- Jun 5, 2020
- 1,412
- 653
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
"In that day the remnant of Israel (E'phraim) and the survivors of Jacob (Judah) will no more lean upon him that smote them, but will lean on YHVH the Holy One of Israel in truth."
There are other passages about treaties, particularly those with Judah’s relationship with Egypt (above). Neither Judah nor E’phraim should “lean on” treaties with G-dless nations to secure peace because this means we are not relying on Him! This doesn’t mean we can’t work towards a cooperating relationship between ourselves and other nations, but we cross a line when putting something other than our Father as the means of peace. Besides this, what other concessions were being put on the bargaining table that don’t belong?
There is Jerusalem, and as Zechariah states, one day the “stone”, Jerusalem the Holy City, would be “lifted” and when it is, all that lifted it will be grievously hurt. This issue of Jerusalem was in the “last status talks” and indeed it was when the two sides reached this point that all hell broke loose for both brothers and their cousins. Yet shouldn’t this be easy to resolve, that Jerusalem is Israel’s?
If so why did He allow the building of the Dome of the Rock on our Holy Mountain? We suspect it is because this makes it harder for anyone to rebuild the Temple, thus placing a stumbling block before our eyes to see if either Judah or E’phraim could pass this rock without lifting it. Yet, lift it we did! Therefore Judah stumbled on the Rock of Salvation and then their brother lifted the rock of the Dome! And so it is written:
“And He will be become a sanctuary, and a stone of offense, and a rock of stumbling for BOTH houses of Israel, a trap and a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And many shall stumble thereon; they shall and be broken; they shall be snared and taken.” Is.8.14-15
Most Christians will say this happened in 70CE, and they would be partly correct. Yes, Yeshua was Judah’s stumbling rock, but this prophecy says for BOTH houses, not just one. One house was still missing when Rome struck Judah. Some may argue that E’phraim did return from Babylon with Judah, however we firmly disagree because of the following facts:
According to Isaiah 7.8, most of E’phraim “ceased to be a nation” and was broken up “as a people” 2700 years ago. This occurred when Assyria exiled them and they did not return from when the Tanakh was formally written down in Babylon, 2Kgs.17.23. A few did flee into Judah to avoid capture and this can be verified from stories in the Brith HaDoshah (New Testament).
There are other passages about treaties, particularly those with Judah’s relationship with Egypt (above). Neither Judah nor E’phraim should “lean on” treaties with G-dless nations to secure peace because this means we are not relying on Him! This doesn’t mean we can’t work towards a cooperating relationship between ourselves and other nations, but we cross a line when putting something other than our Father as the means of peace. Besides this, what other concessions were being put on the bargaining table that don’t belong?
There is Jerusalem, and as Zechariah states, one day the “stone”, Jerusalem the Holy City, would be “lifted” and when it is, all that lifted it will be grievously hurt. This issue of Jerusalem was in the “last status talks” and indeed it was when the two sides reached this point that all hell broke loose for both brothers and their cousins. Yet shouldn’t this be easy to resolve, that Jerusalem is Israel’s?
If so why did He allow the building of the Dome of the Rock on our Holy Mountain? We suspect it is because this makes it harder for anyone to rebuild the Temple, thus placing a stumbling block before our eyes to see if either Judah or E’phraim could pass this rock without lifting it. Yet, lift it we did! Therefore Judah stumbled on the Rock of Salvation and then their brother lifted the rock of the Dome! And so it is written:
“And He will be become a sanctuary, and a stone of offense, and a rock of stumbling for BOTH houses of Israel, a trap and a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And many shall stumble thereon; they shall and be broken; they shall be snared and taken.” Is.8.14-15
Most Christians will say this happened in 70CE, and they would be partly correct. Yes, Yeshua was Judah’s stumbling rock, but this prophecy says for BOTH houses, not just one. One house was still missing when Rome struck Judah. Some may argue that E’phraim did return from Babylon with Judah, however we firmly disagree because of the following facts:
According to Isaiah 7.8, most of E’phraim “ceased to be a nation” and was broken up “as a people” 2700 years ago. This occurred when Assyria exiled them and they did not return from when the Tanakh was formally written down in Babylon, 2Kgs.17.23. A few did flee into Judah to avoid capture and this can be verified from stories in the Brith HaDoshah (New Testament).
Upvote
0