I am speaking of condemnation which can produce a myriad of feelings; such as rejection, fear, hate, sucidal thoughts and/or tendencies, a divide between the person and God, unrelenting guilt, worthlessness, etc..
I don't disagree with you. Condemnation is indeed wrong for anyone to perpetrate against another. Again, please take "yes" for an answer.
I am not sure I know your point here..
Simply that you place much stock in human emotions and feelings. Hollywood, romance novels, and many other sources by which we are all bombarded in our culture, teach that we all should follow our 'feelings' and listen to our 'emotions'. The emotional and feeling part of our humanity is an inferior guide. Our feelings and emotions change from moment to moment each and every day. So, feelings and emotions are not credible guides for our lives.
Let's use one of your hypotheticals: We have someone who has just been seemingly condemned for their sin, and they feel anger toward God and the world, and they feel condemned for reasons that none of us can possible explain with any degree of rationality. So, they climb out onto the ledge of the tenth floor, and leap off into the air. Who is to ultimately blame? Was it the person who seemingly condemned, or was it God's fault, or was it the person who took the leap out into thin air?
No matter how you slice it and dice it all up, the final responsibility rests with the one on the receiving end of the rebuke/condemnation. Granted, justifying condemnation is not a part of this mix. The one on the receiving end of the rebuke/condemnation
FELT condemnation, so they acted foolishly on that
feeling.
Again, I agree that anyone condemning anyone else is wrong, so let's allow that dead dog to rest in peace.
How about this hypothetical: Your so-called "pastor" and his wife join up with a wife-swapping ring in your religious church organization, thus his sleeping around with other men's wives, etc., (which actually did happen here in my home city, and was publicized on the front page of the local newspaper for us all to read). Now, did he and his wife make the decision to join the ring just spur-of-the-moment, or was there something such as lust already going on in their lives leading up to their agreement to join such a ring?
Quite frankly, he and his wife already had deep-seated sin in full sprout deep within their souls for them both to have actively particiapted in such a horrid activity, especially for more than two years. The same can be applied to the topic of condemnation. The alleged believer who condemns another, does so from the foundation of something already wrong in their lives. The one on the receiving end of the condemnation so easily distonacing themselves from God and others already had some things gravely wrong in their lives for them to react in a way that they self-destruct, or whatever else they may do...even distancing themselves from others. Nobody suddenly withdraws from all others without there already having been some sort of mix already in place for a catalyst such as verbal condemnation to push them further into rejection and isolation...and even suicide.
Just an observation.
No. It will not. Feelings of condemnation are NOT from the Holy Spirit..conviction is.
Not in all cases. The one who has intentionally walked away from the Lord in order to better enjoy the false pleasures of this world can indeed be assaulted with a deep feeling if condemnation from the Holy Spirit. Why? Simply that they have placed their eternal future in grave jeaopardy, and thus have set their own feet upon the path of ultimate condemnation and self-destruction if they choose to not return to the Lord. The Lord used a man like pharaoh to His glory, so He can certainly use a feeling of condemnation to demonstrate to a soul that they are in grave danger of something they don't fully understand.
There is a way to rebuke, with gentleness and respect.
Sure there is, and it sometimes works, but not always.
...a person's words can cause people to build a wall, not only between themself and other people...But between them and God..
My friend, please don't belittle the power of God...and yes, that's
exactly what you're doing. No man or woman can possibly foil God's ultimate plans, especially for another soul. Our harsh words toward another can indeed affect them, and maybe even cause them to build even higher walls than were already built, but they can never be walls that enfeeble the power of God.
I can't begin to count how many times I've heard the lament, "Great harm has been done to the cause of Christ by so and so." That is utter foolishness. No mortal or immortal has the power to overcome God's plan for even the life of a sparrow. The aggressor will indeed be dealt with as God sees fit, but such an aggressor has no greater power to cause difficulty to God's ultimate plans than your or I can force God to accept Satan as His equal.
Yes that affects their relationship with Him..
The effects we may have on another that are contrary to God's plan for them are only temporary. In the end, we don't have the power to bring His plans down into the dust. God is not so feeble. I will agree with you that any negative effect we may have upon another because of our wrongdoing is indeed sin on our part, but we can also rest assured in the midst of any honest mistakes we may make toward another never do irreparable damage to God's ultimate plan for a life.
..and even still, a person not yet saved who knows how far away we could possibly drive them from Christ with to harsh of words..
And yet we don't have the power to drive another too far from Christ that He cannot reach them.
I submit from the above Scripture that not only can we cause others to be tempted, but can also cause them to sin..
There's nothing so remarkable about this submission that it renders God powerless in the life of another simply by what we may do or not do. Causing another to sin is indeed a grievous thing, and He would deal with us accordingly, but His ultimate plan for that other soul is never placed beyond the reach of His ultimate accomplishments in their life.
I think we both agree on all these things. It's just a matter of bringing more of the realities, thus far not addressed, into the scope of our conversation.
Oh please. Don't presume to know my intentions! It appears very judgemental.
I judged your words, not you personally. You too have judged my words, even to the extent of ignoring my "yes" in agreement with you.
I do not believe for one momment that the verse only means that children can be caused to sin. Children are not the only ones who can be led astray by others.
Once again you missed the point. That verse states quite clearly that causing a child to sin is far more grievous, and that doing so is cause to hang a millstone about one's neck and being cast into the sea.
For example, when a dad tells his bully son to go ahead and whoop another kid to show that he's not ever going to be stood up to, well, that's a grievous sin on the part of that dad for instructing his son to sin, thus that dad placing his own soul in grave danger of God's judgement. Dare you go up to him and rebuke him in love, and he'll flatten your nose for you. Rationalize with him what he told his boy to do, and he'll flatten your nose. There are times that no amount of love will ever reach that kind of man, for such men undertand only one thing....violence.
If I go to him and beat him to a pulp myself, and then reach out to him with loving rebuke, he might be more receptive after finding himself face to face with a more powerful physical force than himself, therefore his feelings about the whole situation
might indeed be different. I'm not justifying violence, but rather that the Lord can use many things with wich we all may disagree. That speaks of His sovereignty, without limitations.
Hypotheticals can be quite similar to parables I believe if they are used the right way..
I've heard people state that Jesus' parables were hypotheticals. As for myself, I personally believe that when He stated, "There once was a man...," I believe He was speaking factually rather than hypothetically. After all, no falsehood ever left His lips, so when He said, "There once was a man...," He meant what He said quite literally.
BTW&DM