• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!

David Hine7

New Member
Oct 24, 2025
4
0
77
Southend-on-Sea
✟328.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!!

This short work supports the universe was Created by God. The Hubble Constant, Ho, (universe expansion) is central to Creation.
The equations here are HATED by secular science, BECAUSE they support that God Created the universe and the maths framework that controls it:-


My name is David Hine, and here is an interesting Hubble Constant equation that "fixes" Ho to local light speed, C.

Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........


Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.

The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C..


With very kind regards, David Hine.

Email:- dhine2999@yahoo.com

=============================================================================================
Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.



Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring
light years as years only.



===========================================================================================

The "Hubble Tension Issue"

Note:- In the "Dynamic Aether Framework" of the Ho calculating equation in which Ho is "fixed" numerically to C,
the "Hubble Tension issue" is caused by the "DISTANT LOCAL VALUE" of C in the observed space regions being
directly affected by the presence of huge galaxies, black holes. or void areas, RELATIVE to the observer.


Download all attachments as a zip file
 

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
22,808
17,040
55
USA
✟431,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!!

This short work supports the universe was Created by God. The Hubble Constant, Ho, (universe expansion) is central to Creation.
The equations here are HATED by secular science, BECAUSE they support that God Created the universe and the maths framework that controls it:-


My name is David Hine, and here is an interesting Hubble Constant equation that "fixes" Ho to local light speed, C.
There is no "local" speed of light. There is only one and it is the same everywhere.
Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc
It does not. The expression you gave above will have units f Mpc * km / s, not km/s/Mpc. You are off by Mpc^2.

In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........


Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.
No. It most certainly is an error.


The Hubble constant (H_o) scales the recession velocity due to expansion to distance. It is measured in (speed) per (distance) or (km/s)/Mpc. A galaxy 1 Mpc away will have a recession velocity of H_o * d = 72 km/s.
The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C..


With very kind regards, David Hine.


=============================================================================================

Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years
It certainly does not. The unites are wrong multiplying (Mpc) * (km/s) and dividing by ( (km/s)/Mpc ) gives an area in Mpc squared.
In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.



Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring
light years as years only.
light years are distances. No one should be confused by that.
===========================================================================================

The "Hubble Tension Issue"

Note:- In the "Dynamic Aether Framework" of the Ho calculating equation in which Ho is "fixed" numerically to C,
the "Hubble Tension issue" is caused by the "DISTANT LOCAL VALUE" of C in the observed space regions being
directly affected by the presence of huge galaxies, black holes. or void areas, RELATIVE to the observer.


Download all attachments as a zip file
 
Upvote 0

David Hine7

New Member
Oct 24, 2025
4
0
77
Southend-on-Sea
✟328.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi. You must look at the attachments to see how these maths are done. Do not use the "SI" maths system, otherwise you will create confusion errors with the units This is a common trap. Follow the method exactly used as shown in the 2 attatchments. Then study why the maths has to be done that way. It's the old system, and is compatible with the way God does maths. The age of the universe is unknown. Blessings, David Hine
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,402
9,393
52
✟398,525.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!!

This short work supports the universe was Created by God. The Hubble Constant, Ho, (universe expansion) is central to Creation.
The equations here are HATED by secular science, BECAUSE they support that God Created the universe and the maths framework that controls it:-


My name is David Hine, and here is an interesting Hubble Constant equation that "fixes" Ho to local light speed, C.

Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........


Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.

The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C..


With very kind regards, David Hine.

Email:- dhine2999@yahoo.com

=============================================================================================

Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.



Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring
light years as years only.



===========================================================================================

The "Hubble Tension Issue"

Note:- In the "Dynamic Aether Framework" of the Ho calculating equation in which Ho is "fixed" numerically to C,
the "Hubble Tension issue" is caused by the "DISTANT LOCAL VALUE" of C in the observed space regions being
directly affected by the presence of huge galaxies, black holes. or void areas, RELATIVE to the observer.


Download all attachments as a zip file
My shoe fits my foot! Godidit!
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
22,808
17,040
55
USA
✟431,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Hi. You must look at the attachments to see how these maths are done. Do not use the "SI" maths system, otherwise you will create confusion errors with the units This is a common trap. Follow the method exactly used as shown in the 2 attatchments. Then study why the maths has to be done that way. It's the old system, and is compatible with the way God does maths. The age of the universe is unknown. Blessings, David Hine
SI is a system of UNITS. It is not a system of math. Of the 4 units mentioned in your post, only two (km and second) are SI units. The others (Mpc and ly) are not.

The units of your calculation do not match. The Hubble constant is a physical quantity with units. If your "derivation" [yeilding length*length] does not result in units of the correct dimensionality [1/time] -- IT IS WRONG. What ever numbers you dragooned in to the calculation are irrelevant. (pi^21, lol)
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,389
10,246
✟293,832.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!!

This short work supports the universe was Created by God. The Hubble Constant, Ho, (universe expansion) is central to Creation.
The equations here are HATED by secular science, BECAUSE they support that God Created the universe and the maths framework that controls it:-


My name is David Hine, and here is an interesting Hubble Constant equation that "fixes" Ho to local light speed, C.

Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........


Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.

The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C..


With very kind regards, David Hine.

Email:- dhine2999@yahoo.com

=============================================================================================

Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.



Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring
light years as years only.



===========================================================================================

The "Hubble Tension Issue"

Note:- In the "Dynamic Aether Framework" of the Ho calculating equation in which Ho is "fixed" numerically to C,
the "Hubble Tension issue" is caused by the "DISTANT LOCAL VALUE" of C in the observed space regions being
directly affected by the presence of huge galaxies, black holes. or void areas, RELATIVE to the observer.


Download all attachments as a zip file
David, it is a nice evening in Southend-on-Sea. Wrap up warm, be prepared for rain, but take a brisk walk down to the pier. The fresh air may be sufficient to alert you to the nonsense you have posted. If that doesn't work, give some serious attention to @Hans Blaster's comments. I wish you good luck.
 
Upvote 0

David Hine7

New Member
Oct 24, 2025
4
0
77
Southend-on-Sea
✟328.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I post good stuff. Let's look at the horizon distance equation.

Just do this equation exactly as follows, inputting whatever is your prefered value for Ho.

What could be easier, and it's the best way to calculate the horizon distance.

If you wish, you could do this Imperial by inputting Ho as 44 miles / second and C as 186000 miles / second.

You will get the same Hubble horizon distance of 13.8 BLY's

No one knows the age of the universe, other than Creator God :-


Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.





oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.



Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring
light years as years only.



===========================================================================================
 
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
5,966
4,845
✟359,357.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!!

This short work supports the universe was Created by God. The Hubble Constant, Ho, (universe expansion) is central to Creation.
The equations here are HATED by secular science, BECAUSE they support that God Created the universe and the maths framework that controls it:-


My name is David Hine, and here is an interesting Hubble Constant equation that "fixes" Ho to local light speed, C.

Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........


Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.

The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C..


With very kind regards, David Hine.

Email:- dhine2999@yahoo.com

=============================================================================================

Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.



Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring
light years as years only.



===========================================================================================

The "Hubble Tension Issue"

Note:- In the "Dynamic Aether Framework" of the Ho calculating equation in which Ho is "fixed" numerically to C,
the "Hubble Tension issue" is caused by the "DISTANT LOCAL VALUE" of C in the observed space regions being
directly affected by the presence of huge galaxies, black holes. or void areas, RELATIVE to the observer.


Download all attachments as a zip file
If you didn't mess around with the units of Hₒ we would have a pretty good idea of the age of the universe.

UntitledA.png


Hₒ is a misnomer it is a constant as measured today, H(a) as a function of the scale factor 'a' deceases with time as the universe is metrically expanding.
1/Hₒ ≈ (3.086 x 10¹⁹)/70 = 4.4 x 10¹⁷s ≈ 14 billion years.

This is an approximate value as it assumes the universe is expanding uniformly.

To get a more accurate value we need to start off with Einstein's field equations.

Untitled1.png


A cosmological solution to the field equations is the FLRW metric.

Untitled2.png


When the metric is plugged into the field equations the Friedmann equations are obtained.

Untitled3.png


From these equations we find:

UntitledB.png


This explains why the Hubble value decreases with time as the scale factor 'a' increases with time, hence:

blah.png


The equation for t(a) allows the age of the universe to be calculated by summing piecewise the various stages when the universe underwent different expansion rates.

From this the age of the universe is around 13.8 billion years.
 
Upvote 0

David Hine7

New Member
Oct 24, 2025
4
0
77
Southend-on-Sea
✟328.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Your maths are wrong because it's based on pure guesswork, wishful thinking and hearsay. Were you there when God Created the universe?? it's not even your poor false guesswork, as it looks like you copied that tosh from Wikipedia. There is no way anyone knows the age of the universe. It also looks ever more likely that Ho at 71 is tied numerically to C, otherwise the universe (controlled by God's laws) would never have distributed the stars evenly to appear similar which ever which way you point your telescope. Isaiah Ch 40 tells us "God stretches the skies", so Edwin Hubble was NOT the first to know of expansion. Why are you so terrified that God Created the universe and the maths laws that control it?? .
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
22,808
17,040
55
USA
✟431,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Your maths are wrong because it's based on pure guesswork, wishful thinking and hearsay.
Mine is based on dimensional analysis. This demonstrates that you don't even have consistent units in you calculation. Physical quantities "derived" in a manner with inconsistent units are not possibly true.

@sjastro based his on solutions to the Einstein field equations for an expanding space-time using the FLRW metric.

Neither is guess work or "wishful thinking" as both are based on sound physical principles. I wonder if you even know what "hearsay" is given the way you used it.
Were you there when God Created the universe??
as much as you were
it's not even your poor false guesswork, as it looks like you copied that tosh from Wikipedia.
You must be commenting to @sjastro, since I don't think you would mistake my dimensional analysis as something from a Wikipedia article. (It is clearly typeset and probably from a write-up of basic cosmology.)
There is no way anyone knows the age of the universe.
Sure there is. I do. You can too. I know it better than when I studied cosmology at university.
It also looks ever more likely that Ho at 71 is tied numerically to C, otherwise the universe (controlled by God's laws) would never have distributed the stars evenly to appear similar which ever which way you point your telescope.
The stars and the galaxies are not distributed evenly. They are clumpy.
Isaiah Ch 40 tells us "God stretches the skies", so Edwin Hubble was NOT the first to know of expansion.
It uses a tent metaphor for the stars on the dome of the firmament above the disk of the Earth. It's straight up flat earth + dome ancient cosmology. It has no concept of the sky expanding or stars that are vast distances away.
Why are you so terrified that God Created the universe and the maths laws that control it?? .
No one is terrified of this. You have done nothing to even demonstrate that this claim is true.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: sjastro
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
5,966
4,845
✟359,357.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Your maths are wrong because it's based on pure guesswork, wishful thinking and hearsay. Were you there when God Created the universe?? it's not even your poor false guesswork, as it looks like you copied that tosh from Wikipedia. There is no way anyone knows the age of the universe. It also looks ever more likely that Ho at 71 is tied numerically to C, otherwise the universe (controlled by God's laws) would never have distributed the stars evenly to appear similar which ever which way you point your telescope. Isaiah Ch 40 tells us "God stretches the skies", so Edwin Hubble was NOT the first to know of expansion. Why are you so terrified that God Created the universe and the maths laws that control it?? .
Stop making ignorant comments when the mathematics is clearly beyond your capacity of comprehension given you do not even have a basic understanding of how physical units apply.
The mathematics quoted is taught at honours level applied mathematics and @Hans Blaster can fill you in at what level in physics.

The nonsensical argument of not being there is revealed in all its glory when applied to history.
Do you reject all history because you were not there?
 
Upvote 0