Sorry, if they understood the tongues in a human language, The Holy Spirit then operated the gift of interpretation, period. The two gifts always work in conjunction for understanding.
Wrong! Only the Korean understood the tongues in his own language and no gift of interpretation was activated. Of course, the same is true of the tongues in Acts 2. There too no gift of interpretation is cited. Only the native speakers of the languages were able to pick out their own languages (Greek: "dialektoi"--Acts 2:6). In fact, the group speaking in tongues in the 2 other cases in Acts (10:44-47; 19:1-6) is never interpreted or understood. To deny this in support of your interpretive agenda is to read something into the text that is not there. I challenge you to find even one academic book commentary on Acts that supports your biased perspective!
The Greek "glossai" normally means "HUMAN languages," and so, prayer tongues must at least include human languages. Indeed, there is no reason to deny that private prayer tongues (2 Cor. 14:4, 28) can be spoken in a human language as in the case of the United Methodist minister I cited.
Paul allows an exception--"tongues of angels" (1 Cor. 13:1; 14:12) and this view is retained in the early 2nd century in an understanding of prophetic speech as angel speech (Hermas Mandates 11:9).
Upvote
0