- Feb 25, 2016
- 11,539
- 2,725
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
First of all, the elevator itself would have to move from the ground out into space at the speed of escape velocity.
Second of all, if this elevator silo breaks at the top, i.e. in the part that's in space, it'll suck all the air off the Earth and we'll suffocate.
Here are some explanations:
Jonathan. the space elevator concept is not about achieving or circumventing escape velocity; it is about achieving orbital velocity... not quite the same thing. The exit point of the typical space elevator concept is at geostationary orbital altitude - some 22,000 miles above the equator. An object in orbit, and the exit point of the space elevator (at that altitude) would have a velocity of something like 3,400 miles per hour - far less than escape velocity. Maintaining a lower orbit (like that of ISS) requires much higher velocity (~17,000 mph); perhaps that is the cause of confusion. – Anthony X Dec 9 '13 at 3:16
The space elevator is assisted upwards by centrifugal force which is an outward push provided to any object that is rotating. We used it all the time in the dental laboratory to cast molten metal into a matrix. Release the pin and the arm where the metal is cradled spins and shoots the it straight into the waiting mold.
In the same way, but assisted by electromagnetism, space elevators would be gradually pushed outwards in the direction of space by Earth’s 1000 mph rotation. At a certain elevation gravity and centrifugal force would cancel each other out and the centrifugal force would begin to predominate. In fact, if allowed to continue undetained, the Earth’s centrifugal force would propel the elevator all the way to the asteroid belt.
Space elevator - Wikipedia
About breakage and all Earth's air immediately being suctioned into space.
Such accidents are prepared for just as they are with every other space venture where things are provided with triple redundancy. Also, if it did haoppen, actual amount of atmosphere siphoned through tat relatively small aperture would be insignificant in relation to the total volume. That would provide plenty of time for repair or a sealing off.
Here is another article that dismisses the escape velocity objection by explaining that gradually floating the elevator upwards via electromagnetism and centrifugal force would be suffice.
The elevator car wouldn’t actually be hauled in the conventional fashion; instead of wheels and pulleys, it would float upward along a track attached to the tower and cable, using electromagnetism. Such a vehicle would not only be super-efficient, energy-wise, but it also would be much faster than a conventional elevator and its parts would be subjected to less wear and tear. NASA scientists envisioned creating such a space highway in the distant future, but in a followup 2003 report funded by NASA’s Institute for Advanced Concepts, author Bradley C. Edwards ventured that an elevator could be built by 2018 at a cost of just $10 billion on a man-made floating base (either a ship or an oil platform in the tropics.
http://tvblogs.nationalgeographic.com/2011/06/16/escaping-earth-could-a-space-elevator-work/
https://www.quora.com/If-a-space-el...quently-reach-destination-e-g-a-space-station
Here are other responses related to elevator escape velocity
Escape velocity from long ladder
Upvote
0