Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Correct, and the quotes that are used to claim that Hitler was not a Christian tend to come from one questionable source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler's_Table_Talk
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Lots of evidence for that too:
“I believe today that I am acting in the sense of the Almighty
Creator. By warding off the Jews I am fighting for the Lord’s work.” (Adolph Hitler, Speech- Reichstag, 1936)
“I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of
the Almighty Creator.” (Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf. P46)
“I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so” (Adolph Hitler to General Gerhard Engel, 1941)
Even if evolution is completely false how does that make creationism true? creationism is a belief based on an old story as are all religions.
Is that why scientists think Hitler was a Christian?
With respect to your advice, or in spite of your advice?
Owned by Evolutionists, judged by Evolutionists, and if you dare insult or bring proof against their precious "Darwinian Evolution" dynasty there will be hell to pay and your funding will cease to exist.
How much longer do you think creationism will be tolerated in the US?
Yes, I have issues with someone who knows very little about the science of biology or the theory of evolution, but accuses all those scientists of lying and using unfair tactics to protect those lies. Do you believe that an uninformed accusation such as this is virtuous?
Who knows, but if too large a portion of the population believe in it, there will be repercussions. Science does not flourish in a theocratic society, and without science a society is going backwards.
Perhaps I shouldn't have matched her tone. Advice accepted.
However, bananas give me heartburn
Since you replied to my post, I take it that you mean I was using evolution as a monolithic term in that post. Please explain what you mean by "monolithic term" and point out the things that I wrote which lead you to the conclusion that I was using it in such a way. Here is my entire post reprinted below:I have issues with someone who uses "evolution" as a monolithic term when it's been shown over and over it's not.
True. Science will suffer because of the heavy bias against any view which doesn't include the Darwinist worldview, if it hasn't already.
Since you replied to my post, I take it that you mean I was using evolution as a monolithic term in that post. Please explain what you mean by "monolithic term" and point out the things that I wrote which lead you to the conclusion that I was using it in such a way. Here is my entire post reprinted below:
Yes, I have issues with someone who knows very little about the science of biology or the theory of evolution, but accuses all those scientists of lying and using unfair tactics to protect those lies. Do you believe that an uninformed accusation such as this is virtuous?
No, that is simply your error and poor reading comprehension on your part. If you can't understand what someone means by context then you should ask politely. Others can understand, don't blame others for your inability to understand a simple conversation.I have issues with someone who uses "evolution" as a monolithic term when it's been shown over and over it's not.
How has science suffered because of the theory of evolution?
Here is how it has thrived:
"Medical science is continually making rapid advances: new medications and treatments are developed and introduced at a rapid pace, but we can better take advantage of these advances by taking evolution into account.
Like all biological systems, both disease-causing organisms and their victims evolve. Understanding evolution can make a big difference in how we treat disease. The evolution of disease-causing organisms may outpace our ability to invent new treatments, but studying the evolution of drug resistance can help us slow it. Learning about the evolutionary origins of diseases may provide clues about how to treat them. And considering the basic processes of evolution can help us understand the roots of genetic diseases."
Source: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/medicine_01
You can click "Next" in the bottom right corner of the link if you care to learn why the understanding of evolution is important.
No, that is simply your error and poor reading comprehension on your part. If you can't understand what someone means by context then you should ask politely. Others can understand, don't blame others for your inability to understand a simple conversation.
We were kidding around trying to show how silly some of you evolutionist are...duh. However they ARE using pigs for transplants. Just sayin ;And I'll bet you don't really know why that is.
You also need to work on your knowledge of the classification system used by science for the living things on this planet.
How has science suffered because of the theory of evolution?
Here is how it has thrived:
"Medical science is continually making rapid advances: new medications and treatments are developed and introduced at a rapid pace, but we can better take advantage of these advances by taking evolution into account.
Like all biological systems, both disease-causing organisms and their victims evolve. Understanding evolution can make a big difference in how we treat disease. The evolution of disease-causing organisms may outpace our ability to invent new treatments, but studying the evolution of drug resistance can help us slow it. Learning about the evolutionary origins of diseases may provide clues about how to treat them. And considering the basic processes of evolution can help us understand the roots of genetic diseases."
Source: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/medicine_01
You can click "Next" in the bottom right corner of the link if you care to learn why the understanding of evolution is important.
or the view of evolution which makes certain guesses and suppositions concerning the process which produced all life we observe today.
You mean hypothesis' that are then tested (Scientific method)?
For example: "If evolution is true, then based on what we see in the fossil record we should find a transitional from fish to the earliest tetrapods. Based on what we know about evolution, this fossil should be roughly 360 million years old. Lets take out a geological map to see what rocks this age are exposed....oh there is an island in Canada. Time to test our hypothesis by searching for this fossil" They found it, confirming their hypothesis.
You can learn about this more here: http://tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/meetTik2.html
Scientists also test the hypothesis of common ancestry.
This is tested by looking in the fossil record, DNA, human genome.
The evidence here confirms the hypothesis. I don't think you understand the scientific method and how it's used. You twist the definition to support your world view. There aren't "Different" types of evolution. It's all evolution...you wrong about this and it's been pointed out to you on several occasions.
The "evolution' you quote I have no problem with, nor would any other Creationist. It is a true science, verifiable, testable and believable. I take issues when you take that GOOD science and "extrapolate" it over "millions and millions of years" and say that time takes care of the problems we have.
There seem to be two types of evolution for you. There is the evolution that you will admit exists, the ToE as used by medical researchers and as observed in speciation. And the ToE that you do not want to admit is real. Sorry, but it is all the same "evolution".Point out what part I misunderstand.
Why is evolution in quotations?
It seems you are okay with the idea of microevolution when it benefits you (Vaccinations) but you can't wrap your mind around macroevolution.....which is simply the results of microevolution over millions and millions of years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?