• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How to become a Calvinist in 5 easy steps

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,715.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Yes I have an answer for this from Romans 9. Your point is very compelling no doubt brother. And reading Romans 9:14-21 seems to support this interpretation as well. Until you get to verse 22.

“What shall we say then? There is no injustice with God, is there? May it never be! For He says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I raised you up, to demonstrate My power in you, and that My name might be proclaimed throughout the whole earth.” So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires. You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, “Why did you make me like this,” will it? Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for common use? What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭9‬:‭14‬-‭24‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

Why did God endure with much patience the vessels of wrath? Here is my answer.

“Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and tolerance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God,”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭2‬:‭4‬-‭5‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

“But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.”
‭‭2 Peter‬ ‭3‬:‭7‬-‭9‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

God uses the wicked to set examples and to show His might & glory to those of us who humble ourselves to Him and repent. But His kindness and patience towards the wicked and unrepentant is to give them time to repent so that when they stand before Him on Judgement Day they will have no excuse and be rightly deserving of His wrath and justice upon them. Just like in Acts 4:28 all those people whom God chose to use this way were set against Christ. We know that Pontiff Pilate and Herod were unrepentant and most of the Gentiles and a lot of the Israelites. I suspect that every person He chose to use in this plan were unrepentant and wicked. I don’t recall God using His humble servants in this way. I would say that this was another example just like what He did with Pharaoh to show His glory to His followers, perhaps even to the unrepentant in order to bring them to repentance.
 
Reactions: fhansen
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,715.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

God didn’t harden Pharaoh’s heart every time. I believe He did harden Pharaoh’s heart the first time but then Pharaoh hardened his own heart afterwards. Several times if I’m not mistaken. I apologize it’s 9:30pm so I just saw your post right as I was getting ready for bed so I don’t have time to look it up. Feel free to correct me if I’m mistaken but I believe it was Pharaoh that hardened his heart more times than God did. I also discussed this in the previous post to brother Mike. Post 141. That gives some explanation.
 
Reactions: Brother-Mike
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
15,913
3,977
✟384,762.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Well, according to the bible God hardens men’s hearts-and men harden their own hearts-as if they could do otherwise-as if choice was involved.

Anyway, so much for sola scriptura, the doctrine that allows man-and woman-to come up with all kinds of personal, novel opinions, based on an isolated passage or two, many of which were never intended to be a fully worked out and clarified theological treatise on a given matter. That would come later and the church has done so, to the extent possible.

Anyway, predestination is a secondary issue as long as a person understands that the will of man is necessarily involved in his salvation regardless-because otherwise the gospel would be subverted. And the concept impacts no one directly anyway since none can know with 100% certainty that they’re a member of the elect, that they, personally, will persevere, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,985.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
I didn't say you were wrong in your statement, (MMXX said): ↑
"The longer it takes a theology to come into existence and the less accepted it is, the more likely it is that it's man-made."

In that very post you had been talking about doctrines based on scripture, and so what I said was that that statement was not one of them.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,985.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
It's predestination....just two of 'em .

(It's God chose a group to save and in the same way He chose a group to damn).

There it is, just as I was saying. In its barest meaning, it is logically arrived at very simply. God made all things, knowing the ends thereof. Therefore, what he made for Heaven necessarily excludes all other things.

But no, you have to say, he chose one group "in the same way" he chose the other. You imply that his whole reason for one group was salvation and all it entails, but then also that his whole reason for another group was perdition and all it entails. Truth is, that is not so. He made them for his uses, which includes what Romans 9 says outright, for demonstrating to those he has chosen, his justice, mercy and glory. THIS is his primary reason for making them.

But that is why I shrink back from saying I believe in double-predestination: Because those who oppose the notion that God causes all things will use the term falsely.
 
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,985.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Well, according to the bible God hardens men’s hearts-and men harden their own hearts-as if they could do otherwise-as if choice was involved.
There it is again: 'Choice' does not imply more than one thing is possible. It only implies a choice is made between two or more things one considers possible. But they will only choose according to their inclinations, EVERY time. Only one thing is ever chosen, and at that, for the unregenerate, is always against God.
 
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,538
15,033
PNW
✟963,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
And I pointed out that while there's not a verse in the Bible which says that, it's historically true nonetheless.

Also you said "In fact, in some places Scripture seems to say almost the opposite". So I'd be interested in seeing such scripture.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,538
15,033
PNW
✟963,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I don't recall saying any of that. I simply lean more towards God created man with free will to choose or reject the Gospel. Rather than he created only a few who would have no choice but to except the gospel, and created the vast majority to have no choice but to reject the gospel.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,985.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
MMXX said: ↑
I've heard words to that effect regarding several different doctrines. They're all said to be "the Word of God", "what God said", "what Jesus taught", "what the apostles taught", usually specifically "what Paul taught" and "what James taught". It's a one size fits all apologetic.

Which even you hold to.
What do you mean?
I mean that you, too, do the same thing. Like all of us, you think you draw what you believe from Scripture.
 
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
15,913
3,977
✟384,762.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Sure, and the regenerate always choose for God, and never for sin, right? It’s not that neat and clean. The unregenerate are not so dead as to have nothing to work with, nothing to draw, nothing to appeal to even as there’s nothing in themselves that can move and turn them to God. And even as they respond and enter God’s family they are not so fully changed as to now always choose rightly. It’s a journey, a process.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,985.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
It isn't really surprising, though. Most of Christendom is Calvinistic in some ways and maybe all of Protestantism is, including Arminianism, though not in all their tenets.

Apparently while you were once a Calvinist, you didn't notice that, while they fellowship gladly with one-another for recognized joy in the beliefs they hold in common, they are, some of them, easily at each other's throats for details they consider heretical.
 
Upvote 0

Brother-Mike

Predetermined to freely believe
Aug 16, 2022
626
537
Toronto
✟49,841.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
Frankly, when non-Calvinists aren’t arguing about Calvinism I tend to agree with them 90% of the time. When they argue that drops to 50%
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,985.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
And I pointed out that while there's not a verse in the Bible which says that, it's historically true nonetheless.

Also you said "In fact, in some places Scripture seems to say almost the opposite". So I'd be interested in seeing such scripture.
Here's one, right off the top of my mind. Ephesians 3: "4 In reading this, then, you will be able to understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, 5 which was not made known to people in other generations as it has now been revealed by the Spirit to God’s holy apostles and prophets."

 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,985.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Frankly, when non-Calvinists aren’t arguing about Calvinism I tend to agree with them 90% of the time. When they argue that drops to 50%
Agreed. And that increases when they are praying. Sometimes they sound positively Calvinistic, at recognizing that God causes all things, and that whatsoever comes to pass is up to him.
 
Reactions: Brother-Mike
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,538
15,033
PNW
✟963,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I mean that you, too, do the same thing. Like all of us, you think you draw what you believe from Scripture.
Of course. But then it depends on how what I believe stands up to scrutiny. For instance, lets say someone believes scripture says a certain thing, but the majority of Christianity disagrees with it both currently and historically. In that case we're left with two conclusions. Either that person has special enlightenment and everyone else is and has been blind. Or that person is in error. I feel confident in saying that usually the latter conclusion is correct.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,538
15,033
PNW
✟963,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Frankly, when non-Calvinists aren’t arguing about Calvinism I tend to agree with them 90% of the time. When they argue that drops to 50%
I think most of the time most of those arguing a particular point of doctrine, agree with each other regarding most everything else.
 
Reactions: Brother-Mike
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,538
15,033
PNW
✟963,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Agreed. And that increases when they are praying. Sometimes they sound positively Calvinistic, at recognizing that God causes all things, and that whatsoever comes to pass is up to him.
When it come to Calvinism there's the particular sticky point regarding free will, which sets it apart and makes it controversial. You and I are probably mostly in agreement overall.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,715.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

I don’t think this is correct because the scriptures say “He chose us according to His foreknowledge” and “for those whom He foreknew He predestined”. Predestined means to choose beforehand so he chose us beforehand according to His choosing us beforehand? That doesn’t make sense. Predestined and foreknowledge are two different things. Your saying they are the same thing but they’re not. The Greek word that is used is prognosis. I’m sure we all know what gnosis means. It means knowledge. Prognosis means forecast or prediction.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Blaise N

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2021
824
663
Midwest US
✟167,003.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
No no no.What the Lord means is that People who Claim to be Christian’s and don’t produce the fruits of the spirit indicating true rebirth of the spirit are cast away.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,715.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
No no no.What the Lord means is that People who Claim to be Christian’s and don’t produce the fruits of the spirit indicating true rebirth of the spirit are cast away.

That would mean that they weren’t actually in Christ. False professors aren’t actually in Christ. Jesus said “every branch in Me”.
 
Upvote 0