As I said, the size of the universe is so big that it more than makes up for the impropabilty for an event like the forming of life. Lets just assume the chance for a planet to be inhabitable is 0.00001%. We assume, there are 100000000 of stars in the universe, and we assume that every star has at least one planet. This way, we have a chance of 10%, if I am right, that one of the planets is inhabitable. Now, this isnt much, either, I just wanted to show you that the chance for something to happen, no matter how small this chance may be, becomes much bigger if you have lots of occasions where this chance exists.
You see, its not as impropable for life to exist as some people believe. I dont regard this as evidence for God.
The chances of finding a hospitable planet are much smaller than 0.00001%. The planet itself must have all the the necessary materials, a proper atmosphere, as well as proper placement from the star. Every star is not hospitable. Some are too big, too small, or are too dangerous to be around.
Not to mention, all of our stars follow the same laws. The same measures of gravity, for example, apply all around. What you neglect taking into account is the fact that our laws are static, they don't change, and so they can't adjust or experiment to see which laws are allow for the possibility of life.
Why does the universe work the way it does? There's nothing about the electron that makes itself circle the nucleus, but it does anyway. Is there anything about H2O that dictates it has to be a clear liquid?
Did the Big Band just happen to get it right the first time when it created matter and set the relationships for which the elements would react to one another?
Who says that this machine ever changes, or that the God who created the universe is anything like you portray them? He could just as well be malevolent or just plain apathetic to our existence. He could have created it and then abandoned us. With your reasoning, we still have no answer why Christianity is true, not Islam or even the lore of Lovecraft.
If the machine never changes, it couldn't adjust itself so that it could eventually create a proper universe. Without change, the universe-creating machine would be useless. With change, it fails to establish the starting point we're looking for.
The God of the Bible is as I described. He never changes, and He knows the future (able to see all time in front of Him). To Him, a day is like a thousand, and a thousand are like a day. I don't know if you've ever heard theories of the hypothetical dimensions beyond the third dimension, but one of the higher dimensions is one where all of time and space is seen at once, as if it were a single point. The first thing that comes to mind when I think about this is God.
However, if God is not as the Bible describes, and if He doesn't exist outside of time, then He's just as useless as the machine.
I'm not trying to prove that Christianity is the true religion. That would be a different kind of discussion. But what I'm trying to prove is how there must be a monotheistic God as a purposeful designer, who exists outside of time.
Now, about the start of the universe, I know that science doesnt have answers for everything, but neither have you. Science cant give you an answer of what the universe was like before it was created, or on how to create life. Religion, on the other hand, never gave humanity a satisfying answer on how to build cars, travel to the moon or on who killed John F. Kennedy.
What the universe what like before it was created? If there was a point where the universe didn't exist, then it wasn't
like anything. And if there was nothing, how could something suddenly come out of that? We never see matter creating itself in our universe.
But, most importantly, just because we have no answer for something doesnt mean we can put whatever we want into the blanks. If we assume that it must be God who created the universe in the first place, we still have no idea what he is like, or which religion is true. The only thing we know is that he exists, and nothing else.
Why not? We fill the blanks all the time. The very premise of this topic is that you've seen no proof that God exists, and your conclusion is that He doesn't.
Id say it was the second part, although I dont know for sure. Well, most of the time, I hear that everyone who commits suicide ends in hell because its technically murder and because our lifes dont belong to us, but to God.
There is no clear answer for this. People disagree on the issue. The Bible doesn't say that people who commit suicide. You would think that if this were some unforgivable taboo, then God would have given a clear warning against it.
It's true that our lives belong to God, but we do lots of things with our lives that we shouldn't do, things much worse than suicide. David himself was an adulterer and a murderer, but no one would say that David went to Hell.
Jesus' blood forgives us for our sins. How is suicide different? There is an unforgivable sin, but it's not suicide.
The difference is, God is omnipotent. So what reason does he have for not helping us if we ask?
If God only helps us if we help ourself, then we can just go on without his assistance and do everything by ourself.
God doesn't deliver our every need on a silver platter whenever we ask for it. God leads us and directs our lives and the lives of others to provide for us. You could try to provide for yourself, but without God's providence, you won't have much luck. Fortunately, God provides for everyone, even unbelievers, but it's better for us to be on His side and to have that assurance.