Thats not entirely clear, but even if it was, paul was not the only elder in that church. He was only one of many men who could have performed that service.
That is your defense for Paul. Paul denied on his own!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Thats not entirely clear, but even if it was, paul was not the only elder in that church. He was only one of many men who could have performed that service.
Not all pharisees were against Christ either. One pharisee warned the others that they should have nothing to do with persecuting Christ, he reminded them that in time God would reveal the truth, just as He has done with all prophets before. JUst because a person is educated doesn't mean they are wrong. Pauls education later served to fight against the pharisees rejection of the Gospel, so God actually used Paul for good, after he converted him.
People twist CHrist's words as well, that doesnt mean much.
Paul claimed himself to be an apostle in return he favored his followers with the title 'saint'! People twist his verses or accept part of his verse to claim to be righteous in all respects. Paul cannot offer salvation, mind you!
Christ never baptized anyone, as you yourself said. You may want to watch what you say.
Sure. Twisting Paul's is much easy!
What has Paul done to spark such rage...??? He was the most inspirational "apostle" in NT. Most of the things that people wouldn't know what to do about them... He's the only one who seemed to address them.
Whoever chose him... Chose the 12 apostles. May the Lord make himself Known!!!
So Paul to be equated with Jesus then according to you? That is what Paul did when he asked people to imitate him! A great deviation!
Which one can you explain? Its my opinion that paul preaches the parable of the sower pretty well. HIs whole doctrine is teaching that parable.
That's not a contradiction. Jesus said if they dont accept you words then shake the dust of your feet and leave.
Logical fallacy. You cant use Pauls words to support your argument, if you dont agree with them in the first place.
No, just that your definition of hypocrite is reckless. Im done talking to you. Im tired of hearing your slander and crying. Have a good day.
Paul never said that he himself justified anyone. He actually said that Christ will judge us all, and that everyone will stand in judgment. You are the one twisting Pauls words. The use of the word saint isn't anything special. It simply refers to those who follow Christ and are justified by Christ. Paul points to Christ, just as the other apostles do as well.
Acts 9:32 Now as Peter was traveling through all those regions, he came down also to the saints who lived at Lydda.
Revelation 13:10If anyone is destined for captivity, to captivity he goes; if anyone kills with the sword, with the sword he must be killed Here is the perseverance and the faith of the saints.
Revelation 13:10 If anyone is destined for captivity, to captivity he goes; if anyone kills with the sword, with the sword he must be killed Here is the perseverance and the faith of the saints.
Jesus said his yoke was light and his burden easy to bear.
Protestants claim to be saints with their belief in Paul's candies!
Show me one place that I have ignored the teaching of Jesus. Otherwise, stop with the ad hominem and figure out how to engage in real debateIf you ignored the preaching of Jesus and believe in self-claim Paul, it would mean you can believe anything!
If you believe that Paul preached only one sentence, you need to seriously study his writings.Gospel is not one sentence. Tell who else, other than rank outsiders, called Paul an apostle?
There is no attitude of boasting. You are inserting that into the passage. Post scripture to back up your claims or you have nothing to stand on.Yes, the attitude of boasting as confessed by Paul himself played an important part in accosting the great apostle, Peter.
Again, you will need scriptural evidence. Without that, this is nothing more than an ad hominem against Paul. Just because you have not personally experienced interpretation of tongues doesn't mean that it wasn't/isn't a spiritual gift.Gift of interpretation was a lie Paul advocated to shut the mouth of people who were mocking at the Pentecostal phenomenon in notorious Corinth church!
People will dispute any part of the Bible they don't like. Bandwagon is not a valid argument.Even many Pauline epistles are disputed.
I thought the apostle Paul was a false prophet... why are you practically quoting him?You cannot blindly accept a self-proclamation of a rank outsider as scripture since it helps in speculations and to develop 'ear tickling' concepts!