• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

I give up

Karl - Liberal Backslider

Senior Veteran
Jul 16, 2003
4,157
297
58
Chesterfield
Visit site
✟35,947.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Dayton said:
There are no transitional humans. There are no transitional species. Macro-evolution is a myth.

On another thread, I posted a list of transitional species. You have not refuted them.

Either explain why they are not transitionals or STOP LYING ABOUT IT!
 
Upvote 0

Karl - Liberal Backslider

Senior Veteran
Jul 16, 2003
4,157
297
58
Chesterfield
Visit site
✟35,947.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Nathan Poe said:
Sure we can; it's called "extinction."

Indeed. And we have plenty of evidence that until very recently there were other hominid species coexisting with us - neanderthals only disappeared 30,000 years ago.

Back two million years ago, you could have found A. robustus, A. boisei, possibly some A. africanus and H. habilis scratching a living in Africa.

It just happens that way. My father in law is the last male in his line, and has no sons. I'm the last male in my line. Some friends of mine have lots of brothers and paternal line cousins.
 
Upvote 0

Siliconaut

Not to be confused with the other Norman Hartnell
@wblastyn:
So the other hominds were made extinct by homo sapiens? Did humans kill the other hominids or was it more indirect competiton?

A mixture of both. There have most probably been clashes between h. sapiens and h. neanterthaliensis, but I don't subscribe to he idea of a simple mass genocide. H. sapiens just usurped all the ecological niches of the neanderthals. Pushed further and further out of the good hunting grounds into fringe regions, h. neanderthaliensis eventually dwindled away and died out.

There was another theory I remember, namely that h. neanderthaliensis interbred with h. sapiens and was "assimilated" by us ("We Are The Borg. Resistance Is Futile..."), but this has been falsified in the last years through DNA research.
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
Siliconaut said:
@wblastyn:
A mixture of both. There have most probably been clashes between h. sapiens and h. neanterthaliensis, but I don't subscribe to he idea of a simple mass genocide. H. sapiens just usurped all the ecological niches of the neanderthals. Pushed further and further out of the good hunting grounds into fringe regions, h. neanderthaliensis eventually dwindled away and died out.

I can see genocide having happened when a couple of tribes attack one another, unless Neandertal man was totally like, passive and peacelike and stuff, in which case they interbred with sapiens and are the only plausible explanation for hippies.
 
Upvote 0

Cantuar

Forever England
Jul 15, 2002
1,085
4
72
Visit site
✟31,389.00
Faith
Agnostic
Evolution is NOT a fact, it is still theoretical with some coincidental evidence that may or may not prove macro-evolution.

Evolution IS a fact. The theory of evolution by variation and selection is an explanation of the fact of evolution via descent with modification from common ancestors. Theories aren't facts; theories explain facts. Science is about explanations - so science is about theories. If you haven't gathered by now on this board that in science, theories aren't some sort of wild speculative guesswork that's somehow inferior to facts, you either haven't understood what the scientifically literate posters have been saying or you're discounting it because you think you know more about science than the scientists.
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
Badfish said:
Evolution is NOT a fact, it is still theoretical with some coincidental evidence that may or may not prove macro-evolution.

I think you are saying it's a fact because your emotions are telling you to say that, when honestly you know it's not a fact, a fact has to have 100% truth and support.

you do realise don't you badfish, that all creationist models require far more rapid evolution than a biologist would ever suggest, since not only do you have a limit of 6000 years, but you also have a flood that killed everything. If you tried suggesting that some "horse kind" evolved into zebras, donkeys, horses and so on.... and a "cat kind" evolved into lions leopards, tigers pumas and lynxes, and that a "dolphin kind" evolved into porpoises killer whales, blue whales and so on all within about 2000 years or so, then they would just laugh at you. there is no evidence for any of this kind of hyper rapid evolution at all... and why has it all come to a lurching halt all of a sudden? where is all the piles of evidence that there should be? Did the chinese forget to write it down? perhaps their mythical dragons and so on were a primordial " deer-camel-snake-cockle-carp-eagle-tiger-ox" kind in which case why can't tigers breed with carp?..... did the egyptions forget to note the fact that they were worshipping cats... no, it just changed it's not a cat, it's a smaller cat, apart from those over there that are turning into lions... and those that are growing stripes... and the others that have spots and run fast... what do we call those.. lepions? which one do we worship now *insert heiroglyphic of very confused egyptian scratching his head*

do you see the problems?
 
Upvote 0

LadyShea

Humanist
Aug 29, 2002
1,216
5
56
Nevada
Visit site
✟1,749.00
Faith
Atheist
myth n.

A traditional, typically ancient story dealing with supernatural beings, ancestors, or heroes that serves as a fundamental type in the worldview of a people, as by explaining aspects of the natural world or delineating the psychology, customs, or ideals of society

Hmm, which has talking snakes, giants, talking donkeys, supernatural non biological entities mating with humans, 900 year old men, women being turned into pillars of salt and an impossible story of a boat with millions of animals on it...The Bible or the Theory of Evolution? Double hmmm...which of these elements do not meet the criteria for myth?
 
Upvote 0
LadyShea said:
Hmm, which has talking snakes, giants, talking donkeys, supernatural non biological entities mating with humans, 900 year old men, women being turned into pillars of salt and an impossible story of a boat with millions of animals on it...The Bible or the Theory of Evolution? Double hmmm...which of these elements do not meet the criteria for myth?


Actually , evolution does have a talking monkey , does that count?
 
Upvote 0

Siliconaut

Not to be confused with the other Norman Hartnell
@weboffin:
All this science babble talk sounds like Vulcans on Star Trek.
Argument from ignorance. If you have any questions regarding this "babble", just pose them and we'll answer them to the best of our knowledge. Most of us aren't scientists, and if we stupid heathen buggers can grasp certain concepts, so can you.
 
Upvote 0