rusmeister
A Russified American Orthodox Chestertonian
- Dec 9, 2005
- 10,589
- 5,387
- Country
- Montenegro
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
I read this article the other day: Why young Christians aren't waiting anymore CNN Belief Blog - CNN.com Blogs
It jives with what I've been hearing for years. I was active in some Evangelical youth groups in high school, and I've seen the whole "chastity pledge" thing, then some young couple held up on a pillar for all to see and emulate, and then everyone hears in hushed whispers, "Oops...they did it."
Frederica Mathews-Green wrote an article some time ago that I just also read recently: Frederica Mathewes-Green on Teen Pregnancy on National Review Online
Seems she's identifying a systemic problem that is making it ever harder to mesh traditional Christian morality with the modern patterns of culture...not just that we're bombarded with sex every minute of every day, but that young people are basically extending their childhoods by a decade or more. After high school comes college...then if you really want to be marketable, better sink another 2-3 years into a Master's degree...then you'd better break off family ties and relationships (if you haven't already) and move to wherever you can get a job that you really want, then you'd better get all your ducks in a row...then maybe it's time to settle down. I have some old college pals who I occasionally talk to, and a few are still living like they're 20...but they're 35.
Really, the entire pattern of life is based around money and consumerism. Don't get married early, or you won't be able to pick up and move across the country when that next job opens up! Don't have kids, or you won't be able to spend all your nights and weekends working your way up the ladder, or taking extra classes to get more degrees to get even more money!
So...are we all kidding ourselves in thinking that we can teach young people to both live on their own, out in "the world" for 6-10 years, and be chaste until marriage...when they have their own dorm rooms or apartments with nobody to hold them accountable and nobody to help them when they get too close to the fire?
Is Frederica right? Should we roll back the clock and encourage young people to get married in their late teens or early 20's? Have we gone too far down the wrong path that it's just too late and we should be pragmatic in telling them "try to wait, but if you can't, for God's sake don't get pregnant?"
(For those who live outside the U.S., is this any different elsewhere? From what I've heard from people who've lived in Western Europe, America is actually pretty tame by comparison).
I highlighted what I see to be one of the problems - out attitude toward people getting married when they are 18-24 - the metaphor for "turning the clock back" is perpetual - and false. (My thanks to GK Chesterton for pointing that one out)
There is one metaphor of which the moderns are very fond; they are always saying, "You can't put the clock back." The simple and obvious answer is "You can." A clock, being a piece of human construction, can be restored by the human finger to any figure or hour. In the same way society, being a piece of human construction, can be reconstructed upon any plan that has ever existed. There is another proverb, "As you have made your bed, so you must lie on it"; which again is simply a lie. If I have made my bed uncomfortable, please God I will make it again. We could restore the Heptarchy or the stage coaches if we chose. It might take some time to do, and it might be very inadvisable to do it; but certainly it is not impossible as bringing back last Friday is impossible. This is, as I say, the first freedom that I claim: the freedom to restore. I claim a right to propose as a solution the old patriarchal system of a Highland clan, if that should seem to eliminate the largest number of evils. It certainly would eliminate some evils; for instance, the unnatural sense of obeying cold and harsh strangers, mere bureaucrats and policemen. I claim the right to propose the complete independence of the small Greek or Italian towns, a sovereign city of Brixton or Brompton, if that seems the best way out of our troubles. It would be a way out of some of our troubles; we could not have in a small state, for instance, those enormous illusions about men or measures which are nourished by the great national or international newspapers. You could not persuade a city state that Mr. Beit was an Englishman, or Mr. Dillon a desperado, any more than you could persuade a Hampshire Village that the village drunkard was a teetotaller or the village idiot a statesman. Nevertheless, I do not as a fact propose that the Browns and the Smiths should be collected under separate tartans. Nor do I even propose that Clapham should declare its independence. I merely declare my independence. I merely claim my choice of all the tools in the universe; and I shall not admit that any of them are blunted merely because they have been used.
Since we have definitely gone down the wrong path, the right thing to do is to go back to where we made the wrong turn.
I strongly encourage intelligent folk here to read "What's Wrong With the World by G.K. Chesterton. It is one of his greatest books - both entertaining and enlightening:
To read online:
G K Chesterton's Essays: What's Wrong With The World [Read online]
R.O. or copy (relax, GKC is in the public domain!):
What's Wrong with the World
Upvote
0


