Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It was a long winded way of saying that even if you were in a NWO you still wouldn't even know it.
I seriously doubt Fox is antisemitic.I never watch FNC, but I have seen enough clips to know that she knows exactly what her word choices are signally.
I wasn't talking about FNC, I was talking about Laura Ingraham. She knows exactly what she is signaling. She ain't dumb.I seriously doubt Fox is antisemitic.
If you watched Laura Ingram you would know she spent the last few months covering the anti Semitic protests and how the Jewish students were treated and how the heads of the universities testified that it depended on the context whether or not calling for the genocide of Jews violated the rules.
I have too much respect for myself to do that to me.If you watched Laura Ingram
There are many reasons a commentator might focus on those anti-Israel protests that are not exclusive:you would know she spent the last few months covering the anti Semitic protests and how the Jewish students were treated and how the heads of the universities testified that it depended on the context whether or not calling for the genocide of Jews violated the rules.
The term "globalist" filtered up from the antisemitic far right. They use it as a code word for "Jews control the world" to conceal their meaning to get mainstream conservatives using their terms. Each layer outward, terms like "globalist" get more obscured and used unknowingly by more and more who have no idea what the original intent was. Ms. INgraham is media savvy to know about that code, so if she uses it, shame on her.She is not using dog whistles to covertly criticize Jews, globalists means globalists.
This is the equivalent of 1984's newspeak. Any criticism of George Soros is anti-semitism.I have too much respect for myself to do that to me.
There are many reasons a commentator might focus on those anti-Israel protests that are not exclusive:
1. Genuine distaste for antisemitism
2. Strong pro-Israel position (which to support they allow the conflation of anti-Israel and anti-zionist with antisemitic.
3. Anti-Arab, anti-Palestinian, or anti-Islamic positions
4. Distaste for college students and leftists (most such protests involve left-leaning university students)
These lengthy media campaigns by Fox and others to focus on these protest are in part to tie the extemists and outliers to the mainstream left/Democrats. That's what really explains the duration of Ms. Ingraham's attention to the topic.
The term "globalist" filtered up from the antisemitic far right. They use it as a code word for "Jews control the world" to conceal their meaning to get mainstream conservatives using their terms. Each layer outward, terms like "globalist" get more obscured and used unknowingly by more and more who have no idea what the original intent was. Ms. INgraham is media savvy to know about that code, so if she uses it, shame on her.
If you watched Laura Ingram you would know she spent the last few months covering the anti Semitic protests and how the Jewish students were treated and how the heads of the universities testified that it depended on the context whether or not calling for the genocide of Jews violated the rules.
She is not using dog whistles to covertly criticize Jews, globalists means globalists.
She's standing up for Jewish students who were harassed and threatened. What does that have to do Zionism?Zionist antisemitism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
-CryptoLutheran
What does george soros have to do with any of this.This is the equivalent of 1984's newspeak. Any criticism of George Soros is anti-semitism.
How are any of these reference to "globalists" about a "global system of governance"?Calling people who want a global system of governance globalists is anti- semitism.
No.Criticizing Kamala Harris is racist and sexist.
NoCriticizing BLM is racist.
If so, perhaps they should think about why.There's hardly anything a conservative can say that isn't racist, sexist, or anti semitism
Really? I saw plenty of the "logic" regarding Democrat who called for a de-occupied Palestinian state as: Pro-Palestian -> Anti-Israeli -> Anti-Jewish. I could probably find it in posts on this very board.And it's kind of hard to tie the anti Israel, pro Palestinian protesters to the Democratic Party when they are calling Biden Genocide Joe and Harris Killer Kamala.
Well the ones that are openly supporting Hamas are pretty much anti-Israel.What does george soros have to do with any of this.
How are any of these reference to "globalists" about a "global system of governance"?
No.
No
If so, perhaps they should think about why.
Really? I saw plenty of the "logic" regarding Democrat who called for a de-occupied Palestinian state as: Pro-Palestian -> Anti-Israeli -> Anti-Jewish. I could probably find it in posts on this very board.
Most likely. But do you get that anti-Israel and antisemitic aren't the same thing?Well the ones that are openly supporting Hamas are pretty much anti-Israel.
Just saying
Didn't say they were.If you'll get that anti BLM and racist aren't the same thing
She's standing up for Jewish students who were harassed and threatened. What does that have to do Zionism?
The Unite the Right rally was 2 days and it was thoroughly covered.I'm not going to speculate about what I can't know. But I reserve the right to be suspicious that anyone at Fox has genuine concerns about antisemitism.
Where was this concern for antisemitism viz-a-viz the Unite the Right rally years ago?
-CryptoLutheran