• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

I am arminian

Status
Not open for further replies.

II Paradox II

Oracle of the Obvious
Oct 22, 2003
527
32
51
California
Visit site
✟860.00
Faith
Calvinist
Sunbeam said:
What is Thomism and Augustinianism in nutshells? Are they from Catholicism?
Basically they can be thought of as forerunners and alternatives to Calvinism (and yes, both augustine and aquinas were catholic). They are similar in that they all teach that God elects people without consideration of their merit or choices. They are similar in that they all teach that God decrees the salvation of some while at least passing over everyone else. They differ in their theories of free-will, the extent of the atonement and how grace is received.

They are also both relatively rare in popular Catholic circles even though they are well represented among Catholic theologians. I should add as well that most calvinistic and lutheran thought is derived from augustine. Even though Aquinas teaches a similar idea, he was largely (and I think unjustifiably) ignored and dismissed by both Calvin and Luther.

ken
 
Upvote 0

Lotar

Swift Eagle Justice
Feb 27, 2003
8,163
445
45
Southern California
✟34,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Sunbeam said:
I personally like the Lutheran understanding, which is inbetween Calvinism and Arminian, even though I go to a Calvary Chapel.

__________________

Really? What is the Lutheran understanding? I don't know.
http://www.lcms.org/belief/doct-07.html

Of Conversion

10. We teach that conversion consists in this, that a man, having learned from the Law of God that he is a lost and condemned sinner, is brought to faith in the Gospel, which offers him forgiveness of sins and eternal salvation for the sake of Christ's vicarious satisfaction, Acts 11:21; Luke 24:46, 47; Acts 26:18.

11. All men, since the Fall, are dead in sins, Eph. 2:1-3, and inclined only to evil, Gen. 6:5; 8:21; Rom. 8:7. For this reason, and particularly because men regard the Gospel of Christ, crucified for the sins of the world, as foolishness, 1 Cor. 2:14, faith in the Gospel, or conversion to God, is neither wholly nor in the least part the work of man, but the work of God's grace and almighty power alone, Phil. 1:29; Eph. 2:8; 1:19; -- Jer. 31:18. Hence Scripture call the faith of men, or his conversion, a raising from the dead, Eph. 1:20; Col. 2:12, a being born of God, John 1:12, 13, a new birth by the Gospel, 1 Pet, 1:23-25, a work of God like the creation of light at the creation of the world, 2 Cor. 4:6.

12. On the basis of these clear statements of the Holy Scriptures we reject every kind of synergism, that is, the doctrine that conversion is wrought not by the grace and power of God alone, but in part also by the co-operation of man himself, by man's right conduct, his right attitude, his right self-determination, his lesser guilt or less evil conduct as compared with others, his refraining from willful resistance, or anything else whereby man's conversion and salvation is taken out of the gracious hands of God and made to depend on what man does or leaves undone. For this refraining from willful resistance or from any kind of resistance is also solely a work of grace, which "changes unwilling into willing men," Ezek. 36:26; Phil. 2:13. We reject also the doctrine that man is able to decide for conversion through "powers imparted by grace," since this doctrine presupposes that before conversion man still possesses spiritual powers by which he can make the right use of such "powers imparted by grace."

13. On the other hand, we reject also the Calvinistic perversion of the doctrine of conversion, that is, the doctrine that God does not desire to convert and save all hearers of the Word, but only a portion of them. Many hearers of the Word indeed remain unconverted and are not saved, not because God does not earnestly desire their conversion and salvation, but solely because they stubbornly resist the gracious operation of the Holy Ghost, as Scripture teaches, Acts 7:51; Matt. 23:37; Acts 13:46.

14. As to the question why not all men are converted and saved, seeing that God's grace is universal and all men are equally and utterly corrupt, we confess that we cannot answer it. From Scripture we know only this: A man owes his conversion and salvation, not to any lesser guilt or better conduct on his part, but solely to the grace of God. But any man's non-conversion is due to himself alone; it is the result of his obstinate resistance against the converting operation of the Holy Ghost. Hos. 13:9.

15. Our refusal to go beyond what is revealed in these two Scriptural truths is not "masked Calvinism" ("Crypto- Calvinism") but precisely the Scriptural teaching of the Lutheran Church as it is presented in detail in the Formula of Concord (Triglot, p. 1081, paragraphs 57-59, 60b, 62, 63; M. p. 716f.): "That one is hardened, blinded, given over to a reprobate mind, while another, who is indeed in the same guilt, is converted again, etc. -- in these and similar questions Paul fixes a certain limit to us how far we should go, namely, that in the one part we should recognize God's judgment. For they are well-deserved penalties of sins when God so punished a land or nation for despising His Word that the punishment extends also to their posterity, as is to be seen in the Jews. And thereby God in some lands and persons exhibits His severity to those that are His in order to indicate what we all would have well deserved and would be worthy and worth, since we act wickedly in opposition to God's Word and often grieve the Holy Ghost sorely; in order that we may live in the fear of God and acknowledge and praise God's goodness, to the exclusion of, and contrary to, our merit in and with us, to whom He gives His Word and with whom He leaves it and whom He does not harden and reject...And this His righteous, well-deserved judgment He displays in some countries, nations and persons in order that, when we are placed alongside of them and compared with them (quam simillimi illis deprehensi, i.e., and found to be most similar to them), we may learn the more diligently to recognize and praise God's pure, unmerited grace in the vessels of mercy...When we proceed thus far in this article, we remain on the right way, as it is written, Hos. 13:9: `O Israel, thou hast destroyed thyself; but in Me is thy help.' However, as regards these things in this disputation which would soar too high and beyond these limits, we should with Paul place the finger upon our lips and remember and say, Rom. 9:20: `O man, who art thou that repliest against God?'" The Formula of Concord describes the mystery which confronts us here not as a mystery in man's heart (a "psychological" mystery), but teaches that, when we try to understand why "one is hardened, blinded, given over to a reprobate mind, while another, who is indeed in the same guilt, is converted again," we enter the domain of the unsearchable judgments of God and ways past finding out, which are not revealed to us in His Word, but which we shall know in eternal life. 1 Cor. 13:12.

16. Calvinists solve this mystery, which God has not revealed in His Word, by denying the universality of grace; synergists, by denying that salvation is by grace alone. Both solutions are utterly vicious, since they contradict Scripture and since every poor sinner stands in need of, and must cling to, both the unrestricted universal grace and the unrestricted "by grace alone," lest he despair and perish.
 
Upvote 0

Serapha

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2003
5,133
28
✟6,704.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Sunbeam said:
I would like to hear positive experiences only about those who attend arminian based churches. How long you have been going? What had been some of the most touching sermons, or learning experiences, or people that you met in them, how you first started going - did you go with someone?


Hi there!

:wave:

I grew up in an arminian-based denomination. I switched to baptist teachings years ago because I am convinced that the doctrine of eternal security is entirely biblical. However, most of my family and many friends are arminian-believers.


What is one of the most touching sermons?


Any of the early denominational teachings on "holiness".

Buddy Robinson:
"If the Lord is your Shepherd, then you are the Lord’s sheep, and He has a perfect right to shear you any time He needs wool and you have no right to bleat.”



~malaka~



 
Upvote 0

Ken

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2003
1,137
47
62
North Central Indiana
Visit site
✟1,582.00
Faith
Calvinist
Lanakila... I attended an EV Free church and it was very Calvinistic in nature, the pastor had attended a 4 point Calvinistic Univ., and they featured the books and tapes of Calvinists in their library, ie esp. John Gerstner and RC Sproul.... for instance, one EV Free church writes about itself thusly:

"We are constitutionally Congregational, Doctrinally Calvinistic, practising Believer's Baptism."
http://www.findachurch.co.uk/churches/sj/sj84/bethelhanley/

another says
"The preaching and teaching is expository, emphasizes application, and is unashamedly Calvinistic."
http://www.reachingforchrist.org/churchfinders/usachurches/co_churches/lhefc.html

However I did also find those who say that officially, the EV Free church tries to remain uncommitted to the Calvinist/Arminian debate, and that a given EV Free church may be more Arminian or Calvinistic, depending on the individual pastor.....

blessings
 
Upvote 0

Ken

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2003
1,137
47
62
North Central Indiana
Visit site
✟1,582.00
Faith
Calvinist
[font=&quot]Sunbeam…. re Armenian versus Arminian.... the former is usually used in identifying those who are from the country of Armenia, the latter is the theological view descended from the teachings of [/font][font=&quot]Jacobus Arminius[/font][font=&quot]..... though there is an Armenian Church.... at http://www.armenianchurch.org/ .... they consider themselves to be more in line doctrinally and historically with the Eastern Orthodox, rather than western churches...

What is the Eastern Church?
The Eastern or Oriental Church is the original Church, which Christ founded in Jerusalem. The principal representatives of the Eastern Church are the Armenian, Greek, Syrian, Egyptian and other Churches which though they differ from each other by nationality, language and rites and have an ecclesiastical government absolutely independent of each other, yet have the same Divine Head who is Christ."
http://www.armenianchurch.org/church/believe/index.html[/font]
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.