Here is a good article--a transcript from an interview:
>>>
Louise: Lundy, your work focuses on the fact that abusers have control over their actions. How much control do their victims have over their partner's actions?
LundyBancroft: This is a crucial question, Louise. The abuser tends to make the woman feel that if she would just work harder, be more perfect, take better care of his needs, be sensitive to his every emotion, and so forth, then he wouldn't explode and turn mean. But it doesn't work. You can only manage an abuser for brief periods of time. Working hard to cater to him may get you through this hour or this day or maybe even this week, but sooner or later he's going to get mean and start bullying you again.
Louise: You've written that abuse has more to do with an abuser’s mindset than with his history or his feelings – for example, you say abusers aren’t abusive because they’re angry, they’re angry because they’re abusive. Could you expand on that and why it’s so important for women to know?
LundyBancroft: The anger issue is closely related to the previous question. Many people believe that if they can figure out what is making the man so angry, he won't explode. But his anger isn't his problem -- in fact, there are people with huge anger problems who don't get mean or abusive -- they're just angry all the time. (Which isn't good either, but it isn't the same thing as being mean or controlling.)
His problem is that he thinks he has the right to control the woman's life, that he looks down on her as inferior to him, and that he thinks her life should revolve around doing things for him -- that she shouldn't have needs and a life of her own. So making him less angry isn't going to change how he treats his partner, because he'll still have all those terrible attitudes. Some abusers can be extremely cruel without getting angry at all. So the anger is really a red herring.
Another way to think about it is this: If you expect a woman to be a perfect, servile, unquestioning person whose life is completely devoted to meeting your needs, and who has no needs of her own, aren't you going to be angry all the time? Because no woman could live up to that (and no woman should have to).
Louise: Why do you think abuse often starts or worsens around pregnancy/new birth?
LundyBancroft: Because a pregnant woman, and the mother of a newborn, has to focus on her own needs and the needs of the this new growing life. She can't be devoting her life to taking care of her man. He's got to grow up and take care of himself during this stage in life -- but the abuser often refuses to do that, and continues demanding attention and catering. So he becomes worse than no help -- he's actually contributing to the stress and demand of this difficult time.
Louise: Mothers who stay with their abusers face a lot of victim blaming, what are your comments on that?
LundyBancroft: There's no easy answer for the abused mother. Children don't want to lose their father, they just want his abusiveness and violence to stop. If she leaves him, she also faces economic hardships that could drag her away from her children - she might have to start working full time, for example, which could be a big loss for her and her kids if that wasn't the case before. Children who are living with an abuser in their lives NEED THEIR MOTHERS.
And what if leaving him would actually mean she has less time to spend with the kids? It's hard to say if that's best. And then, the abuser is going to get visitation time, so suddenly the kids will be away from her whole weekends, half the day on their birthdays, half the day on holidays including the big religious holidays, and so forth. And finally, when his visitation starts, he's suddenly getting all this time alone with them where she has no way to keep an eye on what he's doing with them. So I think there are good reasons to leave and good reasons to stay, and we really need to respect the choices mothers make in these horrible binds.[full article here:
http://www.pandys.org/lundybancroft-transcript.html]