Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!

[sjastro]

@David Hine7 . I can't help thinking that your constant repetition of Ho, Ho, Ho, is no more than a timely reminder that Christmas approaches.

Ha, Ha , Ha. (Hubble constant as a function of the scale factor 'a').

 

[Hans Blaster]

The elegant equations come from Maxwell's description of how the dynamic Aether dictates the speed of light vibrations.

How?

Newton, Faraday Maxwell and Einstein never forgot "God did it"!!

Not relevant.

That's the basis of the two Hubble Constant equations. Learn them and enjoy:-

Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc


Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........

That was not a derivation.

Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

There is no such thing as a "local speed of light". Do you not understand Einstein?

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.

As stated several times before. Claiming it is not an error does not fix your dimensional problems.

The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.

Why pi^21?

The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C..

=============================================================================================
Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.


Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring light years as years only.



===========================================================================================

Repeating your non-derivation does not make it a derivation.

The "Hubble Tension Issue"

Note:- In the "Dynamic Aether Framework" of the Ho calculating equation in which Ho is "fixed" numerically to C,
the "Hubble Tension issue" is caused by the "DISTANT LOCAL VALUE" of C in the observed space regions being
directly affected by the presence of huge galaxies, black holes. or void areas, RELATIVE to the observer.

Download all attachments as a zip file

• 
  
  Hubble Constant (Ho) Using Online Calculator (Screenshot) (2) - Copy.png
  242 kB
• 
  
  Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance Light Years Using Online Calculator (Screenshot) - Copy.png
  245.4 kB

None of your links work and they never have.

 

[David Hine7]

What will you say when you see every future measurement of Ho centres around 71?. How will you cope with having to relearn everthing you think you know about cosmology? It will be good when you realise God rules the cosmos with maths frameworks. God did it !!!

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

What will you say when you see every future measurement of Ho centres around 71?. How will you cope with having to relearn everthing you think you know about cosmology? It will be good when you realise God rules the cosmos with maths frameworks. God did it !!!

Not once have you shown how your formula proves that God did anything as you claim.

 

[Hans Blaster]

What will you say when you see every future measurement of Ho centres around 71?.

That the current measurements are of high quality. This is no different than saying "what will it mean if measured values of c are all centered around 300,000 km/s?" -- that we know how to measure the speed of light and when it was drastically different 200 years ago, we didn't.

How will you cope with having to relearn everthing you think you know about cosmology?

Hey, when I learned cosmology in the class room H_o was around 60-80 km/s/Mpc and the age of the universe was 15 +/- 3 Gyr. Then more precise measurements were made leading to the current value. (You write this as if I don't know anyone involved in making cosmology precise.)

It will be good when you realise God rules the cosmos with maths frameworks. God did it !!!

If only you put as much effort in to demonstrating that math that you put into typing your assertive declarations.

 

[David Hine7]

Good equations don't need explaining. The most important thing is the elegant way they demonstrate the relationships to other constants and give correct numerical answers as proof. We now can see how Ho and C are directly linked. That is because the Aether controls both the speed of light and universe expansion.. God did it !!

 

[Hans Blaster]

Good equations don't need explainining.

They sure do. That's how we know they are "good equations".

The most important thing is the elegant way they demonstrate the relationships to other constants and give correct numerical answers as proof.

Elegance is irrelevant to correctness. And numbers without units are not physics. Numbers with the wrong units are *WRONG*.

We now can see how Ho and C are directly linked. That is because the Aether controls both the speed of light and universe expansion.. God did it !!

There is no aether. Ho and c (lower case please!) are not linked directly.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Good equations don't need explainining. The most important thing is the elegant way they demonstrate the relationships to other constants and give correct numerical answers as proof. We now can see how Ho and C are directly linked. That is because the Aether controls both the speed of light and universe expansion.. God did it !!

Good equations 100% do need explaining. What also needs explaining is connecting how of that fits in with the claim that "God did it !!"

 

[sjastro]

What will you say when you see every future measurement of Ho centres around 71?. How will you cope with having to relearn everthing you think you know about cosmology? It will be good when you realise God rules the cosmos with maths frameworks. God did it !!!

What I can say is that you are trolling.

When I corrected your nonsensical interpretation of the Hubble tension, the value of Ho based on the CMB is as low as 67 which is nowhere near 71 given the precision of modern day instruments.

 

[David Hine7]

God equations 100% do need explaining. What also needs explaining is connecting how of that fits in with the claim that "God did it !!"

God Created the universe and the maths laws that control it. Nothing can contest that. You will see 67 is a little on the low side, due to slight vaiations of C in the distant region relative to the observer. Others state it's 73, a little on the highside, same cause.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

God Created the universe and the maths laws that control it. Nothing can contest that.

Which is a religious claim and not one that can be backed up at all with science.

 

[David Hine7]

Science is also the study of God's Creation, so science also a set of beliefs that can be proven wrong, The big bang is just a belief, is it not??

 

[sjastro]

Good equations don't need explaining. The most important thing is the elegant way they demonstrate the relationships to other constants and give correct numerical answers as proof. We now can see how Ho and C are directly linked. That is because the Aether controls both the speed of light and universe expansion.. God did it !!

Do you have a direct line to God?
Did God tell you he used Aether to control both the speed of light and expansion?

 

[David Hine7]

Do you have a direct line to God?
Did God tell you he used Aether to control both the speed of light and expansion?

Genesis answers your two questions. "The deep" is the Aether, that provides the framewoork of the universe.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Science is also the study of God's Creation, so science also a set of beliefs that can be proven wrong, The big bang is just a belief, is it not??

Science is the study of God's creation, yes, but science is not at all a set of beliefs. Science is merely the study of the natural world around us. The Big Bang Theory is not a belief but a scientific theory.

If you can't even get those basics right, I question if you really are as smart as you think you are with this equation of yours.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Genesis answers your two questions. "The deep" is the Aether, that provides the framewoork of the universe.

Nope, that's a post-hoc reading of the Bible. In Simple English; it's you adding to the Bible.

 

[David Hine7]

Nope, that's a post-hoc reading of the Bible. In Simple English; it's you adding to the Bible.

So what is "The deep"? It's the Aether. God did it !!

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

So what is "The deep"? It's the Aether. God did it !!

Nope, it's you adding to the Bible, especially a very poetic part of the Bible.

 

[David Hine7]

I suppose you would rightly call my Ho equations poetic. Yes, elegant and poetic !!

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I suppose you would rightly call my Ho equations poetic. Yes, elegant and poetic !!

Your delusions of grandeur are worrying.