Good idea; it will be fun to hear the JWs come around explaining how Noah's Flood worked and where the firmament went
I actually believe that there was a global flood, but not 'Noah's flood' - they made Noah up - actually Noah is Dionysus reworked.
I studied the Genesis beginning bit - and concluded that it was ancient-world cosmology - they had a square of land, water below, and up in the sky more water. Someone opened the 'gates of heaven' and water tipped down - that's how we get rain. And the firmament was made of brass - with windows in it.
The very first bit, is true though IMO - the light separated from darkness has deeper meaning - and I don't know what that is.
I've read a lot of young-earth books, and some of what they say is true - the earth was hyperbaric, and there was Pangaea, and everything did grow big - because of hyperbaric atmosphere. But people? - doubtful. Mammals? - doubtful.
The coal deposits are best explained by a global flood, and the coal has no carbon 14 left - so it must be older than 40,000 years - so the earth is older than 40,000 years.
But 4.5 billion years old? Doubtful - as there would be more supernovas, and more material in the solar system.
The establishment states with absolute certainty their age of the earth - I think not. And absolute certainty their Darwinism - I think not.
I'm not a young-earth creationist, but I am a creationist, because I believe in creation, not Darwinism - because of the evidence. I also get hacked off by the continuous drumming of the establishment of their Darwinism - I know that young-earthers are totally fed up with as well.
At the moment I am still doing the research - reading books from both sides of the divide - and my thoughts at the moment - a global flood, about 200,000 years ago - and different fauna, but the same flora - some of the old fauna survived, somehow into modern times - but you don't get modern mammals mixed up with the old order - you just don't - despite the yecs trying to wriggle it in - I've never got a straight answer from that ilk - just stuff like - 'when are you going to accept that our Hebrew Bible is the "Word of God"?
The old myths about the 'sons of God' are derived from the Greeks - the Genesis account is lifted from the Greeks - so any information about 'reptilians' will come from the Greeks. At the moment, I can see evidence that there were reptilian humanoid creatures in ancient times - which bred with humans to create aberrations. There was also a corruption if fauna, IMO.
Any mention of reptilians, and people think of David Icke, and that's the end of it - I don't care about David Icke -my opinions have developed because of the evidence.