• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How to Authentically Speak in Tongues

Status
Not open for further replies.

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Growing up in a large Pentecostal church, I soon came to the reluctant conclusion that most speaking in tongues is of the flesh. So a future post will explain what to do and not do, when one actually begins to pray for the gift of tongues. But my OP focuses on preliminary prayer disciplines that facilitate reception of the authentic gift of tongues.

I. PREPARATION:
(1) Praying in tongues is a form of praying in the Spirit (1 Corinthians 14:14). So to speak in tongues authentically, it is advisable to first learn to "pray in the Spirit" (Ephesians 6:18; Jude 20) in your own language. Paul makes it clear that praying in the Spirit is a key to waging effective spiritual warfare (Ephesians 6:11-18). Praying in the Spirit is spontaneous Spirit-directed prayer as opposed to consciously formulated prayers of intent. Once you learn to pray with an uncontrolled flow of words and thoughts in your own language, it is easier to surrender to speaking in tongues as the Spirit gives utterance.

(2) The expression "lost in praise" designates a particular type of praying in the Spirit that is often a launching pad for speaking in tongues. Being lost in praise is a type of intense longing for God in which the eruption of joy triggers spontaneous and uncontrolled praise in one's own language. It is the Lord who guides the praise: "O Lord, open my lips, and my mouth will declare your praise (Psalm 51:15)." This type of praise is superior because it reflects and derives from "the inner being" and "my secret heart" with which I am usually out of touch (51:6). Much of what we pass off as praise is forced and mechanical; so the Spirit's intervention is needed to create a "willing spirit" (51:12)." If our worship is too much of a head trip rather than a heart eruption, we may lose the Holy Spirit as an active force in our lives: "Do not cast me away from your presence and don't take your Holy Spirit from me (51:11)."

(3) To learn to pray in the Spirit, one should first learn how to "walk in the Spirit." Walking in the Spirit is often misunderstood as mere conscious obedience to God's Word, when in fact it is a more mystical way of life than that--the believer must learn to surrender by mastering the art of being "led by the Spirit (Galatians 5:25)." Unless believers has mastered this art, they will not experience all "the fruit of the Spirit (5:22-23)."

In my next planned post, I will share my testimony of how I learned to pray in the Spirit.
 

timewerx

the village i--o--t--
Aug 31, 2012
16,683
6,334
✟369,376.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
It isn't something that is taught nor should be sought after. Isn't bad either if you can't.

I know of many who can "speak in tongues" but is completely deceived and unknowingly serving the devil and end up spreading the lies of the devil instead like loving the things of this world and loving money.
 
Upvote 0

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
timwerx: "It isn't something that is taught nor should be sought after."
Now you are disrespecting the work of the Holy Spirit as taught in God's Word.

Paul commands us to "earnestly strive for the greater spiritual gifts" (12:31)--a command that includes speaking in tongues, to which he refers in the next verse. The greatest spiritual gift to strive for is prophecy, but speaking in tongues is just as great, if it is interpreted:

"One who prophesies is greater than one who speaks in tongues, UNLESS SOMEONE INTERPETS, so that the church may be built up (14:5).
So unlike other spiritual gifts (12:30), speaking in tongues and prophecy are gifts for every believer:
"You can ALL prophesy one by one (14:31)."

Then Paul says, "want you all to speak in tongues (14:5)." So who are you to trivialize an apostolic desire expressed in God's Word? This is in no way undermined by Paul's preference for corporate prophesying. In fact, Paul feels that the Corinthians, despite their abuses of tongues, don't speak in tongues often enough: "I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you (14;18)." But Paul leaves it to our discernment how this gift "should be sought after." Hence, the purpose of this thread.

timewerx: "[It] Isn't bad either if you can't."

What the Holy Spirit has to offer and intends for every believer must not be treated as unnecessary junk!
timewerx: "I know of many who can "speak in tongues" but is completely deceived and unknowingly serving the devil and end up spreading the lies of the devil instead like loving the things of this world and loving money."

So there is research demonstrating that evangelical pastors are more sexually abusive than Catholic priests. Indeed, no less than 3 pastors in the church of my youth were guilty of misconduct with women. But it is the essence of bigotry to judge a whole movement by its worst exemplars. You must learn to take believers one at a time. You also need to recognize that Satan counterfeits the authentic spiritual manifestations (like speaking in tongues) that pose the greatest threat to his evil purposes.
 
Reactions: lismore
Upvote 0

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
  1. The best way to illustrate how to speak in tongues is to share my own testimony of Spirit baptism. But first readers may find it helpful to read about my 3 prior childhood encounters with the Spirit that prepared me for BY FAR the best experiential day of my life: (1) There was no children's church in Calvary Temple. So I was a squirmy unhappy 5-year-old when I was forced to sit through a 1 1/2 hour long Pentecostal Sunday worship service week after week. In frustration my parents stayed home one July Sunday and I was ecstatic. I rode my little tricycle up and down the block, noticing the newly polished blue Chevy with huge tailfins parked behind the Jewish shoe store on the corner. I delighted in how it shone in the sunlight and returned to renew my delight again and again.

  2. Then it happened. As I again approached the Chevy, my attention was suddenly directed to a patch of blue sky next to the sun. Wave after wave of liquid love surged through my being, as I suddenly became aware that there really was a God who loved me. I told my parents about my experience, but it didn't register--until neighbors later came over and expressed delight in my testimony to God's love to their own little children.

    I still hated church and used to sneak out to buy life savers and browse comic books at the little store across the street from the church. After a while, the storekeeper shooed me out and I vividly recall standing outside the store, sucking on my life savers and pondering the meaning of life.
    (2) At age 11. I decided to please my parents by requesting water baptism. I had to attend catechetical classes and was the only child present. I recall all the abstract talk of propitiation, justification, and sanctification, which added up to so much excruciation for me because I had no clue what those big words meant. The teacher told us (quoting Colossians) that we needed to be "circumcised in spirit," which might have been meaningful if I'd known what circumcision is!

    Finally, 11 adult men and one child (me) were baptized in a Sunday evening service before 1,5OO people. I was terrified, especially because we were all expected to share our personal testimonies and I was too nervous to address that huge crowd. When my time finally came to wade out in the huge baptismal tank behind the pulpit, I was afraid my black robe would float up, exposing my nakedness. I was humiliated when the pastor asked me to share my testimony because I was the only one who declined to do so. So the pastor asked me some catechetical questions about what I believed instead. By this time, humiliated, I just wanted to get it over with. But after being dunked, I emerged from the water to be greeted by a vision of a smiling Jesus--the only waking vision I have ever had. He conveyed both amusement and empathy at my predicament and His presence transformed an embarrassing experience into one of the most sacred moments of my life. Like Jesus, I had experienced a vision of the divine at my baptism.

    (3) These 2 ecstatic and visionary childhood experiences made me hungry for more of God, or rather, more direct encounters with God. Bible reading and sermons didn't fulfill this need; so my attention was riveted to messages in tongues and the interpretations that often highlighted Communion service after Sunday morning worship. I was thrilled by the prospect of hearing direct revelation from Jesus that was relevant to my life. I had one of 2 reactions to Jesus' so-called messages through tongues: either I was profoundly moved to tears the moment the speaker erupted in tongues or I froze as if confronted by a cobra the moment the message was given. I just ached to hear the real thing. Unfortunately, my negative reactions far outnumbered the awesome blessings and this triggered doubts not only about the genuineness of the gifts of the Spirit, but about whether the Bible really contained God's Word after all. My skepticism was increased by the fact that these negative discernments usually applied to interpretations of tongues given by authoritative denominational leaders. Decades later, I came to realize that the Lord had in fact given this 12-14 year-old this gift of spiritual discernment. These doubts were compounded by exposure to evolutionary theory and apparent errors and contradictions in Scripture and my faith crisis became so severe that I think I would have permanently lost my faith and become an agnostic, were it not for an unbelievably awesome experience of Spirit baptism at age 16, which was BY FAR the highlight of my life. I will recount the build-up to that experience in my next planned post.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
  1. (4) In desperation at age 16, I sought to regain my devastated faith by attending the Pentecostal camp meetings at Manhattan Beach on Pelican Lake (Manitoba). Of course, speaking in uninterpreted tongues was not allowed during the public evening services, but we were encouraged to tarry at the altar after the service to seek God's face. When I tarried there, I was determined not to succumb to wishful thinking by just "stepping out in faith" and speaking in tongues. So I just waited there, pleading with God to make Himself real to me, but with no expectation of a divine answer. Then on Tuesday, I went on a 7-mile prayer walk toward the nearest town (Ninette) during which I made 2 points clear to God: (1) If I was going to serve Him, I needed to do so with integrity; so I needed Him to make Himself real to me to prevent me from renouncing my faith. (2) I promised Him that if He made Himself real to me, I'd serve Him with all my heart and mind throughout my life.

    When I returned to the campground, I was very hungry and went to the refectory to buy dinner. Then the thought occurred to me to do something I'd never done in my young life--to fast instead and put my dinner money in the evening offering. After the evening service, I dutifully went to the altar and knelt woodenly in unexpectant prayer, resisting every impulse to surrender to contrived wishful thinking. Then a strange thing happened--I felt what I assumed was an evening breeze coming into the amphitheater off the adjacent lake. But it was no ordinary breeze; it was the wind of the Holy Spirit enveloping my entire being, possessing me and compelling me to speak in tongues at the top of my voice. Wave after wave of liquid love surged through me, each wave more intense than the last! It was a hundred times sweeter and more powerful experience of God's love than anything I have experienced before or since. At one point it seemed like my mind was about to be absorbed in God mind and this was marvelous yet terrifying because it felt like me ego was about to be extinguished in the absorption. I have no doubt that any of my readers had this experience they'd view it as the happiest and most spiritually profound experience of their lives!

    By now the amphitheater was darkening and I noticed a man and a woman sitting nearby. I asked the woman why she was staring at me and she replied, "Don't you know? Your face is glowing in the dark!" A Lutheran pastor approached me and said, "I'm just here as an interested observer and I don't believe in speaking in tongues, but I can see that God is doing something special in your life." Rather than argue with him, I gently touched him on the forhead and he just exploded in other tongues.

  2. I soon realized that God had been speaking to me through this experience. He said, "Son, you're desperate for answers to your difficult burning questions, but right now such answers aren't good for you because you need to live from your heart rather than your head. Instead, I want you to just live with the big questions until they lead you to the center of my heart."
    Then I realize that this tongues experience had transformed my mind and I received a word of knowledge that I would be acknowledged has having the highest academic average in the province in my senior year of high school. A blown-up photo of the premier of Manitoba, Duff Roblyn, shaking my hand at my graduation in acknowledgement of this achievement sits on my living room table as a testimony to God's grace and transforming power. The scholarships arising from that achievement helped finance my long educational pilgrimage (MDiv--Princeton, doctorate in New Testament and Judaism--Harvard). Thanks be to God for His grace and faithfulness!
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I do not see that they ate gifts for every believer in the passages provided. Also, the "greater gifts" seem to be pointing to gifts greater than tongues (which Paul indicates is gor the unbeliever) because they edify the congregation.

I am not opposed to "tongues", but in order to be biblical we cannot ignore Scripture (in the same passages you reference from Paul):

1 Corinthians 14:27–28 If anyone speaks in a tongue, it should be by two or at the most three, and each in turn, and one must interpret; but if there is no interpreter, he must keep silent in the church; and let him speak to himself and to God.

I am not Pentecostal. Do Pentecostals speak in tongues biblically when it comes to the congregation (one to two, with an interpreter)?
 
Upvote 0

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
John Caldwell: "I do not see that they ate gifts for every believer in the passages provided."

"Are all prophets (12:29)?
"You can ALL prophesy one by one (14:31)."
"I'd rather that you ALL prophesy (14:5b)."

"Do all speak in tongues (12:30)?"
"I want ALL of you speak in tongues (14:5a)."

Paul's comments after the quoted questions demonstrate that, at least in the case of prophecy and speaking in tongues, some gifts are intended for every believer.

John Caldwell: "Also, the "greater gifts" seem to be pointing to gifts greater than tongues (which Paul indicates is for the unbeliever) because they edify the congregation."

No, you must examine the context to see which gifts Paul deems "greater gifts." Only prophecy and speaking in tongues are discussed as "greater gifts, each equalling the other in "greatness" if the tongues are interpreted (14:5). Nothing is said about the relative greatness of the other listed gifts.

Commentaries on 1 Corinthians agree that tongues as a prayer language also edify the believer: "He who speaks in tongues builds up (edifies) himself (1 Cor. 14:4; cp. 14:28)." My last post illustrates how this is an understatement: my tongues experience at age 16 made my face shine in the dark and so transformed my mind that I soon received the highest academic average in my senior high school year! Also, it so edified me that, without that experience, I doubt a skeptic like I was back then would still be a Christian.

John Caldwell: "1 Corinthians 14:27–28 If anyone speaks in a tongue, it should be by two or at the most three, and each in turn, and one must interpret; but if there is no interpreter, he must keep silent in the church; But let him speak to himself and to God."

The academic book Commentariies on 1 Corinthians agree that the underlined text authorizes tongues as a private prayer language spoken at home and presumably in prayer groups where no outsiders who might be offended are present.

John Caldwell: "Do Pentecostals speak in tongues biblically when it comes to the congregation (one to two, with an interpreter)?"

Yes--at least in the large Pentecostal church of my youth.

I think you and others here have misunderstood Paul's identification of tongues as a sign for unbelievers, but I will save that explanation for a future post.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I agree Paul wished all had the gift of tongues and prophesy (even though Paul points out that all are not given the gift of prophesy). When we have a spiritual gift we typically wish it for others.

The greater gift, of course, is love.

I get praying in tongues. I was wondering about churches where people speak in tongues (in the congregation).

I have no problem with tongues (if one or two people speaking and the words being interpreted), just wondered how it was practiced.

Thank you for answering my question.

I disagree that 1 Corinthians 14:22 (So then tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophecy is for a sign, not to unbelievers but to those who believe) does not mean that tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers.

Not that unbelievers speak in tongues but that every time tongues occurs in Scripture it is a believer speaking as a sign for unbelievers (as occurring at Pentecost).
 
Upvote 0

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
No, Paul is clear that tongues is a sign for the unbeliever as opposed to prophesy being a sign to believers. This is also exactly how tongues operated in every example in Scripture.

That said, I understand those who advocate tongues as a higher gift for every believer (in opposition to Paul's words that prophesy is a better gift, and prophesy not even given to every believer) will reason away any passage to the contrary.

And that is fine. I do not prescribe how others worship. Christ can make them stand.

My opposition is not against tongues but against Christians who arrogantly ignore Scripture to judge that all Christians should seek the gift.
 
Upvote 0

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Mark 16:17–18 “These signs will accompany those who have believed: in My name they will cast out demons, they will speak with new tongues; they will pick up serpents, and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.

First, the statement is these signs will ACCOMPANY those who believe. I agree that it is those who believe that posses these gifts. But tongues for the unbeliever, not for those who believe.

In Scripture tongues were a testimony to the unbeliever. Look at Pentecost.

Second, these gifts (tongues, casting out demons, surviving picking up serpents and drinking poison, healing) accompanying believers doesn't mean that every believer speaks in tongues, casts out demons, picks up serpents and drinks poison, and heals the sick.

I think we have exhausted any fruitfulness here. You are looking to Scripture to support your position (and to advocate all practice as you believe) rather than looking to Scripture in order to form a belief.

My question was how tongues are practiced in Pentecostal churches as I have never been a member. You explained that one, or two at the most, speak in tongues and there is an interpreter. I appreciate the info.
 
Upvote 0

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
John Caldwell: "First, the statement is these signs will ACCOMPANY those who believe. I agree that it is those who believe that posses these gifts.

You ignore the fact that Jesus never says the "new tongues "sign" is a sign for the unbeliever!

John Caldwell: "But tongues for the unbeliever, not for those who believe."

You keep ducking 3 texts showing that tongues are spoken when no unbelievers are within earshot:
(1) No unbelievers are present when the Ephesian disciples speak in tongues (Acts 19:1-6).
(2) "He who speaks in tongues builds up (edifies) HIMSELF (1 Cor. 14:4)." That's "edifies himself," not 'edifies unbelievers!"
(3) "If there is no interpreter, let him keep silent in church and SPEAK [IN TONGUES] TO HIMSELF AND TO GOD (14:28)." Book commentaries on 1 Corinthians agree that 14:28 refers to the need to speak in uninterpreted tongues at home, that is, not when unbelievers are present to be offended.

John Caldwell: "In Scripture tongues were a testimony to the unbeliever."

You haven't bothered to read Isaiah 28:11-12 (quoted by Paul), which refutes your point about the sense in which tongues are a "sign for unbelievers." The Jews don't understand the uninterpreted "stammering lips" and "alien tongues" of the threatening Assyrians just as unbelieving visitors to the Corinthian church don't understand the uninterpreted gibberish spoken by believers there. Paul doesn't want tongues to be a "sign" to unbelievers in this sense; he wants them to understand and get saved!

John Caldwell: "Second, these gifts (tongues)...doesn't mean that every believer speaks in tongues..."

Paul would never say, "I want you all to speak in tongues (and prophesy-1 Cor. 14:5), if tongues and prophecy were not available to every believer. You keep ducking Paul's declaration, "You can ALL prophesy one by one (14:31)." The same applies to tongues.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Scripture says the sign on tongues is for the unbeliever. Jesus said that these signs (tongues, picking up serpents, dri king poison without dying, healing) will accompany believers.

This does not mean every Christian will pick up snakes, speak in tongues, heal, and drink poison.

God saying that tongues is a sign for the unbeliever while prophesying is a sign for believers does not contradict Christ's words that many signs accompany believers.

Tongues ate a sign for unbelievers, although individual Christians may pray in tongues. Why? Because tongues do not edify or profit the congregation. But they testify to the source of the interpreted words to the unbeliever.
 
Upvote 0

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
John Caldwell: "Scripture says the sign on tongues is for the unbeliever."
What you don't get is that uninterpreted incomprehensible tongues are the "sign" for unbelievers. That point is demonstrated by Paul's quote from Isaiah 28:11-12, where the Israelites don't understand the UNINTERPRETED "stammering lips" and "alien tongue" of the threatening Assyrians. Paul does not want this tongues "sign" in church because he wants tongues during worship to be interpreted and thus understood by outsiders. Why do you keep ducking that point?


John Calwell: "Tongues are a sign for unbelievers, although individual Christians may pray in tongues.

Again, what you don't get is that Christians are to pray in tongues privately (14:28) when no unbelievers are eavesdropping. Private prayer tongues "edify" the believer (14:4). So when God's Word teaches, "I want you ALL to speak in tongues (14:5)," this divine expectation can be applied to modern private prayer tongues.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
No, uninterpreted tongues is for Christians in private. The spirit may benefit but there is no edification.

Tongues is a sign for unbelievers as opposed to prophesy being a sign for believers. This was demonstrated at Pentecost. Unbelievers come to believe through tongues accompanied by interpretation (they testify to what is said).

You are taking bits and pieces of verses out of context to support what you already believe. That is not how Bible study works.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Berserk

Newbie
Oct 15, 2011
405
157
✟63,363.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
John Caldwell:
"No, uninterpreted tongues is for Christians in private. The spirit may benefit but there is no edification."

"He who speaks in uninterpreted tongues EDIFIES himself (1 Cor. 14:4)."

John Caldwell: "Tongues is a sign for unbelievers...This was demonstrated at Pentecost. Unbelievers come to believe through tongues accompanied by interpretation (they testify to what is said).

Tongues are never called "a sign" in Acts and we are discussing Paul's quotation of Isaiah 28:11-12 in 1 Cor. 14:21-22.

John Caldwell: "You are taking bits and pieces of verses out of context to support what you already believe."

On the contrary, it is you who are ignoring the CONTEXT of Paul's statement that tongues are "a sign for unbelievers." The context is Paul's quotation of Isaiah 28:11-12. To understand it, you need to recognize that biblical "signs" can be either "a sign for" or "a sign against" (a warning). In 28:11-12 Isaiah treats the "stammering lips" and "alien tongue" of the menacing Assyrians as a SIGN AGAINST sinful Israel in the sense that they don't understand this language which is not interpreted for them. for other OT examples of signs as signs against see The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible," vol. 4, p. 345. So Paul's point is that the uninterpreted tongues spoken in the Corinthian church are a "sign against" visiting unbelievers. If the tongues were interpreted, they would cease to be a "sign" (against), and so, visiting unbelievers would not be offended and might even get saved, as Paul wishes.
 
Upvote 0

ARBITER01

Legend
Aug 12, 2007
14,259
1,917
60
✟219,318.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
I am not Pentecostal. Do Pentecostals speak in tongues biblically when it comes to the congregation (one to two, with an interpreter)?

For those congregations that are still active with The Holy Spirit,... yes we do.

It is common in our church to see a speaking forth of tongues by The Holy Spirit, then an interpretation following by The Holy Spirit also.

This can happen up to 3 times in this form, but The Holy Spirit can introduce various ways to accomplish it. There can be a tongue with interpretation then an operation of the gift of prophesying then another tongues with interpretation, or there can be a singing in tongues with interpretation, etc. It just depends on what The Holy Spirit wishes to do at that given time.

I can at least speak for the Assemblies of GOD services,.... yes we follow scripture in this area since it is Holy Spirit directed, and He does not go against His word.
 
Reactions: John Caldwell
Upvote 0

ARBITER01

Legend
Aug 12, 2007
14,259
1,917
60
✟219,318.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
Tongues is a sign for unbelievers as opposed to prophesy being a sign for believers. This was demonstrated at Pentecost. Unbelievers come to believe through tongues accompanied by interpretation (they testify to what is said).

Interesting!

Most of the time denominations that are adamantly against the Spiritual gifts attempt to say that the tongues in acts 2 were different than what was taught over in Corinthians, thereby creating an unneeded argument. Scripture agrees with scripture, so what was taught over in Corinthians is applicable in Acts.

Acts 2 seen all the gifts poured out,.... so yes, the people were witnessing Holy Spirit inspired "speaking" in tongues with the following interpretation gift by the same Holy Spirit.
 
Reactions: John Caldwell
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.