshua 1 9 said, "Never once has anyone ever shown me evidence that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true." As if that were a good reason to believe it.LOL -- this is solid gold.
I just went through a spiel with another poster who falsely accused dad of making things up; now this John the Farmer thing.
Higher academia and irony ... they go hand-in-hand.
one falsification of the fallibility of scripture is all it would take. As to flood, it doesn't say global...as to the Exodus, I recently read an article that said that archaeology just uncovered ancient remains consistent with the story...infallible...and so on and so on.OBVIOUSLY John the levitating farmer is an analogy. joshua 1 9 said, "Never once has anyone ever shown me evidence that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true." As if that were a good reason to believe it.
Okay how do we do that? We can't prove/disprove it 100%, now can we? What we can say is there is insufficient evidence for the supernatural claims made. Global flood, the Exodus, and so on.
I think it seems pretty clear in the Bible that it is talking about a global flood, but perhaps it wasn't. How can I definitively prove it? But that's the thing, isn't it? I can say, obviously the Sun can't stand still in the sky for any length of time. But that's just another one of God's miracles. We can try to show any number of scientific impossibilities and it can be waved away with little effort. You'll have to excuse us if we don't want to play the special pleading game again.one falsification of the fallibility of scripture is all it would take. As to flood, it doesn't say global...as to the Exodus, I recently read an article that said that archaeology just uncovered ancient remains consistent with the story...infallible...and so on and so on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?