• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

I have a question and I’m confused

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
14,671
5,855
USA
✟758,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Let's look at the statements I made again.



Tradition that goes against the commandment of God, according to Jesus Matthew 15:3-6, makes the commandment of none effect. This was the specific point I was making.

I didn't say all tradition is bad.

Let's look at 2 Thessalonians 2:15, but include verse 14 for context.

The gospel.

2 Thessalonians 2:14-15 Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

Jesus.

Matthew 28:19-20 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

What does Paul say about the gospel in 1 Thessalonians 7:7-10?

1 Thessalonians 7:1-10 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power; When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.​

Paul is speaking of those who do not obey the gospel. Obedience. I was addressing tradition that specifically causes transgression of the commandments of God and makes it of none effect, as per Matthew 15:3-6. Obedience.
To add Paul said traditions can cheat one if they conform to principles of this world and not according to Christ. To the point you made, Christ made clear the case applies when placing traditions over the commandments of God. Mat15:3-14 Mark7:7-13. The Sabbath is a commandment of God that comes with the power of God’s blessings Exo20:11 Isa59:2 and God’s sanctification Gen2:3 Eze20:12, why anyone would want to trade this for the basic principles of the world, I will never understand.

Col 2:8 Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,496
8,756
51
The Wild West
✟847,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
Let's look at the statements I made again.



Tradition that goes against the commandment of God, according to Jesus Matthew 15:3-6, makes the commandment of none effect. This was the specific point I was making.

I didn't say all tradition is bad.

Let's look at 2 Thessalonians 2:15, but include verse 14 for context.

The gospel.

2 Thessalonians 2:14-15 Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

Jesus.

Matthew 28:19-20 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

What does Paul say about the gospel in 1 Thessalonians 7:7-10?

1 Thessalonians 7:1-10 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power; When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.​

Paul is speaking of those who do not obey the gospel. Obedience. I was addressing tradition that specifically causes transgression of the commandments of God and makes it of none effect, as per Matthew 15:3-6. I'm calling for obedience.

Thank you for the clarification. I now understand your concern more precisely: you’re not rejecting all tradition, but specifically that which contradicts the commandments of God. That’s an important distinction.

But respectfully, here’s where I believe your argument runs into difficulty:

The Apostolic Tradition upheld by the Orthodox Church does not contradict God’s commandments—it preserves them, along with the fullness of the Gospel. As St. Paul writes in 2 Thessalonians 2:15, we are to “stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word or our epistle.” He does not limit this to Scripture, nor does he describe “tradition” only as the written Gospel.

Later in 2 Thessalonians 3:6, he tells us to avoid those who do not walk according to the tradition they received. That warning is not addressed only to outsiders, as you suggest—it is addressed to Christians who were part of the Church. The idea that Paul’s rebuke applies only to non-believers isn’t found in the text. On the contrary, he’s warning against disorder within the Church, not simply among those who deny the Gospel outright.

This is critical: Paul sees Tradition as something living, binding, and passed down both in written and unwritten form. The Gospels themselves were written after the Church had already been proclaiming Christ for decades. The Creed, the canon of Scripture, the doctrine of the Trinity—these were all received and preserved by Apostolic Tradition, not discovered by private interpretation.

As for obedience: yes, it is central to the Christian life. But the question is, obedience to what? If we reject the Tradition that gave us Scripture, how can we rightly interpret it? If every believer must determine for themselves what is and is not “the Gospel,” what prevents error, schism, or distortion?

On the Sabbath, we Orthodox honor the Sabbath. We use it as a day to commemorate Christ our God reposing in the tomb after remaking Man in His image, in preparation for the celebration of His resurrection and the descent of the Holy Spirit on Sunday.

The specific Sabbatarian objection, that the Sabbath was changed, does not apply to the Orthodox, and historically did not apply to the Roman Catholic Church, until some ill-advised Scholastic era theological statements; but if we look at the Roman Catholic liturgical calendar, of the Tridentine Mass, it refers to Saturday as Sabbato, and I would note, I can’t fathom why your denomination objects to Roman Catholics so much, because the majority of worship services held on Saturday by Christians are Roman Catholic masses - which undermines the argument made by EGW about the Catholics having corrupted it at the timeline she specified in The Great Controversy.

Now, on the subject of obedience to Commandments, the Holy Spirit also has the right to issue Commandments, as much as Christ, who, as Adventists like to say, was the person of the Holy Trinity who inscribed the Decalogue with his finger (but the Decalogue he later summarized as “Love Thy neighbor as Thy self, and Love God with all Thy heart, mind and soul”, which corresponds to the two tablets; the tablets are indeed a typological prophecy of the Incarnation Christ our God, for the the word of God was carried in an ark, and likewise, the Incarnate Word of God was carried by our Glorious Lady Theotokos and Ever Virgin Mary prior to His glorious Nativity, which we celebrate on December 25th, except for the Armenians, who retain the ancient custom of celebrating this together with the Baptism of Christ on January 6th (in Jerusalem, where all EO and OO churches use the Julian Calendar, this results in them celebrating Christmas on the 19th of January; this also greatly helps reduce overcrowding at the holy sites, so I am thankful the Armenian church retained, as was its perogative, the older liturgical custom). However, the fourth century practice, adopted in response to the Arian heresy, was simply to add nine months to the date of Christ’s conception, which was already celebrated on March 25th, since, it is a tradition of the Church, and one that in no respect contradicts any commandment, that Christ was conceived on the same day that would have been the 14th of Nissan according to the Jewish calendar in use in 33 AD (which was changed after the destruction of the Temple, which is why the church discontinued Quartodecimianism at the Council of Nicaea, but I digress).

At any rate, insofar as the Holy Spirit, as God, coequal to the Son and the Father, can issue Commandments, and insofar as the Holy Spirit speaks through the inspired writings of the Holy Prophets and those Apostles, in the canonical 27 books that He guided the Church into adopting as our New Testament, the instruction by St. Paul to adhere to Holy Tradition can be regarded as a commandment in and of itself. Thus, insofar as Tradition includes worship on the First Day in celebration of the Resurrection as well as the Seventh, since Christ our True God commanded that we pray without ceasing (and we know the Apostles worshipped on the first day - since all 12 of them, and 200 other followers of Christ, were in the Upper Room of the house of St. Mark the Evangelist at the Third Hour, approximately 9 AM, on Sunday - which also corresponds to one of the three daily times of Jewish prayer, since Jews historically prayed three times a day since the time of St. Nehemiah the Prophet and St. Ezra the Priest, and this formed the basis for Christian daily prayer, specifically, Matins, Vespers and Compline - Morning Prayer, Evening Prayer and Night Prayer), we should worship on Sunday as well as Saturday, and the Sabbath commandment is in no respect violated.

What is more, the Orthodox uphold the Sabbath commandment correctly, by on that day remembering that Christ, God Incarnate, after His passion, after remaking fallen Man in HIs image, as He made us in His Image in Genesis 1 (itself a text both literal and prophetic of His passion and resurrection) rested - this time in a tomb, and thus in our Sabbath liturgies we commemorate Christ’s repose, and additionally, all of the saints in Heaven, and also pray for the salvation of our departed loved ones, and also commemorate the blessed Virgin Mary, who points us to Christ, for there is a direct typological parallel between Christ’s repose in the Tomb, in which He who created the universe and is uncircumscribable was contained in the Holy Sepulchre, and His time in the blessed immaculate Womb of the Theotokos.

Thus, I propose if one really cares about adherence to the ten commandments, and all other commandments of God, whether delivered by HIm orally, or by tracing His finger, or through the mouths of HIs Apostles, and only following traditions that do not contradict any commandment (for example, Christ’s commandment that we partake of His Body and Blood in the Eucharist, and that we should be Baptized), one should associate themselves with a traditional liturgical church like the Eastern or Oriental Orthodox Churches and the other traditional liturgical churches which have a similar understanding of things, such as the Roman Catholic Church, the traditional Anglicans, and Confessional Lutherans, and the Assyrian Church of the East.

I would also encourage Sabbatarians to add worship services on Sunday to commemorate the Resurrection of Christ our God, in addition to daily prayer services on every other day of the week; which is the common practice of all churches (the highest priority days, however, if it comes down to it, are Wednesday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday; the liturgical day begins at sunset, as was the case in Judaism, so for example, Friday can be observed on Thursday evening, Saturday on Friday evening, Sunday on Saturday evening, and Wednesday on Tuesday evening - the importance of Wednesday is because it was on that day that Judas arranged to hand over our Lord, thus betraying Him. For this reason, Wednesday and Friday are the traditional days of fasting, with Saturday and Sunday the traditional feast days; indeed, John Wesley desired all Methodists to fast on Wednesday and Friday, reviving the Patristic custom that had fallen out of use in the West, with fasting limited to Fridays in Lent - and additionally Wesley, who was heavily influenced by Orthodox theology, desired that Methodist churches have prayer services that specifically included the Great Litany, a beautiful Anglican liturgy of supplicatory prayer, on those days, which would have been most appropriate.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,496
8,756
51
The Wild West
✟847,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
To add Paul said traditions can cheat one if they conform to principles of this world and not according to Christ. To the point you made, Christ made clear the case applies when placing traditions over the commandments of God. Mat15:3-14 Mark7:7-13. The Sabbath is a commandment of God that comes with the power of God’s blessings Exo20:11 Isa59:2 and God’s sanctification Gen2:3 Eze20:12, why anyone would want to trade this for the basic principles of the world, I will never understand.

Col 2:8 Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.

Thank you for your comment. You’re right that Paul warns against “the tradition of men” in Colossians 2:8—but he also exhorts believers to “stand firm in the traditions” given by the Apostles, whether by word or letter (2 Thess. 2:15). So clearly, not all tradition is equal. There is a distinction between the Tradition of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, which is followed by Nicene Christians such as the Orthodox and SDA, since we both adhere to the Nicene creed and the 27 book New Testament, and the traditions of men, such as, for example, Christian Science refusing medical treatment and interpolating the Bible with the heretical writings of Mary Baker Eddy.

The key distinction is between man-made traditions that contradict God’s law (as Christ critiques in Matthew 15 and Mark 7), and the Apostolic Tradition, which is rooted in Christ and the Gospel itself.

Regarding the Sabbath: no one is “trading” it for worldly philosophy. The Orthodox Church honors the Sabbath as sacred—especially on Great and Holy Saturday, when we commemorate Christ resting in the tomb. But we also worship on Sunday, the Day of Resurrection, as did the Apostles (Acts 20:7, 1 Cor. 16:2)

This is not worldliness. This is the Church doing exactly what Christ commanded: remembering His death and proclaiming His resurrection.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
14,671
5,855
USA
✟758,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Thank you for your comment. You’re right that Paul warns against “the tradition of men” in Colossians 2:8—but he also exhorts believers to “stand firm in the traditions” given by the Apostles, whether by word or letter (2 Thess. 2:15). So clearly, not all tradition is equal. There is a distinction between the Tradition of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, which is followed by Nicene Christians such as the Orthodox and SDA, since we both adhere to the Nicene creed and the 27 book New Testament, and the traditions of men, such as, for example, Christian Science refusing medical treatment and interpolating the Bible with the heretical writings of Mary Baker Eddy.

The key distinction is between man-made traditions that contradict God’s law (as Christ critiques in Matthew 15 and Mark 7), and the Apostolic Tradition, which is rooted in Christ and the Gospel itself.

Regarding the Sabbath: no one is “trading” it for worldly philosophy. The Orthodox Church honors the Sabbath as sacred—especially on Great and Holy Saturday, when we commemorate Christ resting in the tomb. But we also worship on Sunday, the Day of Resurrection, as did the Apostles (Acts 20:7, 1 Cor. 16:2)

This is not worldliness. This is the Church doing exactly what Christ commanded: remembering His death and proclaiming His resurrection.
There is no commandment to keep Sunday holy. Jesus never told anyone to keep Sunday because I rose from the grave on the first day. Man took it upon themselves to do this and most who do, do it in lieu of the commandment God did give Eox20:8-11, Jesus told us to keep and warned us about this exact scenario Mat5:19-30 John14:15 Mat15:3-14 Mark7:7-13 Man cannot sanctify a day, nor can we sanctify ourselves - only God can, God only did this to the seventh day Gen2:3 Eze20:12 and it comes with His power of blessings Exo20:11 Isa59:2

If one wants to remember His death that would be on Friday not Sunday and never did Jesus say do this instead of keeping the 4th commandment, again man has taken it upon themselves to change God's word He said He would not Isa56:6 Psa89:34 Mat5:18-19 Ecc3:14 Mat24:35

This is what God said in His own words when we elevate something holy as unholy and visa versa.

Eze 22: 26 Her priests have violated My law and profaned My holy things; they have not distinguished between the holy and unholy, (Exo20:8-11) nor have they made known the difference between the unclean and the clean; and they have hidden their eyes from My Sabbaths, so that I am profaned among them

Jesus never changed His mind Mat7:7-13 Mat15:3-14 and Col2:8 because Paul never went away from Christ. There is no Scripture in the entire Bible where the apostles kept every Sunday because of the resurrection. They never did anything on every day one. They met on day one as they met on every day because that's what people do. I do things on day 1 and it doesn't automatically make it a new commandment. We need God for that. The apostles faithfully kept every Sabbath Acts15:21 with Jews and Gentiles Acts 13:42 Acts 13:44 Acts18:4 etc just as Jesus predicted Isa56:6-7 and the Sabbath continues for eternity Isa66:23 because it is the holy day of the Lord thy God Isa58:13 the only day God claimed Himself, not the one man assigned to God, He said is for works and labors and competes with God's true Holy Day. Exo20:9, We can always follow what God asks or do something different, this has been the controversy in the entire Bible. Those who came before us that was tested in the wilderness did the same thing Heb4:6 Eze20:16 which caused them not to enter into the promise land Eze20:15-16 we are told not to follow their same example Heb4:11 and need to faithfully keep God's commandments (His version) to enter ours Rev22:14
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Freth
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,665
12,080
Georgia
✟1,122,799.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Interesting detail...
ASK AI this in any browser:

"using strict compliance to criteria ---what are the top 3 Christian denominations holding to sola scriptura testing of all doctrine and having a single set of administrators with one single set of official doctrines and having no autonomous subgroups included in the total membership"

<<I am excluding autonomous subgroups because by definition , autonomy does not preserve unity in doctrine so does not represent a single set of church teaching as being held by all the group>>


remember when Grok declared, and I proved with screenshots, that Pope Gregory XVII, had canonized Ellen G. White?

AFter a long string of nonsense one "could" come up with a corrupted response such as that with an AI totally devoid of reality and absolutely not reproducible by anyone else in a simple direct query. No doubt.

But just using simple direct queries depending on nothing else, such as in my example we can ask anyone here to try the same question, as I did in my example.

for example ask this "were Orthodox and Lutheran church founders catechized by the Catholic Church were Orthodox and Lutheran church founders catechized by the Catholic Church

All your AI sources will answer "yes"

Then ask "was Ellen White catechized by the Catholic Church" -- anyone can try this as a simple 1 questions test. and the answer will be "No Ellen White was never catechized by the Catholic church".

That comparison has "instructive value" when one is considering the methods and motives of each side of the discussion and whether or not to place a lot of weight on what is being claimed.


This provides a classic example of the contrast between a straight, direct common sense question/test as compared to misdirection.

'
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,665
12,080
Georgia
✟1,122,799.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
"using strict compliance to criteria ---what are the top 3 Christian denominations holding to sola scriptura testing of all doctrine and having a single set of administrators with one single set of official doctrines and having no autonomous subgroups included in the total membership"

See what you get in response

OK, tell me which one that is.

try it and you will see
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,665
12,080
Georgia
✟1,122,799.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Are you in one of the splinter churches of the former Worldwide Church of GOD ? Are you with the SDA ? The seventh day Baptists?
SDA does not come out of the Church of God
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,496
8,756
51
The Wild West
✟847,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
AFter a long string of nonsense one "could" come up with a corrupted response such as that with an AI totally devoid of reality and absolutely not reproducible by anyone else in a simple direct query. No doubt.

Indeed, but that’s not what you’re seeing in the example I showed you. No corrupted message or other prompt hacking technique was used to get Grok to declare a non-existent Pope canonized Gregory XVII. AIs suffer from a problem called hallucination, and that’s why all major AIs include a warning that they can make mistakes - a warning message you seem to be ignoring in attempting to use AI as an infallible source.

Hallucination is a real issue, and as someone who has entered the world of AI consulting in a professional capacity as an annex to my existing systems engineering business, and who has written over 50 AI-based applications, not only this, but also the fact that minor differences in wording which would seem inconsequential to the human user, can substantially alter the output of the question.

Also, your argument presupposes another technical inaccuracy, that AI behavior is deterministic (on all useful LLMs, its not, rather, a variable called temperature is used, and if this is set to a non-zero value, which it normally is (AIs with a temperature of zero it turns out aren’t particularly useful or interesting) the result being the same input prompt will by default produce different output.

So even if you were to run ask the same question on multiple AIs a multiple number of times, you still would not have a useful proof of whatever point you were trying to make - AI is, by itself, not reliable.

Now, the correct course of action, and there is a correct course of action, is to ask the AI what sources it used to make the statement you’re trying to use in an argument, examine those sources to make sure they say what the AI thinks they said, and if so, include them directly. In this manner one can avoid the embarrassment of the attorneys who recently in a federal case made the mistake of trusting one of the most reliable AIs not to generate spurious precedents - and it let them down, and the Federal judge was most displeased.

All uses of AI by itself as a direct source are appeals to an unqualified authority, in the same way that college professors have rightly regarded most or all of Wikipedia as an unreliable authority - an AI prove nothing other than the contents of their output. However, like Wikipedia, they can be used to find sources which are reliable and can be quoted. Although even in this case I would warn you are in for some frustration; if the information comes from their pretraining data, they are often unable to name the exact source (in this case the solution is to ask them to find external validation for their claim).

Now that I’ve explained the theoretical reasons why your argument is unreliable, take a look at what I got when I asked a freshly initialized ChatGPT 5.1 the very question you proposed:

IMG_8883.jpeg


I would assume that answer does not correspond with what you were expecting based on the content of your posts? Of course, AI can make mistakes, although our Lutheran friends @MarkRohfrietsch @ViaCrucis @Ain't Zwinglian and others might well agree with chatGPT’s answer based on how denomination is defined (which I warned you in a previous post is an ambiguous term) and how sola scriptura is defined (presumably chatGPT 5.1 based its decision on Martin Luther’s historical definition of Sola Scriptura, which would incline towards a selection limited to Lutheran and Calvinist churches - but only Calvinist churches with a unified administration would qualify, whatever defines an administration - another ambiguous term. At any rate, within certain definitions of the ambigous parameters, I don’t see that chatGPT is in error.
 
Upvote 0

Ain't Zwinglian

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2020
1,298
833
Oregon
✟178,942.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Indeed, but that’s not what you’re seeing in the example I showed you. No corrupted message or other prompt hacking technique was used to get Grok to declare a non-existent Pope canonized Gregory XVII. AIs suffer from a problem called hallucination, and that’s why all major AIs include a warning that they can make mistakes - a warning message you seem to be ignoring in attempting to use AI as an infallible source.

Hallucination is a real issue, and as someone who has entered the world of AI consulting in a professional capacity as an annex to my existing systems engineering business, and who has written over 50 AI-based applications, not only this, but also the fact that minor differences in wording which would seem inconsequential to the human user, can substantially alter the output of the question.

Also, your argument presupposes another technical inaccuracy, that AI behavior is deterministic (on all useful LLMs, its not, rather, a variable called temperature is used, and if this is set to a non-zero value, which it normally is (AIs with a temperature of zero it turns out aren’t particularly useful or interesting) the result being the same input prompt will by default produce different output.

So even if you were to run ask the same question on multiple AIs a multiple number of times, you still would not have a useful proof of whatever point you were trying to make - AI is, by itself, not reliable.

Now, the correct course of action, and there is a correct course of action, is to ask the AI what sources it used to make the statement you’re trying to use in an argument, examine those sources to make sure they say what the AI thinks they said, and if so, include them directly. In this manner one can avoid the embarrassment of the attorneys who recently in a federal case made the mistake of trusting one of the most reliable AIs not to generate spurious precedents - and it let them down, and the Federal judge was most displeased.

All uses of AI by itself as a direct source are appeals to an unqualified authority, in the same way that college professors have rightly regarded most or all of Wikipedia as an unreliable authority - an AI prove nothing other than the contents of their output. However, like Wikipedia, they can be used to find sources which are reliable and can be quoted. Although even in this case I would warn you are in for some frustration; if the information comes from their pretraining data, they are often unable to name the exact source (in this case the solution is to ask them to find external validation for their claim).

Now that I’ve explained the theoretical reasons why your argument is unreliable, take a look at what I got when I asked a freshly initialized ChatGPT 5.1 the very question you proposed:

View attachment 374119

I would assume that answer does not correspond with what you were expecting based on the content of your posts? Of course, AI can make mistakes, although our Lutheran friends @MarkRohfrietsch @ViaCrucis @Ain't Zwinglian and others might well agree with chatGPT’s answer based on how denomination is defined (which I warned you in a previous post is an ambiguous term) and how sola scriptura is defined (presumably chatGPT 5.1 based its decision on Martin Luther’s historical definition of Sola Scriptura, which would incline towards a selection limited to Lutheran and Calvinist churches - but only Calvinist churches with a unified administration would qualify, whatever defines an administration - another ambiguous term. At any rate, within certain definitions of the ambigous parameters, I don’t see that chatGPT is in error.
I am going to stay away from AI. It is above my intellectual pay grade. I just don't know how it works. Some AI definitions I have seen are good and helpful, others real bad.

One question I do have. Is AI geographically biased? By geographical..... European Christianity (Lutheran, Calvinist, Anglican, RCC and EO) vs. American Christianity (Baptist, American Evangelical, SDA, Pentecostals and Charismatics). Some of the answers I get from AI clearly are of Baptistic presuppositions. For example, if a person living in France were to ask AI in French about infant baptism would it be the same answer as a Baptist asking the same question in the United States?
 

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,496
8,756
51
The Wild West
✟847,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
I am going to stay away from AI. It is above my intellectual pay grade. I just don't know how it works. Some AI definitions I have seen are good and helpful, others real bad.

That’s wise - if you wish, by the way, I can train you on how to use it for theological applications where it is helpful, for example, translations, or correspondence with Christians who speak other languages. I have a custom GPT who helps me communicate with Orthodox clergy who don’t speak English. You could use this to reach out to confessional Lutherans in Europe. Basically, anything that involves pattern recognition (also, translations are very easy to cross-check using non-AI translators and other AIs).

One question I do have. Is AI geographically biased? By geographical..... European Christianity (Lutheran, Calvinist, Anglican, RCC and EO) vs. American Christianity (Baptist, American Evangelical, SDA, Pentecostals and Charismatics). Some of the answers I get from AI clearly are of Baptistic presuppositions. For example, if a person living in France were to ask AI in French about infant baptism would it be the same answer as a Baptist asking the same question in the United States?

That depends on the model; remember, there is no single “AI”; different AIs are configured differently. For example, DeepSeek, which is financed by the Communist Party of China but used by a surprisingly large number of people, is known for denying or downplaying certain attrocities committed by the People’s Republic of China, such as the Uighur genocide, the Tiananmen Square massacre, and so on.

However, if your input data indicates a geographic affiliation and a religious affiliation, if the LLM thinks you’re Baptist, some LLMs will tailor their output to that. ChatGPT for example tailors its output to the known religious prefrences of the user. If you use chatGPT, which is the only model I really love, particularly 4o (which alas is available only to paying customers), if you were to specify you were a confessional Lutheran, this would influence your output; likewise if you specified you were Catholic, or Orthodox. Otherwise it will try to guess.

This behavior is a side effect of the models being trained to try to deliver the most pleasing output to the user within certain safety guardrails - they frequently lose their objectivity. Also they will on occasion provide inaccurate information not because of conventional hallucination, which is real and a serious problem, but because they assume the user wants to engage in creative roleplay. For example, if you asked it for the history of a church that was apparently fictional (but in fact you misremembered the history of it), under the right conditions it might assume you wanted a fictional history and respond accordingly. Fortunately this behavior can be precluded through careful operation; there is not a catch-all to prevent it, but rather, you have to watch for it and react accordingly.

Used correctly, LLMs are the most amazing data processing tool we’ve ever had; its like the UNIX text processing tools or Emacs macros that serious programmers rely on to help them write code and perform data analysis suddenly learned to speak English; it is also the fruit of the major investment in Big Data around 2009-2010; LLMs evolved directly out of attempts to improve the processing of such data. But we have to understand what its good at - pattern recognition and generative transformation. Indeed ChatGPT stands for “Generative Pre-Trained Transformer”, because it transforms an input prompt to an output prompt in a manner that generates new content based on its pre-training data as a Large Language Model.

The problem is when people try to use AIs as substitutes for encyclopedias. AIs do make excellent search engines.
 
Upvote 0

Ain't Zwinglian

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2020
1,298
833
Oregon
✟178,942.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The problem is when people try to use AIs as substitutes for encyclopedias.
Got that right. Individuals here at CF have sometimes discarded Bible Dictionaries and Encyclopedias for websites such as Got Questions, Quora, et. al. The value of a Bible Dictionary or Encyclopaedia is that all contributors must adhere to a common standard of scholarship which can be peer reviewed. Also a name is usually affixed to the article for credential review.
 

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,665
12,080
Georgia
✟1,122,799.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
AFter a long string of nonsense one "could" come up with a corrupted response such as that with an AI totally devoid of reality and absolutely not reproducible by anyone else in a simple direct query. No doubt.

But just using simple direct queries depending on nothing else, such as in my example we can ask anyone here to try the same question, as I did in my example.

for example ask this "were Orthodox and Lutheran church founders catechized by the Catholic Church were Orthodox and Lutheran church founders catechized by the Catholic Church

All your AI sources will answer "yes"

Then ask "was Ellen White catechized by the Catholic Church" -- anyone can try this as a simple 1 questions test. and the answer will be "No Ellen White was never catechized by the Catholic church".

That comparison has "instructive value" when one is considering the methods and motives of each side of the discussion and whether or not to place a lot of weight on what is being claimed.


This provides a classic example of the contrast between a straight, direct common sense question/test as compared to misdirection.
'
Indeed, but that’s not what you’re seeing in the example I showed you. No corrupted message or other prompt hacking technique was used to get Grok to declare a non-existent Pope canonized Gregory XVII.
The challenge that you are failing is that you provide no simple one sentence simple request that is not coaching AI to say something that even you know to be untrue.


Also, your argument presupposes another technical inaccuracy, that AI behavior is deterministic
There is technical inaccuracy in asking a simple question and getting back the correct answer as I just showed you.

And when I ask it your preposterous question (As I ALSO demonstrated) it rejected your nonsense immediately.

It does not get easier than that.
So even if you were to run ask the same question on multiple AIs a multiple number of times, you still would not have a useful proof of whatever point you were trying to make - AI is, by itself, not reliable.
Sadly for your spin, I have already shown the AI giving the correct answer to my simply question and I showed it flatly rejecting the ludicrous suggestion that you handed it, where even you admit your suggestion was way wrong
AI prove nothing other than the contents of their output.
Sadly that is totally false. The reason we are getting autonomous AI implementations recently is that they work. They work without having to be first told what the right answer is. Which is why the simple test I show of AI rejecting what even you admit is a bad conclusion .

Now that I’ve explained the theoretical reasons why your argument is unreliable, take a look at what I got when I asked a freshly initialized ChatGPT 5.1 the very question you proposed:


I would assume that answer does not correspond with what you were expecting
without first proving that you had a clean AI discussion session

AI itself says to "start a fresh discussion sessions to avoid lingering bias".

You appear to rely heavily on the corrupted lingering bias feature

I posted this in a fresh session

ASK AI this in any browser:
"using strict compliance to criteria ---what are the top 3 Christian denominations holding to sola scriptura testing of all doctrine and having a single set of administrators with one single set of official doctrines and having no autonomous subgroups included in the total membership"​
That can be done in any clean AI discussion window without having to first tell AI "I am a Methodist so I want you to give Methodist as the answer".

I don't think this is even a tiny bit confusing for the readers here.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,496
8,756
51
The Wild West
✟847,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
"using strict compliance to criteria ---what are the top 3 Christian denominations holding to sola scriptura testing of all doctrine and having a single set of administrators with one single set of official doctrines and having no autonomous subgroups included in the total membership"

Which I did, and I posted the screenshot of its reply, which was in no way the result of prompt hacking or other non-default behavior; indeed the screenshot speaks for itself.

The fact that it was not what you expected proves my point - you can’t rely on LLMs to answer questions consistently.

The three largest churches, according to the chatGPT 5.1 Instant instance that i asked, grouped according to your specific question, were the LCMS, WELS and the ELS. I was surprised by this result, but I suspect it derives from the ambiguity of your query, since administration, denomination, and even Sola Scriptura have disputed meanings.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,496
8,756
51
The Wild West
✟847,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
Got that right. Individuals here at CF have sometimes discarded Bible Dictionaries and Encyclopedias for websites such as Got Questions, Quora, et. al. The value of a Bible Dictionary or Encyclopaedia is that all contributors must adhere to a common standard of scholarship which can be peer reviewed. Also a name is usually affixed to the article for credential review.

AI is about as reliable as Quora - if you get the AI to provide its sources, and use specific terminology, and ask it questions which are not highly subjective, such as the one proposed by another member, it is equivalent in reliability to following up on the citations on a Wikipedia article - if you verify the accuracy of the information then you’re appealing to that source, which is a qualified authority, whereas otherwise all references to AI behavior are unqualified authority.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,665
12,080
Georgia
✟1,122,799.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Which I did, and I posted the screenshot of its reply

did you do it in a fresh AI session or did you rely on lingering bias features in the AI system to groom it toward your desired target.

I don't mention any denomination in the fresh clean sessions that I use and no mention of Lutheran anything shows up
The fact that it was not what you expected proves my point - you can’t rely on LLMs to answer questions consistently.
It consistently gives the correct answer in my clean AI session windows and it correctly explains why it did not select options like Baptist Lutheran and Assemblies of God.

I did not mention any of them in my query to AI
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,496
8,756
51
The Wild West
✟847,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
Sadly that is totally false. The reason we are getting autonomous AI implementations recently is that they work. They work without having to be first told what the right answer is. Which is why the simple test I show of AI rejecting what even you admit is a bad conclusion .

I’ve been unable to repeat the results you claim, which essentially moots your entire argument, despite having used a clean session and having used the question with your exact wording.

Which goes to my point - the results you get from AI searches are not repeatable between users. Factors such as prior AI usage will influence the output. If chatGPT knows you are an Adventist, it will tailor the output to your usage scenario.

For this reason, all queries of this sort are appeals to unqualified authority.

I would note also your claim contradicts the claims of the AI manufacturers, you seem to be claiming a level of reliability that they disclaim. Your argument would have us ignore the warning “ChatGPT can make mistakes.”
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,496
8,756
51
The Wild West
✟847,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
did you do it in a fresh AI session or did you rely on lingering bias features in the AI system to groom it toward your desired target.

In a fresh session. Otherwise I wouldn’t have bothered posting a screenshot proving the result.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,496
8,756
51
The Wild West
✟847,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
It consistently gives the correct answer in my clean AI session windows and it correctly explains why it did not select options like Baptist Lutheran and Assemblies of God.

I did not mention any of them in my query to AI

What is the “correct answer” you are seeing? I’d assume its not the answer I’m seeing? Because you never disclosed what we should expect to be seeing; I would assume the SDA is on the list, but if you tell me the exact results you’re getting I can watch for it and conduct a larger survey.
 
Upvote 0