Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That children are initially already in the right place, so that if a child dies at 6 days or 6 years, even not knowing anything of the gospel, they will be in eternal life. Next, that we adults must change and become like them, humble and willing to listen and trust in God.Be sure to keep all that in context with mindfulness of the specific point Jesus was making in that context.
Partly: I believe there is something good about us after all, we ARE God's creation and that in itself is worth saying "it is good".A lot of the debate about salvation, justification, faith, and good works comes back to this question. Everyone knows that people have a sin problem, but how far down does it go? How badly has sin affected the human race? The traditional responses have been...
What do you say?
- Totally Messed Up - This was the view of Augustine contra Pelagius. Pelagius taught that sin was not an inherited condition of mankind, but a personal choice. Everyone was born neutral with the freedom to choose either good or evil. Everyone had the natural, God-given ability to be good. Therefore, salvation came as a result of our own efforts to be good. Contrary to this, Augustine taught that sin has totally messed people up and apart from God's grace there is no hope for salvation. Calvin followed Augustine and taught that God must regenerate a person in order for them to respond to him.
- Partly Messed Up - The Old Catholic church initially adopted Augustine's view but later drifted into a form of semi-Pelagianism. The Roman Catholic church's position today is that sin has sort of messed up people, but not completely. All people have the ability to respond to God and so salvation is a result of God's grace, but also man's spontaneous response. God and man work together for a person to be saved. This also has become the Arminian view.
- Not Messed Up - This is the view of Pelagius (as described above) and many liberal Christians today. There is no original sin and sin is not an inherited condition. It's perfectly normal for humans to be imperfect and God does not expect perfection from us (liberal Christianity). OR God does demand that we be good and we do have this power within us. Therefore we are saved through tapping into our own inner goodness and being the people we know we can be (Pelagius and also some liberals).
Adam and Eve were made by God "very good", which I assume by God's standard the would be as good as they could be made.How can you know this if people are not born with a sinful condition?
No it is not. "because all have sinned" and did not say "because Adam sinned".I don't know where you got these strange ideas from. The Bible teaches that all in Adam will die and that all were made sinners in Adam. Only those who are in Christ will be made alive and live because of him. All of this is in Romans 5.
Humans are not animals.I am not talking about material world as such (sun, moon, trees, mountains...), but specifically about our animal bodies.
Our body fights against spirit.
I don't think Tokien's words are inconsistent with the first option. One can be totally messed up and yet not as messed up as possible.
That children are initially already in the right place, so that if a child dies at 6 days or 6 years, even not knowing anything of the gospel, they will be in eternal life. Next, that we adults must change and become like them, humble and willing to listen and trust in God.
By that, do you mean God forces you not to sin?
Well, then its possible to renconcile the first position and the Catholic one.
I’m not a fan of Augustine. He treated children in his care quite harshly, and his asinine “error has no rights” argument was part of the logic that led to the first executions of “heretics” by the Church in the late 300s. Any Christian who has worked his logic to the point where he believes he has the Mandate of Heaven to kill people has left the Reservation of my friends, and I dismiss him from the range of thinkers I’m willing to allow to speak in my court. When Christians behave like Muslims, I vote them off the island.I agree. The Old Catholic view (Augustine's view) used to dominate in the Catholic church. It wasn't until the Medieval era that Rome departed from this view.
The 2 passages, thus the 2 points. (The more legal stuff about children being innocent one could suss out from Paul though if one wanted, in Romans 2, 4, 5. But now a days I think of it more in terms of God will show consideration/mercy to children also, in view of such decisive things (to me) as from Malachi (via Luke 1) for instance, and even Deuteronomy) Sounds like we pretty much agree, though we use somewhat different ways of talking.You've actually stated two separate things, unless you're agreeing with what I said earlier.
I said that children are under the grace God grants to ignorance, not that children are inherently excused of the sin generated by Adam and Eve. As they grow older, that ignorance fades and becomes less excusable, until at some point they've seen enough God in creation that they no longer have the excuse of ignorance (Romans 1).
But that is a difference issue from the other characteristic of young children, which is to trust their parents and to follow their parents without intellectual consent to the direction and destination. That is the point Jesus was illustrating with His discussion of children, which has nothing to do with an assertion of innocence from Adam's sin.
There are adults with that characteristic, too--those who have adapted to the military way of life described by the centurion whose servant Jesus healed.
No, I think we get the new heart post Christ. I think prior to a relationship with Christ the Holy Spirit acts exactly how it does in the OT. It can rest on someone to draw them in but it can’t fully enter. We are totally messed up. Totally totally. We want to be God so bad it’s insane. In our sin nature that is. In Christ we know that we must be last and must lose ourselves. Only then can we be first, but the goal is not to be first. The goal is ChristI agree! Does this suggest that we are in need of Christ to give us a new heart before we are able to respond to him?
No. I mean that God has liberated me from sin so that I no longer have to obey it. If I sin, it's because I choose to degrade myself. I don't have to sin anymore.
Humans are not animals.
Whatsoever.
Semi pelagianiasm and Arminianism are not synonymous.I’m of the opinion that semi pelagianism and Arminianism stem from pelagianism
"But when Jesus saw it, he was indignant and said to them, “Let the children come to me; do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of God."The 2 passages, thus the 2 points. (The more legal stuff about children being innocent one could suss out from Paul though if one wanted, in Romans 2, 4, 5. But now a days I think of it more in terms of God will show consideration/mercy to children also, in view of such decisive things (to me) as from Malachi (via Luke 1) for instance, and even Deuteronomy) Sounds like we pretty much agree, though we use somewhat different ways of talking.
But human beings are not capable for God's righteousness, which is only given by God's grace in Christ, which we access only by faith in His name.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?