VirOptimus
A nihilist who cares.
I have not insulted you, I do have attacked your ”ideas” however. Its you who called me a troll.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You think his arguments are well evidenced? That's laughable, he is the resident troll who will do nothing but insult me through the course of the thread. There is always one.
I don't worry, I just haven't seen it. As far as my personal faith, I could easily rearrange my theology to accommodate a Darwinian worldview. I just remain unconvinced and the fact that theistic evolutionists are incapable of work in doctrine doesn't help their case much.
It would all depend.
I WOULD IN A HEART BEAT! I even contemplated eating armadillos in order to catch leprosy!There's no explanation of "first life" with germ theory either, but I'm willing to bet you're not going to lick a leper.
No you've done nothing but insult me, but there is always one of you in these threads, I expect it.I have not insulted you, I do have attacked your ”ideas” however. Its you who called me a troll.
The heart condition.Depend on what?
Evolution is a phenomenon not the philosophy of natural history you are calling evolution.I think the evidence to support evolution, is extremely well evidenced, yes.
No you've done nothing but insult me, but there is always one of you in these threads, I expect it.
If you had the slightest interest in science I might have.If you started to post real science your ideas wouldnt get attacked.
If you had the slightest interest in science I might have.
Well those are useless in this discussion so far.Oh but I do, and I have the degrees to prove it.
Evolution is the best explanation for the evidence we have. Pardigm shifts are common as new evidence comes to the surface for people to examine. Science books go though constant revision. The Bible does not need revised although there are always new translations and our interpretation goes through the same sort of revision we see with Science. Only the original Hebrew Biblical language is dependable.If you study evolution, with an open mind, you will likely believe in evolution.
Evolution is a scientific theory and a well evidenced one, with practical uses that have been substantiated.
I understand your position to not go along with this evidence, though.
It's not a theory, it's a phenomenon in nature. It's the change of alleles (traits) in populations over time. The a priori assumption of universal common ancestry is presupposition, not science.
I'm well acquainted with the fossil and genomic evidence, I have no problem going along with it, just remain unconvinced.
Oh what a load.The simple words about how God caused Adam to sleep and removed a bone from his side and built Eve, was not even understandable until we understood scientifically that rib bones contain multipotent DNA from which God could build Eve and that rib bones grow back if the sheath which houses it is left intact by the surgeon.
So, for thousands of years we could only look at that and wonder. Yet, men since the beginning have been assigning ideas to the text without any ideas of what it could mean.
Then, we should accept what the bible says as it has proven to be good information even if we have no ideas of why or how. Science is a big help in these matters.
Paul said that we will know God by the things He has made. That's a lot of science!
How? Did the animal just decide to modify its DNA?until over time they made more permanent changes to suit the new environment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?