Polycarp_fan
Well-Known Member
the ironic thing is, PC_F is so clueless about humanism that he doesn't know that you can be a CHRISTIAN humanist
its sad that we get some document about an atheistic version, but christians would easily agree with it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_humanism
funny that christians from the second century were humanists, yet we have some guy here spewing hate on them for being humanists.
Christian and anti-divinity together in the same mind.
Yeah, Ok, sure. I guess in today's world well, anything does go.
Well of course not God. Not in Humanism anyway:
TENTH: It follows that there will be no uniquely religious emotions and attitudes of the kind hitherto associated with belief in the supernatural.
And just look at how the public square has been dictated since the rise of humanism. And without doubt, the education system IS the Church of Humanism.
Or as Humanism put it:
"ELEVENTH: Man will learn to face the crises of life in terms of his knowledge of their naturalness and probability.
Reasonable and manly attitudes will be fostered by education and supported by custom. We assume that humanism will take the path of social and mental hygiene and discourage sentimental and unreal hopes and wishful thinking."
Welcome Authoritaritarianism and Totlatitarianism. Not hidden in any way.
It is far past time for Christians, Jews, Muslims and Hindu's and all other deeply religious people to see what is facing our freedoms being forcefully curtailed. And once again, the Congregation of the Education System is the House of Humanism.
And is regards to POLITICS, it is clear that Humanism is also the platform of "Progressive Ideology" as a synonym for Humansim:
"FOURTEENTH: The humanists are firmly convinced that existing acquisitive and profit-motivated society has shown itself to be inadequate and that a radical change in methods, controls, and motives must be instituted.
A socialized and cooperative economic order must be established to the end that the equitable distribution of the means of life be possible. The goal of humanism is a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently cooperate for the common good.
Humanists demand a shared life in a shared world."
Enter "Change We Can Believe In." Socialism blurred to Communism. Where's the difference.
"We," meaning those that proscribe Humanism in the Humanist Manifesto.
Where do Humanists get the AUDACITY that THEY and ONLY THEY get to decide how the world is to be RUN?
In the thread: Hating Christians What's the Root Cause . . .
I made the case that it is Humanism that is the root of the hatred of Christians and Christianity and I used the Humanist Manifesto accurately to do so.
Who gets to BE the Humanist Rulers over all. "Uber alles" as the Germans say?
"FIFTEENTH AND LAST: We assert that humanism will: (a) affirm life rather than deny it; (b) seek to elicit the possibilities of life, not flee from them; and (c) endeavor to establish the conditions of a satisfactory life for all, not merely for the few. By this positive morale and intention humanism will be guided, and from this perspective and alignment the techniques and efforts of humanism will flow."
Enter the Congregation of the School system.
And now here hedonism proclaimed as accurately as it ever has:
"So stand the theses of religious humanism. Though we consider the religious forms and ideas of our fathers no longer adequate,
the quest for the good life is still the central task for mankind.
Man is at last becoming aware that he alone is responsible for the realization of the world of his dreams, that he has within himself the power for its achievement. He must set intelligence and will to the task."
The greatest atrocities the world has even seen has come from a human mind homogenizing other minds to implement its will on all, in "hope" that all people can be subjugated into a collective unit.
Welcome the mark of the beast when?
Upvote
0
----- I've heard that Korean Churhces have more Christian missionaries out in the world than any other country.