• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How to not fool yourself

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,825
44,936
Los Angeles Area
✟1,001,149.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
I'm not sure. Surely an authority on any given subject is a de facto expert in that subject.

I think Sagan's point is that we should accept the tentative consensus conclusions of scientific experts not because an authority says so, but because that's where evidence has led expert opinion.

I think it's a good list for s scientist. But for the guy in the street?
Obviously, there's only so much time in the day for both the man in the street and the scientific experts, but if the man asks "Why do you think life we see today evolved from earlier forms?" an expert should not respond "Because I say so," but should begin talking about homologies and fossils and DNA and...

And of course, any motivated man in the street can poke around Wikipedia or Evolution 101 or the Smithsonian or the NCSE or... and see the evidence and reasoning laid out.
 
Upvote 0

J_B_

I have answers to questions no one ever asks.
May 15, 2020
1,332
385
Midwest
✟126,025.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I think Sagan's point is that we should accept the tentative consensus conclusions of scientific experts not because an authority says so, but because that's where evidence has led expert opinion.

That's a proper distinction to make, but it all depends on the audience. The expert should maintain that principle, but also has to realize that he may be speaking to an audience who is only hearing Charlie Brown's teacher.


'Motivated' is an important adjective here. I don't know what crowd you circulate amongst in your real life, but in mine very few people care diddly about any of this. As a result, they simply trust the opinion of the one in their peer group who best speaks to their situation.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,612
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,525.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

You make it sound so neat and tidy.

But the fact of the matter is, to get Pluto plutoed, they had to:
  1. Rig a vote.
  2. Violate their own bylaws.
  3. Reject any scientists' conclusions to the contrary.
  4. Rewrite the dictionary.
Some top-notch chiseling and force-fitting and shenanigans were involved in getting Pluto downgraded.

You can shrug your shoulders and say it's "just a definition" and "no big deal."

But ...
  1. The California State Assembly called it a "scientific heresy."
  2. The New Mexico House o Representatives passed a resolution that, as long as Pluto is in their skies, it will be considered a planet.
  3. The Illinois Senate passed a resolution that asserted that Pluto was "unfairly downgraded to a dwarf planet by the IAU."
QV please:

Public reception to the IAU decision was mixed. A resolution introduced in the California State Assembly facetiously called the IAU decision a "scientific heresy". The New Mexico House of Representatives passed a resolution in honor of Clyde Tombaugh, the discoverer of Pluto and a longtime resident of that state, that declared that Pluto will always be considered a planet while in New Mexican skies and that March 13, 2007 was Pluto Planet Day. The Illinois Senate passed a similar resolution in 2009 on the basis that Tombaugh was born in Illinois. The resolution asserted that Pluto was "unfairly downgraded to a 'dwarf' planet" by the IAU." Some members of the public have also rejected the change, citing the disagreement within the scientific community on the issue, or for sentimental reasons, maintaining that they have always known Pluto as a planet and will continue to do so regardless of the IAU decision.

SOURCE

People can get on my case about my stance on Pluto, but the fact of the matter is that there are government bodies much higher than I that disagree with Pluto's demotion as well.

And all I do is rant & rave about it on the Internet, but these government bodies have done something about it.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,612
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,525.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I wonder if the Quantum sciences will closer explain the spirit someday.

I doubt it.

But if they ever do, I'm almost positive they'd get it wrong.

They can't find evidence of two million Jews living in a desert for forty years, let alone quantify God.

I hear from researchers in nutrition science that some have personal biases when researching nutrition.

If you want to hear "personal biases" in any science -- not just nutrition science -- just put on your job application that you believe in a literal interpretation of Genesis 1 and see where that [doesn't] get you.
 
Upvote 0

The IbanezerScrooge

I can't believe what I'm hearing...
Sep 1, 2015
3,458
5,852
51
Florida
✟310,363.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
But none of that is a failure of science. ??

The important part of it is that nothing about Pluto changed. It's still there. It's still orbiting the Sun and we still haven't observed it make a full orbit.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,612
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,525.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I'd love a man on the street to stop me and ask me that.

Of course, I'd have to speak extra peritia (outside of expertise) on it.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,612
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,525.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But none of that is a failure of science. ??

You don't consider rigged votes or violations of bylaws as failures of science?

That's your prerogative.

Would you at least consider it "disrespectful"?
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,825
44,936
Los Angeles Area
✟1,001,149.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
'Motivated' is an important adjective here.
Absolutely. And the time factor applies to all of us. We rely on experts all the time. We don't interrogate our airline pilots or meteorologists (though we may trust the former a little more than the latter).
As a result, they simply trust the opinion of the one in their peer group who best speaks to their situation.
I'd rather they relied on experts than peers, because (as you see in #26) AV is itching to answer such questions. But I understand your point.
 
Upvote 0

J_B_

I have answers to questions no one ever asks.
May 15, 2020
1,332
385
Midwest
✟126,025.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Mmm. We engineers may carry a chip on our shoulders with respect to "expertise". We're constantly told we don't do science, just implement it. But stories abound of science handing something to engineers that doesn't work and needs a lot more research and development.

IMHO it's because science (At least the science I work with) often relies on idealized systems rather than real systems.

The result is, I'd trust the airline pilot as the expert more than the aerospace engineer and much more than the physicist. Granted the airline pilot won't have anything to fly without the engineer and the physicist, but still, when physicists become media talking heads, again it's like Charlie Brown's teacher.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,612
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,525.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We don't interrogate our airline pilots or meteorologists (though we may trust the former a little more than the latter).

Oh, yes we do!

 
Upvote 0

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
5,111
2,469
65
NM
✟106,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
literal interpretation of Genesis
I don't. How can we accurately translate an ancient language passed on verbally for generations. "God created" is all I'm concerned with by faith. And no one can prove or disprove it.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,612
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,525.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How can we accurately translate an ancient language passed on verbally for generations.

God took care of that for us in 1611.

But, of course, it wasn't good enough for academia, and they want their own translations.

Now look what we got.

A Heinz-57 variety of versions.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,424
7,159
73
St. Louis, MO.
✟415,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
That's ridiculous. Don't elected state representatives have better things to do than squabble over a name? Heck, a lot of outdated medical names for diseases have changed:

Consumption > tuberculosis
Grippe > influenza
Leprosy > Hansen's disease
Blood poisoning > septicemia
Apoplexy > stroke
Quinsy > tonsillitis
Blue baby syndrome > infant methemoglobinemia

And there are many more.

From planet to dwarf planet is nothing more than a name change to reflect a more accurate astronomical understanding.
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,108
12,981
78
✟432,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I will argue anyone who disagrees that science is myopic.

And as such, can't be trusted to meddle in areas of spiritual Truths.
Neither science nor religion are "myopic." There might be a few scientists who claim that science can address the supernatural, and a few religious people who think religion is a way to do science.

But they don't know what they are talking about.
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,612
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,525.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That's ridiculous. Don't elected state representatives have better things to do than squabble over a name? Heck, a lot of outdated medical names for diseases have changed:
...
From planet to dwarf planet is nothing more than a name change to reflect a more accurate astronomical understanding.

If it was that simple, why the rigged vote in violation of their own bylaws?

QV please:

Only four percent of the IAU voted on the controversial demotion of Pluto, and most are not planetary scientists. The vote was conducted in violation of the IAU's own bylaws on the last day of a two-week conference when most attendees already had left. No absentee voting was allowed. Supporters of the demotion resolution violated the IAU's own bylaws by putting this resolution on the General Assembly floor without first vetting it by the proper committee as IAU rules require. Also, many planetary scientists do not belong to the IAU and therefore had no say in this matter. When professional astronomers objecting to the demotion asked for a reopening of the planet debate at the 2009 IAU General Assembly, the IAU leadership adamantly refused. Why would they refuse to reopen a debate unless they were insecure about their stand? Meanwhile, this issue continues to be debated in other venues, such as the 2008 Great Planet Debate, held at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab in August 2008 (which I personally attended), the American Geophysical Union, and the European Geophysical Union.

FROM THIS THREAD
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,612
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,525.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Neither science nor religion are "myopic."



Science is either myopic, blind, or omniscient.

Take your pick.

If you want to argue that it's not myopic ... fine.

I'm sure you'll agree it's not omniscient.

That leaves only one left:

Blind.

So go ahead and argue it's not myopic.

You'll just make it worse.
 
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
5,745
4,677
✟347,440.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,424
7,159
73
St. Louis, MO.
✟415,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
This is a tempest not just in a teapot, but a thimble—and a tiny thimble at that. I’d suggest that if astronomers offended by Pluto’s demotion can’t get a re-vote, then they should consider forming their own astronomical union and vote to restore Pluto’s previous status. I’d never pay dues to any organization that I thought was wrong-headed.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,612
52,511
Guam
✟5,128,525.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This is a tempest not just in a teapot, but a thimble—and a tiny thimble at that.

Wow -- just wow.

If you can't see crooks in your own backyard, I'm done.
 
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,424
7,159
73
St. Louis, MO.
✟415,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Science is either myopic, blind, or omniscient.

Science is a way of learning about how the universe, and life on our planet, came to exist and how they operate. It does this from a purely naturalistic standpoint. If you think that’s myopic, fine. It’s your prerogative. For sure, science isn’t perfect, but what human endeavor is? To me, it’s as obvious as the sun in the sky that a scientific outlook is infinitely more accurate, more reliable, and more useful than any ancient religious scriptures or beliefs have ever been.
 
Upvote 0