• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How Important Is Docterine When Finding a Mate?

Llauralin

Senior Veteran
Mar 23, 2005
2,341
157
38
Prizren, Kosova
✟18,331.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Explain to me your "communion" process for one please. And since you attend one-and have spoken in detail about the "process" I'll let you explain.

How does your confession process work? How does your churches communion/sacrament process work? Just starters I guess.
(not explaining Lutheran views on sacraments, but...) What is your "communion process"? Does it involve grape juice, little plastic cups, and crackers? Or something else?

I suppose (ruling out Tradition) the biblical thing to do would be fresh flat bread and wine, drunk from a common cup, possibly followed by a meal. Wait, isn't that what traditional Lutherans do?

I was at a "Bible church" once, for a youth outing. They didn't have the little plastic cups, so instead they handed out little cups and sent around a loaf of bread and a jug of grape juice. Really? I could so totally not see Jesus doing anything like that!
 
Upvote 0

CoachR64

Awesome, with a side order of amazing
Jul 2, 2007
7,292
673
46
Oklahoma City, OK
✟33,477.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I have no problem with people looking for others that have similar beliefs... For example, I was dating a girl (just for a short period of time) when she went off on a rant one day about how she would never allow a firearm in her house, no exceptions, no compromise, etc... She said anyone she married would have to sell their guns or she wouldn't marry them.... I still love that girl to death as a friend, but we didn't date after that.

I just think when it comes to doctrine, anything non-essential to salvation is just extra. It is just a way for people to worship and grow in Christ in their own way. I have different opinions and views on things from my parents, but we get along just fine. How someone worships Christ is totally personal. Some people feel closer to Christ through rules/traditions/etc... and that is fine.

My problem comes when people force those beliefs down the throats of others and look down on those as others as liars, heretics, stupid, etc.... And it happens a lot within many denominations.

Coach
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rosalila
Upvote 0

lostaquarium

Quite flawed
Dec 23, 2008
3,105
394
London
✟27,572.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Kirk - I'm still unclear by what "being in communion" means. What are the practical consequences? Apart from marriage. I'd like to know how differently you'd treat athiests, vs Lutherians, vs other saved Christians.

If I think you are in sin, do I want to declare full communion with you? (As to say that we are completly spiritually united?) No because if I say I'm completly united with you and your church then I am endorsing your bad practice.
But everyone is in sin, whether they believe in the right doctorines or not. Would you be in communion with a professing Lutherian who attends your church but sees nothing wrong with lying regularly?
How about with a newly-converted Lutherian who hasn't yet gotten to grips with all the Lutherian doctrines?

Well let me ask you a question. Does God approve of homosexual acts?
No
Most conservative Christians would say no and I would agree.
Are those who belive that homosexual acts are ok unsaved? No I don't think so.
No, me neither :)
Does that mean that it doesn't matter???? DEFINATLY NOT
It does matter for certain things, e.g. the teaching/misleading of others.
It doesn't matter for my relationship with that person. Even if I know a gay man who truly believes the Bible, yet he's still a practicing homosexual because he honestly doesn't think it's wrong - I'd treat him primarily as a brother and friend. Maybe I'd try to explain to him why he's doing wrong, if it would be constructive. But I'd feel as spiritually close to him as I would to any other member of the church.

Every mistake in doctrine is not living up to the standard God wants from us. Every bad practice we do (Such as how we might understand and use baptism) is not living up to God's standard.
But so is every sin! Every lie or angry thought! The purpose of Christ's coming is that we cannot hope to life up to God's standard. We can only try as hard as we can. If someone has searched her heart and the scriptures, thought long and hard, prayed, and come to a different set of doctrines than you - she has done her best, and I don't believe God would be offended by that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rosalila
Upvote 0

Llauralin

Senior Veteran
Mar 23, 2005
2,341
157
38
Prizren, Kosova
✟18,331.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Being in communion means being completely unified as a single ecclesia. If I go to a church that I'm in communion with (pretty much any Orthodox church) I can partake of their sacraments, and be a full member of their church without having to renounce any of the teachings of my former parish, or accept anything new that was not simply a matter of imperfect understanding on my part. When parishes within that communion have a substantial difference on matters of faith or praxis (Tradition, not tradition, which can differ), they break communion. Thus, the Orthodox and the Copts are not in communion, despite a number of things we hold in common, because we broks communion at the (IIRC) 4th Ecumenical Council, and have yet to reunite. That doesn't mean they're not Christian. It doesn't mean we believe they're wrong about everything, or most things, or that they're necessarily worse Christians. We can't even say with any certainty that their sacraments aren't true (they probably are) - it does mean that we have a barrier between our church and theirs that prevents full unity, and thus sharing sacraments in each other's churches.

Does that make sense?
 
Upvote 0

Mrs. Luther073082

Commit to the LORD whatever you do - Proverbs 16:3
Jan 18, 2006
19,783
1,418
✟49,336.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Kirk - I'm still unclear by what "being in communion" means.

I know this was not directed at me, but this gives pretty easy to understand description of it...

Communion - What is Christian Communion?

What are the practical consequences? Apart from marriage.

BibleGateway.com - PassageLookup: 1 Corinthians 11:27-29;

1 Corinthians 11:27-29 (New International Version)


27Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. 28A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the cup. 29For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself.




But everyone is in sin, whether they believe in the right doctorines or not. Would you be in communion with a professing Lutherian who attends your church but sees nothing wrong with lying regularly?

The issue he has is that he does not want to take communion in a church that "eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner". Why is that an issue? See the Bible verse above.

Other people's sins like lying and such are kind of a moot point in regards to taking communion with them, because those sins are those individual people's problem. Taking communion with someone who believes lying is OK does not make you guilty of being a liar or believing that lying is OK and it does not change what you're doing in communion. But taking communion in a church that "eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner" does make you "guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord". Hopefully I explained that clearly.

It does matter for certain things, e.g. the teaching/misleading of others. It doesn't matter for my relationship with that person. Even if I know a gay man who truly believes the Bible, yet he's still a practicing homosexual because he honestly doesn't think it's wrong - I'd treat him primarily as a brother and friend. Maybe I'd try to explain to him why he's doing wrong, if it would be constructive. But I'd feel as spiritually close to him as I would to any other member of the church.

And so would we. But we wouldn't go to a church that has a practicing homosexual pastor that thinks and claims there is nothing wrong with what he is doing.

But so is every sin! Every lie or angry thought! The purpose of Christ's coming is that we cannot hope to life up to God's standard. We can only try as hard as we can. If someone has searched her heart and the scriptures, thought long and hard, prayed, and come to a different set of doctrines than you - she has done her best, and I don't believe God would be offended by that.

This is not about other people. Kirk is very kind to and a friend to all sorts of people with all sorts of beliefs*. What this is about is that he is trying his hardest not to do what he thinks is a sin. In regards to communion, if he were to take it with a church that doesn't have the same beliefs, that would be knowingly eating the bread and drinking the cup of the Lord in what he believes to be an unworthy manner and a sin.

*I'm sure some people on here would disagree because Kirk advocates his beliefs but you know what, it is no different than other people advocating their beliefs about other topics like premarital sex, homosexuality, etc. Just like you said earlier in your post, if you had a friend who was a homosexual you would try to explain to him what you think he's doing wrong. It is no different than that. And Kirk saying he believes 100% he is right about communion is no different than people saying they believe 100% they are right about premarital sex or homosexuality or whatever else.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Mrs. Luther073082

Commit to the LORD whatever you do - Proverbs 16:3
Jan 18, 2006
19,783
1,418
✟49,336.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
It is different when he comes on here calling them heretics and liars and treating them like they are stupid for what they believe.

Coach

I'm not sure what that has to do with this thread, but I believe Kirk already responded to you with this...

First of all I don't do that kind of name calling. I call specific doctrines heresy thats true. But calling a doctrine heresy is different from calling someone a heretic.

Calling premarital sex fornication is different from calling the woman who did it, a ho or a [wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth].

Calling homosexual acts detestable is not the same as calling a person who is gay to be detestable.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

CoachR64

Awesome, with a side order of amazing
Jul 2, 2007
7,292
673
46
Oklahoma City, OK
✟33,477.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So if I call everything you believe in heresy, that is not calling you a heretic? Semantics don't change what he calls people. If I call everything you say/believe "lies" than I am calling you a liar.

When it comes to beliefs non-essential to salvation, we need to learn to respect each other versus looking down on them and treating them as idiots for not believing the same as us.

Everyone knows I am a very big supporter of the people's right to keep and bear arms. I will not waiver from that. At the same time, I respect the right of others to not want to keep and bear arms. What I do not respect is trying to take away my rights to do so.

A little respect, from both sides, can go a long ways in any discussion or debate.

Coach
 
Upvote 0

Luther073082

κύριε ἐλέησον χριστὲ ἐλέησον
Apr 1, 2007
19,202
840
43
New Carlisle, IN
✟46,326.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Kirk - I'm still unclear by what "being in communion" means. What are the practical consequences? Apart from marriage. I'd like to know how differently you'd treat athiests, vs Lutherians, vs other saved Christians.

Atheists - let me change this to a muslim to make it easier to understand.

For a muslim, we would not let them say a prayer or pray with them in any way they belive in a different God. We certainly wouldn't give them communion.

Other Christians we would pray with but not commune with them. We would not let them preach in our church either.

Other Lutherans we would typically commune and pray. However there are excpetions. Non-confessional Lutheranism reaches such a broad amount of people. For example my church is technically non-confessional, yet in many confessional Lutheran churchs I'm allowed to commune, because after speaking with the pastor he belives that I am at one with him and the church on faith and doctrine.

However there are many far more liberal non-confessional Lutherans that the very same pastor might not commune.

Also there are some confessional Lutherans I would prefer not commune. (Although they wouldn't want to commune with us anyways.) A small few confessional Lutherans while they confess "One holy catholic and apostolic church" they do not practice it as they refuse to pray with other Christians. I reject divisions to such and extent because it in practice rejects the idea of one holy catholic and apostolic church"

But everyone is in sin, whether they believe in the right doctorines or not. Would you be in communion with a professing Lutherian who attends your church but sees nothing wrong with lying regularly?

Its impossible to know what everyone belives. However the church doctrine is clear. It is his sin if he communes and does not accept our doctrine that lying is not ok. However if we know he belives this we won't give him communion because it would be harmful to him.

How about with a newly-converted Lutherian who hasn't yet gotten to grips with all the Lutherian doctrines?

Basic Lutheran doctrines should be learned in a catechism class of some sort before Lutherans are communed IMO. Some Lutherans might disagree with me on this. But in order to commune a person should have some training in what communion is, as well as the basic tenents of the Christian faith and the Lutheran tradition.


It does matter for certain things, e.g. the teaching/misleading of others.
It doesn't matter for my relationship with that person.

Thats the same with us. We arn't going to stop loving people just because they are of a different doctrine.

Even if I know a gay man who truly believes the Bible, yet he's still a practicing homosexual because he honestly doesn't think it's wrong - I'd treat him primarily as a brother and friend. Maybe I'd try to explain to him why he's doing wrong, if it would be constructive. But I'd feel as spiritually close to him as I would to any other member of the church.

But see thats the difference, there are different levels of spiritual closeness. Communion litterally says that we are one together in this church. However said homosexual is to be loved and accepted as a child of God. BUT his doctrine is false and therefore he can not receive communion, because he is not at one with us in doctrine.

However if said homosexual realizes that homosexual activity is sin and agrees with us on all other major points of doctrine, he can receive communion with the rest of us. Because he is at one with us spritually in faith and doctrine.

But so is every sin! Every lie or angry thought! The purpose of Christ's coming is that we cannot hope to life up to God's standard. We can only try as hard as we can. If someone has searched her heart and the scriptures, thought long and hard, prayed, and come to a different set of doctrines than you - she has done her best, and I don't believe God would be offended by that.

God is offended by every sin hon. Just because we all sin and we do it a lot doesn't mean God isn't offended by it.

So we avoid sin as much as we can. We try to avoid lying or being angry with people. We keep a check on our temper. In just the same way we try to get doctrine right in every sense of the word.

Getting doctrine wrong is a sin, just like lying is a sin. Just because all of us have lied doesn't mean its totally cool to just accept false doctrines.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Luther073082

κύριε ἐλέησον χριστὲ ἐλέησον
Apr 1, 2007
19,202
840
43
New Carlisle, IN
✟46,326.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So if I call everything you believe in heresy, that is not calling you a heretic? Semantics don't change what he calls people. If I call everything you say/believe "lies" than I am calling you a liar.

When it comes to beliefs non-essential to salvation, we need to learn to respect each other versus looking down on them and treating them as idiots for not believing the same as us.

Everyone knows I am a very big supporter of the people's right to keep and bear arms. I will not waiver from that. At the same time, I respect the right of others to not want to keep and bear arms. What I do not respect is trying to take away my rights to do so.

A little respect, from both sides, can go a long ways in any discussion or debate.

Coach


I don't belive I called you any names for not believing in the same doctrines as I do.

And if you belive everything I belive is a heresy you wouldn't be Christian. :D

But also beliving in heresy and being a heretic are two animals. A heretic is a name for a person thats based on the sin of heresy. It would be like calling a woman who sleeps around a [wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth].

Its the same for calling someone a liar. If I say "You are lying to me" I am talking about specific instance. Calling you a liar is defining you by the sin of lying.

In which case we are all tempermental liars who are perverts.

We have all gotten angry
We have all lied
And we have all lusted

What I'm trying to tell you is the sin of heresy does not define a person as a heretic.
 
Upvote 0

CoachR64

Awesome, with a side order of amazing
Jul 2, 2007
7,292
673
46
Oklahoma City, OK
✟33,477.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I disagree.... you commit one sin, you are a sinner. You tell a lie, you are a liar.

There is no degree "wel, you are a sinner after you commit 43 sins." Doesn't happen that way. If I break the law, I am a law breaker, a criminal. Even if I break one law.

So when you start calling people's beliefs heresy, you are calling them heretics and no amount of twisting semantics will change that.

Coach
 
Upvote 0

Llauralin

Senior Veteran
Mar 23, 2005
2,341
157
38
Prizren, Kosova
✟18,331.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I disagree.... you commit one sin, you are a sinner. You tell a lie, you are a liar.

There is no degree "wel, you are a sinner after you commit 43 sins." Doesn't happen that way. If I break the law, I am a law breaker, a criminal. Even if I break one law.

So when you start calling people's beliefs heresy, you are calling them heretics and no amount of twisting semantics will change that.

Coach
Would it (hypothetically) be more helpful to call you a schismatic? Meaning that you don't necessarily believe wrongly on matters pertaining to salvation, but there's a fundamental divide between your church and (I was about to say the Church, but for the sake of being hypothetical) other churches that are not in communion with yours?
 
Upvote 0

CoachR64

Awesome, with a side order of amazing
Jul 2, 2007
7,292
673
46
Oklahoma City, OK
✟33,477.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Actually, no, I am forgiven by the grace of God. And that is how we should view all our brothers and sisters in Christ... not as stupid heretics for not believing exactly as you do in things non essential to salvation

Coach
 
Upvote 0

Luther073082

κύριε ἐλέησον χριστὲ ἐλέησον
Apr 1, 2007
19,202
840
43
New Carlisle, IN
✟46,326.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I want to point out two things.

If you can move past some of the "orthodox language" this explains it well.

Being in communion means being completely unified as a single ecclesia. If I go to a church that I'm in communion with (pretty much any Orthodox church) I can partake of their sacraments, and be a full member of their church without having to renounce any of the teachings of my former parish, or accept anything new that was not simply a matter of imperfect understanding on my part. When parishes within that communion have a substantial difference on matters of faith or praxis (Tradition, not tradition, which can differ), they break communion. Thus, the Orthodox and the Copts are not in communion, despite a number of things we hold in common, because we broks communion at the (IIRC) 4th Ecumenical Council, and have yet to reunite. That doesn't mean they're not Christian. It doesn't mean we believe they're wrong about everything, or most things, or that they're necessarily worse Christians. We can't even say with any certainty that their sacraments aren't true (they probably are) - it does mean that we have a barrier between our church and theirs that prevents full unity, and thus sharing sacraments in each other's churches.

Also here is what the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod has to say about it.

Since apostolic times visible Christendom has been divided. Although there are historical, cultural, and sociological factors that have contributed to such division, departure from God's truth revealed to us in the Holy Scriptures must be regarded as the principal cause for such division. The apostles themselves foresaw and had to deal with such division within early Christian communities (see, for example, Acts 20:25-31). While the Scriptures are the inerrant source and norm of all doctrine and while God's Truth is one, sinful human beings can and do err. Hence, division occurs in visible Christendom.
The same can be said for modern denominationalism. While there are historical, cultural and sociological factors involved in the formation of denominations, disagreement regarding the understanding and application of biblical doctrine remains the fundamental reason for division between and among them. We hold that there can be only one Truth, and that denominations exist because some Christians have departed from what is faithful to biblical doctrine. In spite of the divided state of Christendom, we in The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod remain committed to the quest for external unity in the church based on agreement in doctrine. We believe that this is not an option, but is God's will.

IE - Church Unity can only happen based upon agreement on doctrine.

And that is how we should view all our brothers and sisters in Christ... not as stupid heretics for not believing exactly as you do in things non essential to salvation

I disagree

Essential to salvation or not we should not accept false doctrine uncorrected.

The little things taht arn't essential to salvation are still sins, they still offend God. God's standard is perfection. ABSOLUTE PERFECTION IN EVERY WAY SHAPE AND FORM. WHEN YOU FAIL TO BE PERFECT, YOU HAVE SINNED.

And its comprimise on those little things that leads to comprimise on the big things that are essential to salvation.

The JW's exist and recruit because people don't think doctrine is important.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

CoachR64

Awesome, with a side order of amazing
Jul 2, 2007
7,292
673
46
Oklahoma City, OK
✟33,477.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Not at all llauralin. I simply believe the Bible is the true Word of God and that couple with the Holy Spirit Christ gave us is all we need.

Paul told us that some things will be sin and struggles for some, and not for others. If alcohol is a stumbling block for one person, then it would be sinful for them to endulge in it and let it become a master in their life. For others, a drink of wine with dinner would be perfectly fine.

The things non-essential to salvation in the Bible are simply ways for someone ro fellowship and relationship with Christ. Not all people are called to worship in the same way. Some are teachers, some are leaders, some are workers, some have the gift of song, others have the gift of counseling, etc....

I just think everyone's walk with Christ is their own personal journey and relationship and because it may not be the same as yours or mine does not make it wrong, heretical, stupid, etc....

Coach
 
Upvote 0

Llauralin

Senior Veteran
Mar 23, 2005
2,341
157
38
Prizren, Kosova
✟18,331.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I wonder if there's a communication problem? In hierarchical churches there's a technical definition of heresy. When I was Evangelical, though, there was more of a feeling about heresy - to call something heresy meant something kind of like that it was shockingly wrong, possibly to the point that it might effect salvation. Luther is using a technical meaning of heresy based upon confessional Lutheranism.

Coach, I'm not certain you've been clear on what you understand heresy to mean. Could you explain, please?
 
Upvote 0

CoachR64

Awesome, with a side order of amazing
Jul 2, 2007
7,292
673
46
Oklahoma City, OK
✟33,477.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Luther, the Bible disagrees... a day will come and has already come when we will not worship in churches and temples, but in spirit and in truth. We don't need a man made interpretation of the Bible to worship God. The catechism is nothing more than man's thoughts and personal interpretations on what the Bible says. God gave us the Holy Spirit for that purpose, not Martin Luther.

Coach
 
Upvote 0

hockeysistah12

Regular Member
Jun 19, 2004
423
30
66
Bellflower,Ca
Visit site
✟23,233.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
I can see Kirk's concern because as a Christian I will not date those who are in cults, some which are of the guise of the Christian church because they twist scripture. This is why I don't join dating services like e-harmony because even though you put your faith as "Christian" you may be getting someone from the Mormon Church, for example.
 
Upvote 0

Luther073082

κύριε ἐλέησον χριστὲ ἐλέησον
Apr 1, 2007
19,202
840
43
New Carlisle, IN
✟46,326.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Luther, the Bible disagrees... a day will come and has already come when we will not worship in churches and temples, but in spirit and in truth. We don't need a man made interpretation of the Bible to worship God. The catechism is nothing more than man's thoughts and personal interpretations on what the Bible says. God gave us the Holy Spirit for that purpose, not Martin Luther.

Coach

God gave us both. The Holy spirit drives my personal faith, not Martin Luther.

However God gave us Luther (not as though he's equal to the holy spirit but he was a gift to the church) because he was a brilliant man who helped change the church and helped us to understand biblical doctrines.

The problem evangelicals forget is they have never read the bible in its original languages. A educated clergy is necessary because of this and because of the difficulty that comes from properly understanding the scriptures.

Coach do you mean that a person with no experience in Christianity could be dropped onto a deserted island with a bible. Read it on that island and understand it completly.

I don't think so. People understand the bible only when they are educated in how to read and understand it.

I wonder if there's a communication problem? In hierarchical churches there's a technical definition of heresy. When I was Evangelical, though, there was more of a feeling about heresy - to call something heresy meant something kind of like that it was shockingly wrong, possibly to the point that it might effect salvation. Luther is using a technical meaning of heresy based upon confessional Lutheranism.

That is true, and by orthodox definitions, some of what I belive in is heresy. I can accept that, it doesn't bother me.
 
Upvote 0