Nathan Poe
Well-Known Member
I think of you as entertainment -- no answer I could possibly give regarding the flood could change that.
cooperate with what?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Fair enough --- if that's your best answer --- continue thinking about me the way you do.
I can't help that.
At least I co-operate.
At least I'm good for something, eh?I think of you as entertainment...
Your good for a lot. you have humor, you inspire discussion, you often cause me to google something that's new to me, you can be frustrating as all heck, and certainly entertaining.At least I'm good for something, eh?
Your good for a lot. you have humor, you inspire discussion, you often cause me to google something that's new to me, you can be frustrating as all heck, and certainly entertaining.
.
Haha. No, you interpreted that question fine. But whenever "newbies" come around and tell you what you're doing wrong, you seem to think they mean to say that they've analyzed all half million of your posts, when that's not at all what they mean.Point out the words I'm "spectacularly misinterpreting" in this conversation, which supposedly is an example of what you're talking about:Q: Where is evidence of the Flood?I usually get accused of giving an "ad hoc" answer to that question (even though it should be "ad lib", not "ad hoc").
A: God removed it.
But anyway, I get accused of giving an ad hoc answer to that question.
How would you answer it?
Point out the words I'm "spectacularly misinterpreting" in this conversation, which supposedly is an example of what you're talking about:
Q: Where is evidence of the Flood?I usually get accused of giving an "ad hoc" answer to that question (even though it should be "ad lib", not "ad hoc").
A: God removed it.
But anyway, I get accused of giving an ad hoc answer to that question.
How would you answer it?
As I understand it, protons carry a positive charge; and just like two positive magnets, they will repel each other.That must have been a greater miracle than the resurrection of Jesus then.
If God can give attention to every single sub-atomic particle in this universe, what makes you think it is so inconceivable that He orchestrated a clean-up after the Flood --- right down to the atomic level --- so that no trace --- and I mean no trace --- was left?
Documenting an event without documenting the complete removal of said event's traces still amounts to deception.As I understand it, protons carry a positive charge; and just like two positive magnets, they will repel each other.
Now imagine a whole slew of protons forced to exist within the nucleus of an atom --- all trying to repel and get away from each other.
What is holding them together? The Strong Nuclear Force is.
From Hydrogen to [I think] Lead, the SNF has no problem doing its job. In Lead, the SNF is exactly the same strength as the force pushing them apart.
But above Lead on the Periodic Table, and the repelling force is stronger than the SNF, and the atom becomes [I believe the term is] unstable; and the more protons, the more unstable (?) the atom becomes.
(Someone please correct me here if I'm wrong.)
According to Peter, on the "Day of God", God is going to suspend the SNF, and every single proton in existence is going to go flying away from each other.
God is then going to take every single sub-atomic particle in existence and put them back together into a New Heaven and a New Earth.
Now --- why did I say all of this?
If God can give attention to every single sub-atomic particle in this universe, what makes you think it is so inconceivable that He orchestrated a clean-up after the Flood --- right down to the atomic level --- so that no trace --- and I mean no trace --- was left?
Then documented the Flood, so people wouldn't "be deceived" as others call it, when they look underground and see a "different story".
Why?Documenting an event without documenting the complete removal of said event's traces still amounts to deception.
As I understand it, protons carry a positive charge; and just like two positive magnets, they will repel each other.
Now imagine a whole slew of protons forced to exist within the nucleus of an atom --- all trying to repel and get away from each other.
What is holding them together? The Strong Nuclear Force is.
From Hydrogen to [I think] Lead, the SNF has no problem doing its job. In Lead, the SNF is exactly the same strength as the force pushing them apart.
But above Lead on the Periodic Table, and the repelling force is stronger than the SNF, and the atom becomes [I believe the term is] unstable; and the more protons, the more unstable (?) the atom becomes.
(Someone please correct me here if I'm wrong.)
According to Peter, on the "Day of God", God is going to suspend the SNF, and every single proton in existence is going to go flying away from each other.
God is then going to take every single sub-atomic particle in existence and put them back together into a New Heaven and a New Earth.
Now --- why did I say all of this?
If God can give attention to every single sub-atomic particle in this universe, what makes you think it is so inconceivable that He orchestrated a clean-up after the Flood --- right down to the atomic level --- so that no trace --- and I mean no trace --- was left?
Then documented the Flood, so people wouldn't "be deceived" as others call it, when they look underground and see a "different story".
The very fact that you must create an image of God as a deceiver in order to make your belief valid tells me that you are wrong.If God can give attention to every single sub-atomic particle in this universe, what makes you think it is so inconceivable that He orchestrated a clean-up after the Flood --- right down to the atomic level --- so that no trace --- and I mean no trace --- was left?
Then documented the Flood, so people wouldn't "be deceived" as others call it, when they look underground and see a "different story".
It is. And AV has posted a LOT in that thread.And by the way- there are THREADS that you can post in to increase REPUTATION which is what I think she was referring to.
Because your painting an image of God as hiding the truth about His Own Creation. Now why would God be disdonest? I don't believe He would. Infact, I don't believe that God can be dishonest. I think the problem sits with the ancient middle-eastern myths within scriptures itself.Why?
God reveals Himself to us in two ways:God has permitted that the fossil and geological records be found that indicate millions of years and evolution. So we can't be faithful to God's commands and simultaniously deny hard evidences before us.
If my reputation or post count or breathing bothers anyone, I can't help that.And by the way- there are THREADS that you can post in to increase REPUTATION which is what I think she was referring to.
What thread are you referring to?It is. And AV has posted a LOT in that thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?