How do you know if you did Revelation 19 and 20?

[JohnB445]

Is this an easy thing to do and very easy thing to do on accident?

From what I take from it, is your not allowed to rewrite the Bible changing, adding or taking away.

But it may even go further than that. I don't know, it's not being very descriptive.

 

[Residential Bob]

Adding to the book is inevitable if prophecy is still future.

Futurists add to it all the time with their theories.

 

[Pethesedzao]

Is this an easy thing to do and very easy thing to do on accident?

From what I take from it, is your not allowed to rewrite the Bible changing, adding or taking away.

But it may even go further than that. I don't know, it's not being very descriptive.

Adding to scripture refers to the prophetic words in the Book of Revelation and not the Bible.

 

[BobRyan]

Is this an easy thing to do and very easy thing to do on accident?

From what I take from it, is your not allowed to rewrite the Bible changing, adding or taking away.

But it may even go further than that. I don't know, it's not being very descriptive.

Rev 19 is the second coming and Rev 20:1-5 is the first resurrection which is the one that happens at the Rev 19 second coming.

(No chapter divisions in John's text)

Rev 20 is the desolate Earth millennium followed by the second resurrection and great white throne judgment where all the wicked are cast into the lake of fire.

 

[Artra]

Odd how the authors of books like Left Behind forgot that part of Revelations. Unless they're excusing it as fan-fiction of a future event that will devastate billions of people and leave them to a terrible fate.

 

[Artra]

Rev 19 is the second coming and Rev 20:1-5 is the first resurrection which is the one that happens at the Rev 19 second coming.

(No chapter divisions in John's text)

Rev 20 is the desolate Earth millennium followed by the second resurrection and great white throne judgment where all the wicked are cast into the lake of fire.

I believe OP meant Revelation 22:18-19

 

[Kenny'sID]

Adding to scripture refers to the prophetic words in the Book of Revelation and not the Bible.

I've always wondered what was true there, the Bible or just Revelation?

How did you determine it applies only to revaluation?

 

[Pethesedzao]

I've always wondered what was true there, the Bible or just Revelation?

How did you determine it applies only to revaluation?

It says, this book, which is referring to Revelation only

 

[Kenny'sID]

It says, this book, which is referring to Revelation only

The bible is a book as well, that's the whole conundrum.

 

[Pethesedzao]

The bible is a book as well, that's the whole conundrum.

Yes, we shouldn't add to God's word anyway, but which word is from God though?

 

[BobRyan]

I've always wondered what was true there, the Bible or just Revelation?

How did you determine it applies only to revaluation?

It applies to all of scripture -- but John certainly meant it for Revelation for the reader. Later John write the Gospel of John - and the same rule applies (no editing deleting changing scripture)

 

[HTacianas]

Is this an easy thing to do and very easy thing to do on accident?

From what I take from it, is your not allowed to rewrite the Bible changing, adding or taking away.

But it may even go further than that. I don't know, it's not being very descriptive.

If you rewrite the bible to give it some other meaning.

 

[Kenny'sID]

Is this an easy thing to do and very easy thing to do on accident?

From what I take from it, is your not allowed to rewrite the Bible changing, adding or taking away.

But it may even go further than that. I don't know, it's not being very descriptive.

Lets take OSAS for instance... every time someone changes, takes away from or adds to the scripture just enough to make the lie stick, God will require of them a serious, and very high price.

Unfortunately those who would push the easy doctrine they love so much, don't seem to get that.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

Is this an easy thing to do and very easy thing to do on accident?

From what I take from it, is your not allowed to rewrite the Bible changing, adding or taking away.

But it may even go further than that. I don't know, it's not being very descriptive.

in which manuscript variation of the book of Revelation? whoever made it so confusing to figure out what the real deal is, probably already got it. We're not responsible.

 

[JohnB445]

in which manuscript variation of the book of Revelation? whoever made it so confusing to figure out what the real deal is, probably already got it. We're not responsible.

I use the Textus Receptus.

I just want to write Greek to study the Greek language, and wanted to do it in a fun way by reading the Bible in Greek and Writing it.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

I use the Textus Receptus.

I just want to write Greek to study the Greek language, and wanted to do it in a fun way by reading the Bible in Greek and Writing it.

Textus Receptus was a medley of the manuscripts that were available in 1516

 

[JohnB445]

Textus Receptus was a medley of the manuscripts that were available in 1516

I heard the Textus Receptus is the Manuscript that is used by the Orthodox Church.

 

[EastCoastRemnant]

Lets take OSAS for instance... every time someone changes, takes away from or adds to the scripture just enough to make the lie stick, God will require of them a serious, and very high price.

Unfortunately those who would push the easy doctrine they love so much, don't seem to get that.

This perfectly illustrates the change of worship from Sabbath the 7th day to Sunday the 1st day. No where in the Bible is this change noted and the catholic church fully admits that it did so on it's own authority and not from scripture.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

I heard the Textus Receptus is the Manuscript that is used by the Orthodox Church.

I picked my Orthodox Study Bible off the shelf.

To confirm, it uses the Septuagint for the Old Testament, and the NKJV for the New Testament.