VirOptimus
A nihilist who cares.
No, this is false.
Your position is like looking around, deciding the earth is flat and never accepting data that disproves that position.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not really. We look at the same facts but arrive at different conclusions. I don't look in the bible to determine if the human eye was purposefully designed; I look at the human eye. You look at the same eye and determine that it evolved over billions of years but present virtually no details of how this occured. I would indeed be delusional if I accepted your position.
No, this is false.
Your position is like looking around, deciding the earth is flat and never accepting data that disproves that position.
LOL! It's not IQ you're lacking, it's willingness to take the risk that you might find it convincing.I don't have the mental ability to understand the data that supports evolution (I only have an IQ of 135).
LOL! It's not IQ you're lacking, it's willingness to take the risk that you might find it convincing.
No poo, sherlock.
It also shows that I'm me and not my sister.
Your direct ancestor indeed is not my ancestor. But we do share ancestors.
And we can also show that my grand, grand, grand,...., grand mom IS yours as well.
It can.
huh?
That didn't even make any sense. Not that the rest made sense, but that one was especially terrible.
Ive googled. And you know that's not what I'm talking about. What you are seeing is adaptation not evolution from a common ancestor. You see micro evolution of a creature evolving in order to survive yet remaining in the same family. It's not eloving to be something else.google observed speciation.
Why do you need to do all that? Assuming you had a decent high-school education (including biology) you could read it up yourself, maybe take freshman bio and genetics courses on line or at the local JC. The most important thing for most creationists to do who really want to learn about what the theory of evolution is about is to stop relying on the propaganda put out by the creationist "ministries," AiG, ICR, CMI, etc.I also don't have the time (college, post graduate education, fellowships, field work, etc. would be necessary), or the money needed.
It's evolving into another species. That's all the change you will ever see in evolution, repeated over and over. Neither "family" nor any of the other taxa are pre-existing categories into which creatures evolve. They aren't created until evolution has already occurred.Ive googled. And you know that's not what I'm talking about. What you are seeing is adaptation not evolution from a common ancestor. You see micro evolution of a creature evolving in order to survive yet remaining in the same family. It's not eloving to be something else.
Why do you need to do all that? Assuming you had a decent high-school education (including biology) you could read it up yourself, maybe take freshman bio and genetics courses on line or at the local JC. The most important thing for most creationists to do who really want to learn about what the theory of evolution is about is to stop relying on the propaganda put out by the creationist "ministries," AiG, ICR, CMI, etc.
Yeah. So what?
This is vague, but It's not accurate. People who have shared ancestors will share more DNA. I took an Ancestry test as did my 1c 1x and she showed up as a cousin in my Ancestry results. A whole bunch of cousins in my dad's side took tests and they show up as well - all because we have a shared common ancestor.
This simply is false. All DNA can be used to show common ancestry within and between species.
This makes zero sense.
So what that an ant evolved into another ant with bigger jaws. It's still an ant and belongs in the ant family. The peppered moth is still a moth. It will never be anything else. Common ancestry says all things came from one thing. Ants cows bees cats monkeys and humans all evolved from one creature. Yet observation has NEVER show that to have occurred or that it's even possible. It assumes it did because that's the only way it could have in the evolutionists mind.It's evolving into another species. That's all the change you will ever see in evolution, repeated over and over. Neither "family" nor any of the other taxa are pre-existing categories into which creatures evolve. They aren't created until evolution has already occurred.
So what that an ant evolved into another ant with bigger jaws. It's still an ant and belongs in the ant family. The peppered moth is still a moth. It will never be anything else. Common ancestry says all things came from one thing. Ants cows bees cats monkeys and humans all evolved from one creature. Yet observation has NEVER show that to have occurred or that it's even possible. It assumes it did because that's the only way it could have in the evolutionists mind.
You can't show how that is even possible.
You know that despite creationist organization disinformation, scientists can show how this happens .for example, wasps and ants are so closely related that some living ants have wings and stingers. We see these intermediate transitionals even among living organisms. So seeing fossil intermediates is just icing on the cake.
Disinformation is deliberate misinformation and yes it’s deliberate.
Why can't ants with stingers just be ants with stingers? Why do they have to be related to the wasp? If they took a blind DNA test of thus ant and a wasp would they be able to tell rhe difference? Of course they would. Similarities do not prove evolution.
Then where do you get your straw man?
What I meant was that to an evolutionist everything under the sun evolved, even thoughts. There's no end to it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?