• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

I can not find any denomination I belong to

Ezekiel 1820

New Member
Oct 18, 2017
4
1
35
Sydney
✟23,720.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Hello

I am not looking to debate in this thread.

This is my first post, I would incredibly appreciate if someone could point me to a direction where similar views to my beliefs are shared. I can not call myself a 'Christian' because of certain doctrinal rejections and therefore I find it impossible to associate with any single movement within contemporary Christendom.

Brothers and Sisters, my beliefs may offend, but please show me the courtesy and respect that Jesus showed to everyone else.

I believe in:
Jesus is the Messiah
Jesus did not abolish or 'abrogate' the Laws, in fact he reinforced their importance.
I believe 'inspired' biblical text does not equate to inerrancy, in fact even the most conservative scholars accept early NT manuscripts are jam packed with errors/omissions/fabrications.
Jesus came to reform Judaism and give essence to the empty robotic rule following.
Jesus will have a second coming
Jewish law was never made void and Jesus never intended that people should start a new religion worshipping him as God. ("Why do you call me good...?")

I do not believe:
That Paul was an apostle, either he was deceived or was the deceiver. (Blasphemous to most Christians and therefore out of respect I do not call myself a Christian)
The rejection of Paul then ultimately leads to:
Rejection of Atonement
Rejection of Faith without work (as emphasised by James [ALWAYS forcefully misinterpreted by mainstream Christianity to reconcile with Paul, at least Martin Luther knew it was a contradiction])
Rejection of Christ's divinity
Rejection of any hypostatic union or any other technical theory relating to the nature/s of Jesus
Rejection of the Trinity (God is one [1] [o.n.e] in every way with no other numbers are associated with him)
Rejection of Original sin


Basically, I'm a Messianic Jew minus Pauline Christianity. Do I belong anywhere or will I forever be an individual without a congregation?
 
  • Prayers
Reactions: EmmaCat

Little Lantern

Be encouraged! Christ has overcome the world!
Site Supporter
Sep 14, 2017
2,773
3,150
USA
✟268,608.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Greetings and welcome to CF, @Ezekiel 1820. May you find good fellowship and godly encouragement here, and may God bless you as you follow Him in love and obedience. There are many many different views about Christianity represented on the forums. In my short time here, I have found that most of us enjoy unity with each other because of our love for Christ even if we may disagree on specific doctrinal points.
 
Upvote 0

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,166
6,142
New Jersey
✟405,506.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Welcome to CF! :wave:

Believing in Jesus as the Messiah but rejecting the Atonement is an unusual combination, so you may have trouble finding a religious group whose beliefs match yours. Islam, perhaps? though Islam has some additional beliefs that may differ from yours.

In any case, I wish you well in your search, and I look forward to discussions with you here in CF.
 
Upvote 0

Adstar

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2005
2,184
1,381
New South Wales
✟49,258.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Hello

I am not looking to debate in this thread.

This is my first post, I would incredibly appreciate if someone could point me to a direction where similar views to my beliefs are shared. I can not call myself a 'Christian' because of certain doctrinal rejections and therefore I find it impossible to associate with any single movement within contemporary Christendom.

Brothers and Sisters, my beliefs may offend, but please show me the courtesy and respect that Jesus showed to everyone else.

I believe in:
Jesus is the Messiah
Jesus did not abolish or 'abrogate' the Laws, in fact he reinforced their importance.
I believe 'inspired' biblical text does not equate to inerrancy, in fact even the most conservative scholars accept early NT manuscripts are jam packed with errors/omissions/fabrications.
Jesus came to reform Judaism and give essence to the empty robotic rule following.
Jesus will have a second coming
Jewish law was never made void and Jesus never intended that people should start a new religion worshipping him as God. ("Why do you call me good...?")

I do not believe:
That Paul was an apostle, either he was deceived or was the deceiver. (Blasphemous to most Christians and therefore out of respect I do not call myself a Christian)
The rejection of Paul then ultimately leads to:
Rejection of Atonement
Rejection of Faith without work (as emphasised by James [ALWAYS forcefully misinterpreted by mainstream Christianity to reconcile with Paul, at least Martin Luther knew it was a contradiction])
Rejection of Christ's divinity
Rejection of any hypostatic union or any other technical theory relating to the nature/s of Jesus
Rejection of the Trinity (God is one [1] [o.n.e] in every way with no other numbers are associated with him)
Rejection of Original sin


Basically, I'm a Messianic Jew minus Pauline Christianity. Do I belong anywhere or will I forever be an individual without a congregation?

Well your not a Jew because judaism rejects Jesus as the Messiah and your not a Christian because you have declared Paul to be inspired by the deciever which i can only interprit as satan.. Unless you believe paul was decieved by another human being somewhere along the way..

So i can only see you as a Theist.. That pretty much just says that you believe in a god and you have accepted parts of different religions to make up your own personal religion..

I did notice you quoted some NT scriptures when you said ("Why do you call me good...?") I would like to respond to this if not for your benift ( that is up to your personal free will ) but for the benifit of my fellow Christians who may be reading along with interest.

Jesus never denied his divinity when he asked the young man why he called Him good.. The young man had taken on a bad habbit of calling religious teachers ""good"" when in fact only God is Good. Jesus of course knew the young man did not know Jesus was divine and so Jesus asked him to provoke self examination why do you call me good when only god is good.. Below i will add a comentary i wrote up some years ago about the portion of scriptures where this incident happened. I hope some people are blessed by it :)


Matthew 19
16 Now behold, one came and said to Him, “Good Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may have eternal life?”



Here we see a man whose foundation belief is achieving eternity with God by good Works. He is asking Jesus what he can do to make it into eternity with God. Of course this is imposable for any man, to justify his own place in eternity with God. So Jesus response to this man must be understood from this starting point of the conversation between the two. Now lets go to the next verse:



Matthew 19
17 So He said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one is good but One, that is, God. But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.”


Remember this man was a Jew who looked upon Jesus as being a teacher a rabbi, He did not know that Jesus was The Word of God, God made flesh. Jesus was Good. But Jesus knew this man did not know who He was so His reply was teaching the man Never to call another human being Good because no man was good. Only God is good. So then Jesus starts to convict the man of his inability to earn eternity bu his own righteousness, We continue:


Matthew 19
18 He said to Him, “Which ones?” Jesus said, “‘You shall not murder,’ ‘You shall not commit adultery,’ ‘You shall not steal,’ ‘You shall not bear false witness,’ 19 ‘Honor your father and your mother,’[h] and, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ ”


Matthew 19
20 The young man said to Him, “All these things I have kept from my youth.[j] What do I still lack?”


Now of course he is wrong in his reply, the man may have genuinely believed he was keeping all the commandments but as we know Jesus declared that even if you look at another woman with lust you are an adulterer and if you hate someone you are a murderer. So Jesus looking into the man knowing his weaknesses just picked something he would not be able to do. AND at the same time revealed that a man must be Perfect if he wants to have eternity with God. Something No man can achieve. The Scriptures continue:


Matthew 19
21 Jesus said to him, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.”22 But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions.


Can you imagine how crushed the young man was at that time? He went away knowing he could not justify himself before God because God requires Perfection which no man can achieve. That young man was now "set up" to receive the Love of the Truth of the Gospel. I imagine one day him hearing peter preaching and leaping for joy. I hope he did. But this in not where this episode ends the disciples at the time where also under the false impression that eternity with God was earned by good works and works of the law. They where dumbstruck by what Jesus said the chapter continues:


Matthew 19
23 Then Jesus said to His disciples, “Assuredly, I say to you that it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” 25 When His disciples heard it, they were greatly astonished, saying, “Who then can be saved?”


They did say Who then can be saved but they where still thinking that being saved was something that was still earned, paid for by man to God in the currency of good works and works of the Law. They knew that Jesus said to the man that he had to be perfect. Then Jesus gave them a definitive answer in the next verse:


Matthew 19
26 But Jesus looked at them and said to them, “With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”


Jesus both made it clear that it was Impossible for men to gain eternity by their own efforts. And confirmed that mankinds Salvation could only be achieved by Gods Works. God has done this by providing Atonement to cover mans imperfection through the death and resurrection of the Messiah Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

Randy777

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2017
1,174
313
Atlanta
✟107,179.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hello

I am not looking to debate in this thread.

This is my first post, I would incredibly appreciate if someone could point me to a direction where similar views to my beliefs are shared. I can not call myself a 'Christian' because of certain doctrinal rejections and therefore I find it impossible to associate with any single movement within contemporary Christendom.

Brothers and Sisters, my beliefs may offend, but please show me the courtesy and respect that Jesus showed to everyone else.

I believe in:
Jesus is the Messiah
Jesus did not abolish or 'abrogate' the Laws, in fact he reinforced their importance.
I believe 'inspired' biblical text does not equate to inerrancy, in fact even the most conservative scholars accept early NT manuscripts are jam packed with errors/omissions/fabrications.
Jesus came to reform Judaism and give essence to the empty robotic rule following.
Jesus will have a second coming
Jewish law was never made void and Jesus never intended that people should start a new religion worshipping him as God. ("Why do you call me good...?")

I do not believe:
That Paul was an apostle, either he was deceived or was the deceiver. (Blasphemous to most Christians and therefore out of respect I do not call myself a Christian)
The rejection of Paul then ultimately leads to:
Rejection of Atonement
Rejection of Faith without work (as emphasised by James [ALWAYS forcefully misinterpreted by mainstream Christianity to reconcile with Paul, at least Martin Luther knew it was a contradiction])
Rejection of Christ's divinity
Rejection of any hypostatic union or any other technical theory relating to the nature/s of Jesus
Rejection of the Trinity (God is one [1] [o.n.e] in every way with no other numbers are associated with him)
Rejection of Original sin


Basically, I'm a Messianic Jew minus Pauline Christianity. Do I belong anywhere or will I forever be an individual without a congregation?
How does God write the new covenant on the hearts of the people and God didn't find fault in the law He found fault in the people. The law had punishments per transgression and was without mercy.
Hence: You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish."John 11:50 NIV

What work did you do to have your sins forgiven? No, I don't think you can reject all that you have posted and feel comfortable in a body that proclaims faith in Jesus. Why would you reject Paul? I don't see a difference in what Paul taught versus what Jesus proclaimed. Sanctified by faith in Jesus. Besides I asked and received by faith and not based on what I do for the Fathers promise. Acts 2 What God gives He gives freely what you receive from man you might have to work hard for.

Credentials of a true Apostles of the Lord
2 cor 11:22-27 NIV
Are they Hebrews? So am I. Are they Israelites? So am I. Are they Abraham’s descendants? So am I. 23Are they servants of Christ? (I am out of my mind to talk like this.) I am more. I have worked much harder, been in prison more frequently, been flogged more severely, and been exposed to death again and again. 24Five times I received from the Jews the forty lashes minus one. 25Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was pelted with stones, three times I was shipwrecked, I spent a night and a day in the open sea, 26I have been constantly on the move. I have been in danger from rivers, in danger from bandits, in danger from my fellow Jews, in danger from Gentiles; in danger in the city, in danger in the country, in danger at sea; and in danger from false believers. 27I have labored and toiled and have often gone without sleep; I have known hunger and thirst and have often gone without food; I have been cold and naked.
 
Upvote 0

Ezekiel 1820

New Member
Oct 18, 2017
4
1
35
Sydney
✟23,720.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Thank you all for your replies. Definitely not Islam. I do believe the Law isn't abrogated by Jesus.

Well your not a Jew because judaism rejects Jesus as the Messiah and your not a Christian because you have declared Paul to be inspired by the deciever which i can only interprit as satan.. Unless you believe paul was decieved by another human being somewhere along the way..

I do not know, only God knows the truth. Whether Paul intentionally deceived or he himself was genuinely misled is beyond me. I do know that all the blasphemous doctrines that were concocted by Paul cannot be true as the Jewish Messiah was going to be the restorer of Israel and the Law, not the destroyer of the Law. Paul talks about doctrine, he is fascinated with the resurrection and vicarious atonement... not about what Jesus actually said and his message. Jesus prophesied his death but he never said you will all be redeemed with my blood!


So i can only see you as a Theist.. That pretty much just says that you believe in a god and you have accepted parts of different religions to make up your own personal religion..

I'm afraid you're right. I feel completely isolated but I do not believe it's my 'personal' religion. I simply reject Paul. Jesus is the only person who matters to me, he is the teacher and he does not have a medium. Also the Jewish law is sacred and everlasting. My religion is Jesus and the Law of God.

I did notice you quoted some NT scriptures when you said ("Why do you call me good...?") I would like to respond to this if not for your benift ( that is up to your personal free will ) but for the benifit of my fellow Christians who may be reading along with interest.

Jesus never denied his divinity when he asked the young man why he called Him good.. The young man had taken on a bad habbit of calling religious teachers ""good"" when in fact only God is Good. Jesus of course knew the young man did not know Jesus was divine and so Jesus asked him to provoke self examination why do you call me good when only god is good.. Below i will add a comentary i wrote up some years ago about the portion of scriptures where this incident happened. I hope some people are blessed by it :)

This is a standard Christian response, by no way do I mean that in a derogatory way but you are stretching out something that is plain and simple. Essentially what you're saying is "Jesus did not really mean what he said, he was talking from the other man's perspective." I completely disagree with your approach and it demonstrates bias confirmation. You believe in the divinity of Christ so you will go to any length to take a simple statement and turn it into the opposite meaning.

Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good—except God alone. (Luke 18:19)

Your beliefs are shaped by the doctrines of Paul. I will guarantee you, if you played devils advocate and truly relinquished Pauline Christianity you would read and understand that verse like any unbiased person will.

1) Jesus is rejecting the title 'Good'
2) Only God is Good
3) [Insert logical deduction]

"But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. (Matthew 24:36)
Ahh so a "fully God" Jesus has inabilities. How does your Pauline lenses alter your interpretation of this crystal clear verse?


Matthew 19
16 Now behold, one came and said to Him, “Good Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may have eternal life?”



Here we see a man whose foundation belief is achieving eternity with God by good Works. He is asking Jesus what he can do to make it into eternity with God. Of course this is imposable for any man, to justify his own place in eternity with God.

How do you know it's impossible? (Maybe impossible with man alone but not impossible for man with God's forgiveness) What part of God's forgiveness have you missed that Jesus preached about? What about God's grace in the Old Testament? "Impossible" is an extreme stance can you back that up without Paul's doctrines? Judaism the religion that Jesus followed never claimed such a thing.


So Jesus response to this man must be understood from this starting point of the conversation between the two. Now lets go to the next verse:



Matthew 19
17 So He said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one is good but One, that is, God. But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.”


Remember this man was a Jew who looked upon Jesus as being a teacher a rabbi, He did not know that Jesus was The Word of God, God made flesh.

That is because Jesus never claimed to be God made flesh nor would he. So you are telling me Jesus was praying to himself? Why do you take pure beautiful Monotheism, the great sole God of Israel and taint him with man concocted doctrines?

Jesus was Good.

"No one is Good but One, God."

But Jesus knew this man did not know who He was so His reply was teaching the man Never to call another human being Good because no man was good. Only God is good.

Ok, so Jesus is fully man and fully God. (even though that makes no sense 'fully'... but lets go with mainstream Christianity for the purpose of this discussion)
Is the fully man part of Jesus "not Good". So Jesus is Good and Not Good simultaneously? Does this make sense to you?


So then Jesus starts to convict the man of his inability to earn eternity bu his own righteousness, We continue:


Matthew 19
18 He said to Him, “Which ones?” Jesus said, “‘You shall not murder,’ ‘You shall not commit adultery,’ ‘You shall not steal,’ ‘You shall not bear false witness,’ 19 ‘Honor your father and your mother,’[h] and, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ ”


Matthew 19
20 The young man said to Him, “All these things I have kept from my youth.[j] What do I still lack?”


Now of course he is wrong in his reply, the man may have genuinely believed he was keeping all the commandments but as we know Jesus declared that even if you look at another woman with lust you are an adulterer and if you hate someone you are a murderer. So Jesus looking into the man knowing his weaknesses just picked something he would not be able to do. AND at the same time revealed that a man must be Perfect if he wants to have eternity with God. Something No man can achieve. The Scriptures continue:


Matthew 19
21 Jesus said to him, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.”22 But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions.


Can you imagine how crushed the young man was at that time? He went away knowing he could not justify himself before God because God requires Perfection which no man can achieve.

Ok. God does not "require" perfection. This is completely contrary to the OT. None of the OT prophets were "perfect" and yet they acquired God's grace and forgiveness. Again you are tainting this verse with your Paul lenses. Look at it as it is, without preconceived doctrines.


That young man was now "set up" to receive the Love of the Truth of the Gospel. I imagine one day him hearing peter preaching and leaping for joy. I hope he did. But this in not where this episode ends the disciples at the time where also under the false impression that eternity with God was earned by good works and works of the law. They where dumbstruck by what Jesus said the chapter continues:


Matthew 19
23 Then Jesus said to His disciples, “Assuredly, I say to you that it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” 25 When His disciples heard it, they were greatly astonished, saying, “Who then can be saved?”


They did say Who then can be saved but they where still thinking that being saved was something that was still earned, paid for by man to God in the currency of good works and works of the Law. They knew that Jesus said to the man that he had to be perfect. Then Jesus gave them a definitive answer in the next verse:


Matthew 19
26 But Jesus looked at them and said to them, “With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”


Jesus both made it clear that it was Impossible for men to gain eternity by their own efforts. And confirmed that mankinds Salvation could only be achieved by Gods Works.

"With men this is impossible"
I think that is quite self evident. If the grace of God was not needed then there would be no need for God to make a covenant with Israel in the first place! Jesus was a Jew. Read what he is saying from HIS perspective, the Jewish perspective.

"with God all things are possible."
Amen. Also note "possible". Mainstream Christianity believe vicarious redemption applies indiscriminately and with certainty, as long as one genuinely has faith in the Pauline doctrine of atonement.


God has done this by providing Atonement to cover mans imperfection through the death and resurrection of the Messiah Jesus.

You can believe Paul, or you can believe God:

"The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them."
-Ezekiel 18:20
 
Upvote 0

Adstar

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2005
2,184
1,381
New South Wales
✟49,258.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I can't find a denomination either, but Jesus Christ is our common denominator.

I do not belong to any denomination either.. But i believe the Bible is the Word of God.. So upon that Rock i seek to stand :)
 
Upvote 0

Ezekiel 1820

New Member
Oct 18, 2017
4
1
35
Sydney
✟23,720.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Marital Status
Single
I did not think my post would be of benifit to you Ezekiel 1820.. But i posted it anyway just in case.. But others will be blessed by it i am sure :)

God bless you brother, I do not reply with the hope of changing your mind but as a means to relieve my frustrations with something I hold so dear to me.

How do you reconcile the dual man and God nature of Jesus? If man is not Good and God is Good, then wouldn't that cancel each other out? Don't Pauline doctrines self evidently contradict themselves in one way or another?
 
Upvote 0

Adstar

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2005
2,184
1,381
New South Wales
✟49,258.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
God bless you brother, I do not reply with the hope of changing your mind but as a means to relieve my frustrations with something I hold so dear to me.

God has already blessed me greatly..Why do you call me Brother? You are not my brother in a religious sence or a family sence..

How do you reconcile the dual man and God nature of Jesus? If man is not Good and God is Good, then wouldn't that cancel each other out? Don't Pauline doctrines self evidently contradict themselves in one way or another?

Jesus was man in terms of his flesh body he existed in during his time on earth.. But the Spirit of Jesus was God.. So therefore i have no problem reconsiling Jesus as being God..

I have no problems with Paul..
 
Upvote 0

Ezekiel 1820

New Member
Oct 18, 2017
4
1
35
Sydney
✟23,720.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Jesus was man in terms of his flesh body he existed in during his time on earth.. But the Spirit of Jesus was God.. So therefore i have no problem reconsiling Jesus as being God..

I have no problems with Paul..

Please explain to me, maybe I am missing something that you see.
So when Jesus was called "Good teacher" Jesus should of said "My physical body is not Good, but my spirit is Good" ?
 
Upvote 0

Adstar

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2005
2,184
1,381
New South Wales
✟49,258.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Please explain to me, maybe I am missing something that you see.
So when Jesus was called "Good teacher" Jesus should of said "My physical body is not Good, but my spirit is Good" ?

No... Jesus simply asked the man ""Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God"" Now the young man could have replied.. I called you Good because you are God manifested in the flesh and you are without sin and therefore you are Good.. Then Jesus could have responded with something like
Blessed art thou, young man: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven... But since the younf man did not know jesus was LORD that did not happen.. As i said in my first post Jesus Never denied His deity by asking that question to the young man..
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RisenInJesus
Upvote 0

Randy777

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2017
1,174
313
Atlanta
✟107,179.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Thank you all for your replies. Definitely not Islam. I do believe the Law isn't abrogated by Jesus.



I do not know, only God knows the truth. Whether Paul intentionally deceived or he himself was genuinely misled is beyond me. I do know that all the blasphemous doctrines that were concocted by Paul cannot be true as the Jewish Messiah was going to be the restorer of Israel and the Law, not the destroyer of the Law. Paul talks about doctrine, he is fascinated with the resurrection and vicarious atonement... not about what Jesus actually said and his message. Jesus prophesied his death but he never said you will all be redeemed with my blood!




I'm afraid you're right. I feel completely isolated but I do not believe it's my 'personal' religion. I simply reject Paul. Jesus is the only person who matters to me, he is the teacher and he does not have a medium. Also the Jewish law is sacred and everlasting. My religion is Jesus and the Law of God.



This is a standard Christian response, by no way do I mean that in a derogatory way but you are stretching out something that is plain and simple. Essentially what you're saying is "Jesus did not really mean what he said, he was talking from the other man's perspective." I completely disagree with your approach and it demonstrates bias confirmation. You believe in the divinity of Christ so you will go to any length to take a simple statement and turn it into the opposite meaning.

Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good—except God alone. (Luke 18:19)

Your beliefs are shaped by the doctrines of Paul. I will guarantee you, if you played devils advocate and truly relinquished Pauline Christianity you would read and understand that verse like any unbiased person will.

1) Jesus is rejecting the title 'Good'
2) Only God is Good
3) [Insert logical deduction]

"But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. (Matthew 24:36)
Ahh so a "fully God" Jesus has inabilities. How does your Pauline lenses alter your interpretation of this crystal clear verse?




How do you know it's impossible? (Maybe impossible with man alone but not impossible for man with God's forgiveness) What part of God's forgiveness have you missed that Jesus preached about? What about God's grace in the Old Testament? "Impossible" is an extreme stance can you back that up without Paul's doctrines? Judaism the religion that Jesus followed never claimed such a thing.




That is because Jesus never claimed to be God made flesh nor would he. So you are telling me Jesus was praying to himself? Why do you take pure beautiful Monotheism, the great sole God of Israel and taint him with man concocted doctrines?



"No one is Good but One, God."



Ok, so Jesus is fully man and fully God. (even though that makes no sense 'fully'... but lets go with mainstream Christianity for the purpose of this discussion)
Is the fully man part of Jesus "not Good". So Jesus is Good and Not Good simultaneously? Does this make sense to you?




Ok. God does not "require" perfection. This is completely contrary to the OT. None of the OT prophets were "perfect" and yet they acquired God's grace and forgiveness. Again you are tainting this verse with your Paul lenses. Look at it as it is, without preconceived doctrines.




"With men this is impossible"
I think that is quite self evident. If the grace of God was not needed then there would be no need for God to make a covenant with Israel in the first place! Jesus was a Jew. Read what he is saying from HIS perspective, the Jewish perspective.

"with God all things are possible."
Amen. Also note "possible". Mainstream Christianity believe vicarious redemption applies indiscriminately and with certainty, as long as one genuinely has faith in the Pauline doctrine of atonement.




You can believe Paul, or you can believe God:

"The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them."
-Ezekiel 18:20
Jesus didn't teach salvation comes from following the law. He taught salvation comes from believing in Him. Since no one comes to the Father except by Him how then does that promote a righteousness to obtain salvation from the law? Rather one must go to the Son for life. And one goes to the Son for life based off faith in Him. Jesus came to seek and save the lost. How did the lost receive salvation apart from Jesus? Why were they lost? How were their sins forgiven? And on top of all that you have a whole world living in darkness and ignorance with many false Gods. The light of the gospel message was sent into all the world. Justice to the nations as with light comes accountability. The message is the same those who call on the lord will be saved. And such calling or asking is based off a sincere faith. Not the law. The work of God is to believe in the one He sent.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RisenInJesus
Upvote 0

All4Christ

✙ The Handmaid of God Laura ✙
CF Senior Ambassador
Site Supporter
Mar 11, 2003
11,796
8,174
PA
Visit site
✟1,182,796.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
AMBASSADOR HAT

34F9E1FA-D536-48D1-8F15-C655F7AD74FA.jpeg

Please remember that this is not a debate forum. It is for introductions only.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,715
19,729
Flyoverland
✟1,359,426.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Hello

I am not looking to debate in this thread.

This is my first post, I would incredibly appreciate if someone could point me to a direction where similar views to my beliefs are shared. I can not call myself a 'Christian' because of certain doctrinal rejections and therefore I find it impossible to associate with any single movement within contemporary Christendom.

Brothers and Sisters, my beliefs may offend, but please show me the courtesy and respect that Jesus showed to everyone else.

I believe in:
Jesus is the Messiah
Jesus did not abolish or 'abrogate' the Laws, in fact he reinforced their importance.
I believe 'inspired' biblical text does not equate to inerrancy, in fact even the most conservative scholars accept early NT manuscripts are jam packed with errors/omissions/fabrications.
Jesus came to reform Judaism and give essence to the empty robotic rule following.
Jesus will have a second coming
Jewish law was never made void and Jesus never intended that people should start a new religion worshipping him as God. ("Why do you call me good...?")

I do not believe:
That Paul was an apostle, either he was deceived or was the deceiver. (Blasphemous to most Christians and therefore out of respect I do not call myself a Christian)
The rejection of Paul then ultimately leads to:
Rejection of Atonement
Rejection of Faith without work (as emphasised by James [ALWAYS forcefully misinterpreted by mainstream Christianity to reconcile with Paul, at least Martin Luther knew it was a contradiction])
Rejection of Christ's divinity
Rejection of any hypostatic union or any other technical theory relating to the nature/s of Jesus
Rejection of the Trinity (God is one [1] [o.n.e] in every way with no other numbers are associated with him)
Rejection of Original sin


Basically, I'm a Messianic Jew minus Pauline Christianity. Do I belong anywhere or will I forever be an individual without a congregation?
Not debating you, but you do know that Paul can be read without using Luther's glasses? You might not share Luther's or Calvin's views about Paul. I don't. I read Paul a bit different from them. So do others. In fact there is a whole movement of 'New Perspectives on Paul'. Not that I would endorse all of that, but the main idea is to not use Luther's glasses, or even Augustine's glasses when reading Paul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mishkan
Upvote 0

Randy777

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2017
1,174
313
Atlanta
✟107,179.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Thank you all for your replies. Definitely not Islam. I do believe the Law isn't abrogated by Jesus.



I do not know, only God knows the truth. Whether Paul intentionally deceived or he himself was genuinely misled is beyond me. I do know that all the blasphemous doctrines that were concocted by Paul cannot be true as the Jewish Messiah was going to be the restorer of Israel and the Law, not the destroyer of the Law. Paul talks about doctrine, he is fascinated with the resurrection and vicarious atonement... not about what Jesus actually said and his message. Jesus prophesied his death but he never said you will all be redeemed with my blood!




I'm afraid you're right. I feel completely isolated but I do not believe it's my 'personal' religion. I simply reject Paul. Jesus is the only person who matters to me, he is the teacher and he does not have a medium. Also the Jewish law is sacred and everlasting. My religion is Jesus and the Law of God.



This is a standard Christian response, by no way do I mean that in a derogatory way but you are stretching out something that is plain and simple. Essentially what you're saying is "Jesus did not really mean what he said, he was talking from the other man's perspective." I completely disagree with your approach and it demonstrates bias confirmation. You believe in the divinity of Christ so you will go to any length to take a simple statement and turn it into the opposite meaning.

Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good—except God alone. (Luke 18:19)

Your beliefs are shaped by the doctrines of Paul. I will guarantee you, if you played devils advocate and truly relinquished Pauline Christianity you would read and understand that verse like any unbiased person will.

1) Jesus is rejecting the title 'Good'
2) Only God is Good
3) [Insert logical deduction]

"But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. (Matthew 24:36)
Ahh so a "fully God" Jesus has inabilities. How does your Pauline lenses alter your interpretation of this crystal clear verse?




How do you know it's impossible? (Maybe impossible with man alone but not impossible for man with God's forgiveness) What part of God's forgiveness have you missed that Jesus preached about? What about God's grace in the Old Testament? "Impossible" is an extreme stance can you back that up without Paul's doctrines? Judaism the religion that Jesus followed never claimed such a thing.




That is because Jesus never claimed to be God made flesh nor would he. So you are telling me Jesus was praying to himself? Why do you take pure beautiful Monotheism, the great sole God of Israel and taint him with man concocted doctrines?



"No one is Good but One, God."



Ok, so Jesus is fully man and fully God. (even though that makes no sense 'fully'... but lets go with mainstream Christianity for the purpose of this discussion)
Is the fully man part of Jesus "not Good". So Jesus is Good and Not Good simultaneously? Does this make sense to you?




Ok. God does not "require" perfection. This is completely contrary to the OT. None of the OT prophets were "perfect" and yet they acquired God's grace and forgiveness. Again you are tainting this verse with your Paul lenses. Look at it as it is, without preconceived doctrines.




"With men this is impossible"
I think that is quite self evident. If the grace of God was not needed then there would be no need for God to make a covenant with Israel in the first place! Jesus was a Jew. Read what he is saying from HIS perspective, the Jewish perspective.

"with God all things are possible."
Amen. Also note "possible". Mainstream Christianity believe vicarious redemption applies indiscriminately and with certainty, as long as one genuinely has faith in the Pauline doctrine of atonement.




You can believe Paul, or you can believe God:

"The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them."
-Ezekiel 18:20
You might consider your mistaken on atonement
I follow Jesus=>This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
Jesus=>Jesus said to her, "I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die;
John=>No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in them; they cannot go on sinning, because they have been born of God.
Rev 5:9 And they sang a new song, saying: "You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased for God persons from every tribe and language and people and nation.
The apostles weren't ashamed to be called Christians and I am not ashamed of the name either.
Randy
 
Upvote 0