There are what are actually quite small numbers, but made to seem like a lot with all the hot air, making claims of this or that thing based on what one person or another thinks they saw and their interpretation of it. Contrary to all the nonsense out there the claims have been looked at in detail, Trump's legal team have taken anything remotely seeming like there might be something to it before judges for review but there is quite literally nothing to it. The rewards put out for anything at all are pretty huge and teams of Trump supporters, including some people highly placed in govt, have taken time off work to badger people about who they voted for from dawn til dusk, and they have turned up nothing.
Don't let yourself be impressed by fancy sounding claims; you say it's the govt's responsibility to fix a problem that doesn't actually exist, I say it's the responsibility of individuals to avail themselves of all of the freely available information and make sound judgements. There are objective, quantifiable differences between the irresponsible ranting of papers like the Federalist, and Fox news style selective reporting, and sources that actually analyse data carefully. It's up to individuals to understand what those differences are and keep themselves informed.
