How is this science?

[AlHailThePowerOfJesusName]

Ad hom. You are substituting "it isn't science" for refuting their evidence. RAWR

 

[sfs]

Ad hom. You are substituting "it isn't science" for refuting their evidence. RAWR

There are two different points. 1) They have no evidence, and 2) they are not doing science.

 

[MoonLancer]

Ad hom. You are substituting "it isn't science" for refuting their evidence. RAWR

and i point you back to the post where someone said this is akin to making a church of Christ with specific doctrine that says he doesn't exist.

That's what this science fair is.

 

[juvenissun]

Answers in Genesis is hosting a science fair, but it's science in name only. Look at these rules.

1. Scripture teaches a recent origin for man and the whole creation.
2. The days in Genesis do not correspond to geologic ages, but are six [6] consecutive twenty-four [24] hour days of Creation.
3. The Noachian Flood was a significant geological event and much (but not all) fossiliferous sediment originated at that time.
4. The 'gap' theory has no basis in Scripture.
5. The view, commonly used to evade the implications or the authority of Biblical teaching, that knowledge and/or truth may be divided into 'secular' and 'religious', is rejected.
6. By definition, no apparent, perceived, or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record. Of primary importance is the fact that evidence is always subject to interpretation by fallible people who do not possess all information.

And people wonder why no one takes creationists seriously.

Are you a science major?
Are you ready to make a scientific argument?
If negative on both, then I won't waste my time on you.

 

[TerranceL]

Are you a science major?
Are you ready to make a scientific argument?
If negative on both, then I won't waste my time on you.

Given your incredible lack of scientific knowledge why do you care?

 

[Gishin]

Are you a science major?
Are you ready to make a scientific argument?
If negative on both, then I won't waste my time on you.

What's funny is I don't need to be a scientist to know what science is, and more importantly, what it is not.