How to prove God exists.

[Radrook]

I am still waiting for you to explain how babies are evidence of God.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how mindless chemicals could design and construct a brain and know that it needed a blood supply and oxygen to function. How your genius magical chemicals knew how to build neurons with computer like attributes in their synapses. How these magic chemicals decided to have a special area in that brain where visual signals would be transmitted from organic camera called the eyes that they decided to build and connect to that area via an optic nerve. Sorry but we just can't buy your glib: "Da chemicals did it!" Mother Goose-Father Rooster story.

 

[Pachomius]

Babies are evidence of God in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

You see, babies are caused by their parents, and parents are caused by their parents, all the way to God as the first and final cause of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

Now, you concur with me to seek evidence and you accept the information of the concept of God above.

Please present your evidence of no God.

 

[Loudmouth]

As I said, you folks proved us right by miserably failing to produce life via chemical means in a lab.

That is an argument from ignorance. Are you sure you took those logic classes, or were you pulling our leg.

 

[Loudmouth]

I'm still waiting for you to explain how mindless chemicals could design and construct a brain and know that it needed a blood supply and oxygen to function.

It's called embryonic development. Look it up. Also, it has nothing to do with magic.

 

[Pachomius]

Dear atheists, do you concur with me that the default status of things in the totality of reality is existence?

 

[Loudmouth]

You see, babies are caused by their parents, and parents are caused by their parents, all the way to God as the first and final cause of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

Where is the evidence demonstrating that God is "the first and final cause of the universe"?

 

[Radrook]

That is an argument from ignorance. Are you sure you took those logic classes, or were you pulling our leg.

Obviously you don't know what an argument from ignorance is.
Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia

Otherwise you would not be tagging what I say as such.

 

[quatona]

Babies are evidence of God in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

You see, babies are caused by their parents, and parents are caused by their parents, all the way to God as the first and final cause of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

 

[Radrook]

Where is the evidence demonstrating that God is "the first and final cause of the universe"?

An intelligent designer is a logically justifiable inference.
The unjustifiable illogical inference is absence of an intelligent designer.

 

[quatona]

Dear atheists, do you concur with me that the default status of things in the totality of reality is existence?

How to prove God exists.

 

[Loudmouth]

Obviously you don't know what an argument from ignorance is.
Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia

Ad Ignorantium

(also known as: appeal to ignorance, absence of evidence, argument from personal astonishment, argument from Incredulity)

Description: The assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of evidence to the contrary.
Argument from Ignorance
​

You are pointing to the lack of evidence for abiogenesis (the contrary) as evidence for intelligent design. That is an argument from ignorance. This is Logic 101, and you are getting it completely wrong. Were you being honest about taking those classes?

 

[Loudmouth]

An intelligent designer is a logically justifiable inference.

And yet you can't justify it.

 

[Pachomius]

Dear atheists, the series of causation from babies to parents all the way to the beginning of the universe, that is the evidence of the existence of the creator first and last cause and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

Now, you present your evidence of no causation from babies to parents all the way to no God, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

Next, tell me, atheists, do you concur with me that the default status of things in the totality of reality is existence?

 

[HitchSlap]

oops

 

[HitchSlap]

What do you atheists here say, babies not evidence of God?

Right, babies are not evidence of god/s. Hang in there Pachy, I think you're starting to get a grip.

 

[HitchSlap]

An intelligent designer is a logically justifiable inference.
The unjustifiable illogical inference is absence of an intelligent designer.

So are purple Tuesday farting pixies. Go ahead, prove I'm wrong. Oh, and BTW, it's illogical for you not to believe this.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

I thought it was going to be abiogenesis. Either it is abiogenesis and the proposition is that human beings have existed as long as the universe has, or there's a couple of steps missing.

 

[Pachomius]

Please, atheists, you also seek evidence as I do, but for God not existing.

Now, present your evidence.

And tell me, do you accept that the default status of things in the totality of reality is existence?

 

[HitchSlap]

And you know this how?

LOL....

 

[HitchSlap]

Please, atheists, you also seek evidence as I do, but for God not existing.

Now, present your evidence.