• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How do Christians reconcile the problem of evil?

A

Akureyri

Guest
I can figure out only two ways Christians can reconcile the problem of evil.

1) Change their construct of God, so that God either doesn't love everyone or that God can't do anything.

2) Avoid thinking about the logical invalidity. E.g., let's say Jimmy says A plus B equals C and also says C minus B does not equal A; but he fails to perform the algebra which will show not both of those can be true.

If #1 is selected and their construct is changed by saying God doesn't love everyone, then it raises the question of how Christians can reconcile a god that doesn't love us enough to protect us from things like natural disasters, rapists, murderers, etc.
 

Scott1979

Grateful
Jul 12, 2011
750
65
USA
✟16,235.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Free will is the best answer I can give you. While God wants us to be a certain, He doesn't control us like Hitler. He gives us free will to make decisions on our own. We are all born with a basic sense of right and wrong. People decide to hurt other people plain and simple. As far as natural disasters go I think free will plays into that as well. Everyone pretty much knows the weather "bad spots" so to speak in the US and other parts of the world. If you move to Florida, your going to get hit by a hurricane, Oklahoma, you will see a tornado. People make up there own minds to move to these parts and can't blame God when these weather events happen.
 
Upvote 0

dhh712

Mrs. Calvinist Dark Lord
Jul 16, 2013
778
283
Gettysburg
✟42,497.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
I can figure out only two ways Christians can reconcile the problem of evil.

1) Change their construct of God, so that God either doesn't love everyone or that God can't do anything.

2) Avoid thinking about the logical invalidity. E.g., let's say Jimmy says A plus B equals C and also says C minus B does not equal A; but he fails to perform the algebra which will show not both of those can be true.

If #1 is selected and their construct is changed by saying God doesn't love everyone, then it raises the question of how Christians can reconcile a god that doesn't love us enough to protect us from things like natural disasters, rapists, murderers, etc.

The only way it makes sense is if one were to consider Christianity as God-centered and not humanity-centered. If it is humanity-centered and we have an all-loving God and that is it, then--why is this world such a bad place? Why doesn't God, in all His power, and in His ability to do whatsoever He wishes to do, if He loves everyone--why is there suffering?

I understand if suffering only happens to "bad" people. Yet it happens to "good" people too. I tried believing in God under a non-denominational banner without the sense of it being God-centered, but I could not get past this idea of why is the world such a bad place if God is all-loving? Those who are fervent in their devotion to Him still suffer. It did not make sense.

There is a lot more I can say on it (such as though God has ultimate power, the world is under the limited power of Satan and those who are not in Christ are servants of him; they cannot do any good to the will of God--they are completely without this capability. It is only when God condescends to give them the gift of faith that He frees them from their bondage to Satan and imparts to them a craving to serve Him. That is just one part of it, but there's lots more I don't have the time to go into), but that is the basis of it.

When we consider Christianity as humanity-based, that is when it all falls apart and things just don't add up (though one can certainly avoid the harsh truth and say, "Oh, no, no no--God loves us all." And though that is certainly true, it is not a love where He promises to provide us with all earthly, physical and materialistic benefits with no chastisement. I think people confuse this with love).

Under the God-centered idea, it is still very complex [and if one is still fixed under the humanity-centered idea of Christianity, the idea of serving such a God might not impart this gushy feeling of love because it is not all about us (nevertheless it should, if we love God)], but that is because He is incomprehensible--there is not one person who can fully understand His mind and have complete knowledge of Him.
 
Upvote 0
A

Akureyri

Guest
Free will is the best answer I can give you.
Help me along.
How does free will come into play if a tornado rips through a city in Oklahoma? While the people may have freely chose to live in that part of Oklahoma, the tornado didn't freely choose to rip through that area. And if God can do anything, then can't he freely choose to divert the tornado to an unpopulated region?

While God wants us to be a certain, He doesn't control us like Hitler.
I'm glad you mentioned Hitler. If God loved all those Jews, then why didn't he strike Hitler dead with a heart attack before he could have tortured all those Jews?

He gives us free will to make decisions on our own. We are all born with a basic sense of right and wrong. People decide to hurt other people plain and simple.
Does the Christian God simply not care if a rapist chooses to molest an innocent 12 year old girl? Wouldn't the Christian God have the power to intervene and prevent the rape - especially if he can do anything? If he is capable of preventing the rape, but doesn't, the only possible explanation is that he doesn't love the child enough to prevent the rape. That would then raise the question of why worship such a malevolent God?

As far as natural disasters go I think free will plays into that as well. Everyone pretty much knows the weather "bad spots" so to speak in the US and other parts of the world. If you move to Florida, your going to get hit by a hurricane, Oklahoma, you will see a tornado. People make up there own minds to move to these parts and can't blame God when these weather events happen.
If God loves the people who are in the path of a destructive tornado, but does nothing, then he is not behaving in accordance with his love for the people. If God does love them, but does nothing, then the only explanation is that God isn't capable of preventing the tornado.
 
Upvote 0

Messy

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
10,027
2,082
Holland
✟21,082.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Help me along.
How does free will come into play if a tornado rips through a city in Oklahoma? While the people may have freely chose to live in that part of Oklahoma, the tornado didn't freely choose to rip through that area. And if God can do anything, then can't he freely choose to divert the tornado to an unpopulated region?


I'm glad you mentioned Hitler. If God loved all those Jews, then why didn't he strike Hitler dead with a heart attack before he could have tortured all those Jews?


Does the Christian God simply not care if a rapist chooses to molest an innocent 12 year old girl? Wouldn't the Christian God have the power to intervene and prevent the rape - especially if he can do anything? If he is capable of preventing the rape, but doesn't, the only possible explanation is that he doesn't love the child enough to prevent the rape. That would then raise the question of why worship such a malevolent God?


If God loves the people who are in the path of a destructive tornado, but does nothing, then he is not behaving in accordance with his love for the people. If God does love them, but does nothing, then the only explanation is that God isn't capable of preventing the tornado.
Adam and Eve sinned, so the earth was cursed and after the flood came the tornado's.
Why doesn't kill God everybody who hurts someone else?
He'll deal with evil in the end, but He's patient and wants everybody to get saved.
He gave the authority over the earth to Adam, Adam gave it to satan. People still serve the devil and do bad things. Easy to blame God for it. If He did whatever He wanted everybody was saved and healed and there was no more pain. He can't do anything if someone doesn't want to, christian or not. He can't do anything on earth unless His Body (christians) invite Him and pray and it's limited, you can't pray away every tornado. Those are birth pangs, because we get a new heaven and a new earth and all sin and pain will be gone.
 
Upvote 0
A

Akureyri

Guest
The only way it makes sense is if one were to consider Christianity as God-centered and not humanity-centered. If it is humanity-centered and we have an all-loving God and that is it, then--why is this world such a bad place? Why doesn't God, in all His power, and in His ability to do whatsoever He wishes to do, if He loves everyone--why is there suffering?
Is the God of a God-centered Christianity capable of doing anything? Does it love everyone? If so, then we still have the same problem?

I understand if suffering only happens to "bad" people. Yet it happens to "good" people too.
This is not good news for people who maintain that a Christian god would favor Christians over non-Christians.

I tried believing in God under a non-denominational banner without the sense of it being God-centered, but I could not get past this idea of why is the world such a bad place if God is all-loving? Those who are fervent in their devotion to Him still suffer. It did not make sense.

There is a lot more I can say on it (such as though God has ultimate power, the world is under the limited power of Satan and those who are not in Christ are servants of him; they cannot do any good to the will of God--they are completely without this capability. It is only when God condescends to give them the gift of faith that He frees them from their bondage to Satan and imparts to them a craving to serve Him. That is just one part of it, but there's lots more I don't have the time to go into), but that is the basis of it.

When we consider Christianity as humanity-based, that is when it all falls apart and things just don't add up (though one can certainly avoid the harsh truth and say, "Oh, no, no no--God loves us all." And though that is certainly true, it is not a love where He promises to provide us with all earthly, physical and materialistic benefits with no chastisement. I think people confuse this with love).
Then am I correct if I were to say Christians are mistaken when they say "God loves everyone"?

Under the God-centered idea, it is still very complex [and if one is still fixed under the humanity-centered idea of Christianity, the idea of serving such a God might not impart this gushy feeling of love because it is not all about us (nevertheless it should, if we love God)], but that is because He is incomprehensible--there is not one person who can fully understand His mind and have complete knowledge of Him.
I sense that you are reconciling the problem of evil by going with option #1 - that either God doesn't really love everyone and/or can't really do anything. Am I correct?
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hello Akureyri, welcome to the forums! I am glad to see you here asking questions like this. I hope you get good value from it.
I can figure out only two ways Christians can reconcile the problem of evil.
How much effort have you placed into this understanding? The reason I ask is because there is a great deal more than two Christians around here, and that many Christians is how many perspectives you may encounter.
1) Change their construct of God, so that God either doesn't love everyone or that God can't do anything.
The word I will contest with you here is the word "Can't'". I don't think your conclusion is correct. If you were to say that God chooses not to do anything in some cases, then I would support your observation. Choosing to believe that will lead you to ask why He makes that decision, and it might lead you to a greater understanding of Him.
2) Avoid thinking about the logical invalidity. E.g., let's say Jimmy says A plus B equals C and also says C minus B does not equal A; but he fails to perform the algebra which will show not both of those can be true.
I would like to understand why you think God's tolerance of evil equates to a "logical invalidity". Could you explain this for me?
If #1 is selected and their construct is changed by saying God doesn't love everyone, then it raises the question of how Christians can reconcile a god that doesn't love us enough to protect us from things like natural disasters, rapists, murderers, etc.
Then you're saying that He should protect cauliflowers from possums and snails from being stepped on. That would be a world where we have no control over ourselves (granted, there are people who feel that they are in that situation eg.Stephen Hawking Denounces God & Freewill). This world just naturally is dangerous, and it is dangerous for a variety of reasons. You're confusing yourself by thinking that natural disasters are comparable to rape or murder.

My impression at this stage, is that you're blaming God for what you don't like in the world. Is that a fair summary?
 
Upvote 0

singpeace

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Oct 21, 2009
2,439
459
U.S.
✟62,677.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I can figure out only two ways Christians can reconcile the problem of evil.

1) Change their construct of God, so that God either doesn't love everyone or that God can't do anything.

2) Avoid thinking about the logical invalidity. E.g., let's say Jimmy says A plus B equals C and also says C minus B does not equal A; but he fails to perform the algebra which will show not both of those can be true.

If #1 is selected and their construct is changed by saying God doesn't love everyone, then it raises the question of how Christians can reconcile a god that doesn't love us enough to protect us from things like natural disasters, rapists, murderers, etc.


Akureyri,
The most loving act of eternity is described in Romans 5:8, “But God demonstrates His own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”

We can understand why natural disasters occur. What we do not understand is why God allows them to occur. Why did God allow the tsunami to kill over 225,000 people in Asia? Why did God allow Hurricane Katrina to destroy the homes of thousands of people? For one thing, such events shake our confidence in this life and force us to think about eternity. Churches are usually filled after disasters as people realize how tenuous their lives really are and how life can be taken away in an instant. What we do know is this: God is good! Many amazing miracles occurred during the course of natural disasters that prevented even greater loss of life. Natural disasters cause millions of people to reevaluate their priorities in life. Hundreds of millions of dollars in aid is sent to help the people who are suffering. Christian ministries have the opportunity to help, minister, counsel, pray, and lead people to saving faith in Christ! God can, and does, bring great good out of terrible tragedies (Romans 8:28)
 
Upvote 0

dhh712

Mrs. Calvinist Dark Lord
Jul 16, 2013
778
283
Gettysburg
✟42,497.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Is the God of a God-centered Christianity capable of doing anything? Does it love everyone? If so, then we still have the same problem?

That He loves everyone, but then predestinates some onto death makes it seem then that He doesn't love everyone. I cannot explain it; I still haven't grasped the doctrine of predestination yet. Logically, the conclusion to draw would be to say that He doesn't love everyone. Yet that would be trying to figure God out and that I, nor anyone, can do. His word says He loves everyone, and I trust in God not in my own nor the world's logic.


This is not good news for people who maintain that a Christian god would favor Christians over non-Christians.

To suffer for righteousness' sake (which I interpret to mean not to suffer just because you messed up and sinned) is one of the greatest blessings to a Christian. Christ suffered and He was without sin. If we are to follow Christ, it is almost guaranteed we will suffer at some point. Perhaps that is not something some people are willing to go through.


I sense that you are reconciling the problem of evil by going with option #1 - that either God doesn't really love everyone and/or can't really do anything. Am I correct?

I reconcile the problem of evil by reading His word, which I am not quite half-way through yet. So far what I have been given to understand concerning the problem of evil is that He is an all-loving God and that Satan has limited power in the world. Though God has the ultimate power, He will not disrupt the power which Satan has in this world because it is not His will to do so.

It also seems from what I am gathering that what God desires and what is His will are different, but I do not have very much knowledge about this topic (perhaps it is something like He has His plan, which is His will which will be carried out; He also has what He desires, but if it is contrary to His will, it will not happen. This may seem like it imposes limitations on God, and I can't explain why that is or isn't. However, this may not necessarily be an issue because God cannot sin--so therefore, that already seems like an established limitation).
 
Upvote 0
A

Akureyri

Guest
Adam and Eve sinned, so the earth was cursed and after the flood came the tornado's.
If God can do anything, then why didn't he prevent the tornadoes?

Why doesn't kill God everybody who hurts someone else?
I'm not the one positing a god. I'm asking about the god others have posited. Perhaps you can tell me why God doesn't punish those who hurt others rather than punish people in such an arbitrary/random manner that is no different than if there were no god.

He'll deal with evil in the end, but He's patient and wants everybody to get saved.
Please explain how things like tornadoes and tsunamis are evil.

He gave the authority over the earth to Adam, Adam gave it to satan. People still serve the devil and do bad things. Easy to blame God for it. If He did whatever He wanted everybody was saved and healed and there was no more pain. He can't do anything if someone doesn't want to, christian or not. He can't do anything on earth unless His Body (christians) invite Him and pray and it's limited, you can't pray away every tornado. Those are birth pangs, because we get a new heaven and a new earth and all sin and pain will be gone.
So you're saying you reconcile this by saying God is incapable of doing anything. Am I correct?
 
Upvote 0
A

Akureyri

Guest
Hello Akureyri, welcome to the forums! I am glad to see you here asking questions like this. I hope you get good value from it.
Thanks for the welcome.

How much effort have you placed into this understanding? The reason I ask is because there is a great deal more than two Christians around here, and that many Christians is how many perspectives you may encounter.
I've done an extensive amount of study on the logic behind this. There is no other way to reconcile the problem of evil - whether there are two Christians or two billion Christians.

The word I will contest with you here is the word "Can't'". I don't think your conclusion is correct. If you were to say that God chooses not to do anything in some cases, then I would support your observation. Choosing to believe that will lead you to ask why He makes that decision, and it might lead you to a greater understanding of Him.
Perhaps some background is in order. Many of the Christians I have encountered claim God can do anything. They are either right or they are wrong. If they are wrong, then the statement "God can do anything" is inaccurate, meaning if God exists, then the statement "God can't do anything" would have to be accurate or correct.

If God can do anything, but chooses to not stop the rapist from molesting the child, then you have reconciled it by maintaining that God doesn't love the child enough to stop the rapist. Very simple.

I would like to understand why you think God's tolerance of evil equates to a "logical invalidity". Could you explain this for me?
Many Christians posit that God can do anything and loves everyone. This means if a child is about to get raped by a rapist, God would love the child enough that he would stop the rapist from raping the child. Since we know that rape of children does occur, then it would follow that if God exists, he either:
A) doesn't love the children enough to stop the raping or molesting of them
B) doesn't possess the power to stop the rape of molesting of a child

So if a child gets raped, and God loves that child, then it means he wasn't capable of preventing that rape. And if a child gets raped and God can do anything, then he didn't love that child enough to prevent the rape. This is pretty simple stuff.

Then you're saying that He should protect cauliflowers from possums and snails from being stepped on. That would be a world where we have no control over ourselves (granted, there are people who feel that they are in that situation. This world just naturally is dangerous, and it is dangerous for a variety of reasons. You're confusing yourself by thinking that natural disasters are comparable to rape or murder.
No confusion at all. So if a child loses his loving Christian parents due to a destructive tornado, and God loves that child, then it means he wasn't capable of preventing that tornado from killing his parents. And if the child's parents get killed by the tornado and God can do anything, then he didn't love that child enough to prevent the tornado from killing his parents. Once again, this is pretty simple stuff.

My impression at this stage, is that you're blaming God for what you don't like in the world. Is that a fair summary?
I can understand why you have that impression. But I don't have a habit of putting blame on things which I don't even believe to exist.
 
Upvote 0
A

Akureyri

Guest
Akureyri,
The most loving act of eternity is described in Romans 5:8, “But God demonstrates His own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”
If your child were raped by a rapist, would you say it's OK - simply because of some words written in a holy book?

We can understand why natural disasters occur. What we do not understand is why God allows them to occur. Why did God allow the tsunami to kill over 225,000 people in Asia? Why did God allow Hurricane Katrina to destroy the homes of thousands of people?
What do you think are the reason(s) God doesn't intervene and prevent tsunamis, tornadoes and earthquakes from killing loving parents and leaving their children as orphans, people losing their homes or people suffering serious injuries?

For one thing, such events shake our confidence in this life and force us to think about eternity.
Please help me along. Why is it necessary for there to be catastrophic events for one to think about eternity? Don't humans have free will such that they can think about eternity in the absence of catastrophic events?

Churches are usually filled after disasters as people realize how tenuous their lives really are and how life can be taken away in an instant.
People are naturally inclined to seek the comfort and support of their community in the face of a major catastrophe. That's probably why church attendance is extra high after a major hurricane destroys a city.

What we do know is this: God is good!
Really? He's good, yet he sits there and does nothing to help or protect the innocent child who is getting violently raped? Are you positing a God who can do anything and loves everyone?

Many amazing miracles occurred during the course of natural disasters that prevented even greater loss of life.
When and where did these miracles occur? And what natural disasters were prevented? Try to be specific. I'd like to know. Please cite your sources too. Thanks :)

Natural disasters cause millions of people to reevaluate their priorities in life. Hundreds of millions of dollars in aid is sent to help the people who are suffering. Christian ministries have the opportunity to help, minister, counsel, pray, and lead people to saving faith in Christ! God can, and does, bring great good out of terrible tragedies (Romans 8:28)
So you're saying Christian ministries would serve no purpose if there were no major catastrophes such as hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes. Am I correct?

There are already a lot of under privileged, starving and diseased children in Africa. If God really cares, why not prevent the earthquake from hitting Haiti and have the Christian ministries take the money which was used for relief in Haiti and use it to help the starving & diseased children in Africa?
 
Upvote 0

Sophrosyne

Let Your Light Shine.. Matt 5:16
Jun 21, 2007
163,215
64,198
In God's Amazing Grace
✟910,522.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
I see these type of arguments all the time but lets take it further than you have. Someone at the north pole is freezing to death so now God has to melt all the snow and change the climate of the region so they can live. Someone is stranded on an island after they stupidly crash their boat into the rocks and they are starving to death so now God much dry up the entire ocean so they can walk to another island to find food. God sees a gang of kids out to harm others so he puts them all in cages to prevent them from hurting people. Someone at work wants to take a pencil home (steal it) so God now forces the guy to put the pencil back and doesn't allow him to ever use pencils again at that company. Someone wants to live near an active volcano and when it erupts God now has to stop the volcano for good as long as they live near it. We now have nobody allowed to even say things to others that hurt their feelings and God is put into conflicting situations where two people could be hurt having God change things to protect them both in which end in a paradox unable to either save neither one or both but can save one of them from harm. God can divert tornadoes but then a farmer is killed and his farm destroyed and his family and heritage is gone forever and he now blames God. God would have to not allow tornadoes to do any harm nor could any natural disasters ever harm anyone nor can anyone ever be harmed to satisfy the never ending blame God for any resemblance of evil in the world game.
In other words no matter what explanation we give you it is never going to satisfy your desire for heaven on earth which is what you are claiming God must do to prove himself to us.
 
Upvote 0
A

Akureyri

Guest
I see these type of arguments all the time but lets take it further than you have. Someone at the north pole is freezing to death so now God has to melt all the snow and change the climate of the region so they can live. Someone is stranded on an island after they stupidly crash their boat into the rocks and they are starving to death so now God much dry up the entire ocean so they can walk to another island to find food. God sees a gang of kids out to harm others so he puts them all in cages to prevent them from hurting people. Someone at work wants to take a pencil home (steal it) so God now forces the guy to put the pencil back and doesn't allow him to ever use pencils again at that company. Someone wants to live near an active volcano and when it erupts God now has to stop the volcano for good as long as they live near it. We now have nobody allowed to even say things to others that hurt their feelings and God is put into conflicting situations where two people could be hurt having God change things to protect them both in which end in a paradox unable to either save neither one or both but can save one of them from harm. God can divert tornadoes but then a farmer is killed and his farm destroyed and his family and heritage is gone forever and he now blames God. God would have to not allow tornadoes to do any harm nor could any natural disasters ever harm anyone nor can anyone ever be harmed to satisfy the never ending blame God for any resemblance of evil in the world game.

You're describing a god who is limited in his power. For example, when you say God would have to melt the polar ice cap to save the guy at the North Pole, a god that could do anything could transport the guy to a warm climate. If he is limited such that his only option to save the guy would be to melt the ice cap, then he can't do anything - and therefore isn't the type of god I'm raising question about.
In other words no matter what explanation we give you it is never going to satisfy your desire for heaven on earth which is what you are claiming God must do to prove himself to us.
I'm not looking to satisfy my desire for heaven on earth. I'm trying to get a better understanding of how Christians reconcile the problem of evil.

Please re-read my opening post:

I can figure out only two ways Christians can reconcile the problem of evil.

1) Change their construct of God, so that God either doesn't love everyone or that God can't do anything.

2) Avoid thinking about the logical invalidity. E.g., let's say Jimmy says A plus B equals C and also says C minus B does not equal A; but he fails to perform the algebra which will show not both of those can be true.

If #1 is selected and their construct is changed by saying God doesn't love everyone, then it raises the question of how Christians can reconcile a god that doesn't love us enough to protect us from things like natural disasters, rapists, murderers, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Sophrosyne

Let Your Light Shine.. Matt 5:16
Jun 21, 2007
163,215
64,198
In God's Amazing Grace
✟910,522.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
You're describing a god who is limited in his power. For example, when you say God would have to melt the polar ice cap to save the guy at the North Pole, a god that could do anything could transport the guy to a warm climate. If he is limited such that his only option to save the guy would be to melt the ice cap, then he can't do anything - and therefore isn't the type of god I'm raising question about.
I'm not looking to satisfy my desire for heaven on earth. I'm trying to get a better understanding of how Christians reconcile the problem of evil.
God is limited in his power by his nature, he tends to do things starting with natural ways resorting to miracles rarely when a natural solution is acceptable. You have created a straw man God that doesn't mesh with what the Bible equates and thus is invalid for any Christian to defend actions against.
Please re-read my opening post:

I can figure out only two ways Christians can reconcile the problem of evil.

1) Change their construct of God, so that God either doesn't love everyone or that God can't do anything.

2) Avoid thinking about the logical invalidity. E.g., let's say Jimmy says A plus B equals C and also says C minus B does not equal A; but he fails to perform the algebra which will show not both of those can be true.

If #1 is selected and their construct is changed by saying God doesn't love everyone, then it raises the question of how Christians can reconcile a god that doesn't love us enough to protect us from things like natural disasters, rapists, murderers, etc.
I've read all of this, God isn't obliged to change the world back to how it was before Adam and Eve rebelled against him. I don't think God can just get rid of all the natural disasters without "reformatting" the Earth... or wiping it clean and starting over that would include wiping out mankind in the process as ANY sin that man would have would infect his creation and start the cycle yet again. Sin and free will coexist in this earth and God is not required by his nature to prevent sin he has made a way to deal with it and we must accept Jesus in that will. You are demanding God deal with sin yet allowing people to reject Jesus which is his way to deal with it. It is your free will here to put God on trial that God allows you that you would have him extinguish to prevent people from harm. In other words if rape wasn't allowed you wouldn't be posting this stuff you too wouldn't be allowed to disbelieve in God the way you are here.
 
Upvote 0
A

Akureyri

Guest
God is limited in his power by his nature, he tends to do things starting with natural ways resorting to miracles rarely when a natural solution is acceptable. You have created a straw man God that doesn't mesh with what the Bible equates and thus is invalid for any Christian to defend actions against.
Not a straw man God at all. I'm talking about a god that is posited by many Christians - one that can do anything (e.g. stop a tornado, stop a rapist) and one that loves everyone. If you don't believe such a god exists or that a god does exist, but can't do anything, then you have reconciled the problem of evil by having a construct of God such that he is incapable of doing anything. Am I correct?

I've read all of this, God isn't obliged to change the world back to how it was before Adam and Eve rebelled against him. I don't think God can just get rid of all the natural disasters without "reformatting" the Earth... or wiping it clean and starting over that would include wiping out mankind in the process as ANY sin that man would have would infect his creation and start the cycle yet again.
If God can do anything, then he could prevent natural disasters without "reformatting" the Earth. Do you believe in a god that can't do anything?

Sin and free will coexist in this earth and God is not required by his nature to prevent sin he has made a way to deal with it and we must accept Jesus in that will. You are demanding God deal with sin yet allowing people to reject Jesus which is his way to deal with it.
I'm not demanding God do anything. I'm merely saying a god that can do anything and loves everyone can't logically exist in the presence of mass calamities and mass suffering.

It is your free will here to put God on trial that God allows you that you would have him extinguish to prevent people from harm. In other words if rape wasn't allowed you wouldn't be posting this stuff you too wouldn't be allowed to disbelieve in God the way you are here.
If God can do anything, he could wire me differently so that I believe he exists.
 
Upvote 0

intojoy

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2013
1,612
54
✟2,069.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Akureyri said:
I can figure out only two ways Christians can reconcile the problem of evil.

1) Change their construct of God, so that God either doesn't love everyone or that God can't do anything.

2) Avoid thinking about the logical invalidity. E.g., let's say Jimmy says A plus B equals C and also says C minus B does not equal A; but he fails to perform the algebra which will show not both of those can be true.

If #1 is selected and their construct is changed by saying God doesn't love everyone, then it raises the question of how Christians can reconcile a god that doesn't love us enough to protect us from things like natural disasters, rapists, murderers, etc.

Blame it in the devil
 
Upvote 0

Sophrosyne

Let Your Light Shine.. Matt 5:16
Jun 21, 2007
163,215
64,198
In God's Amazing Grace
✟910,522.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Not a straw man God at all. I'm talking about a god that is posited by many Christians - one that can do anything (e.g. stop a tornado, stop a rapist) and one that loves everyone. If you don't believe such a god exists or that a god does exist, but can't do anything, then you have reconciled the problem of evil by having a construct of God such that he is incapable of doing anything. Am I correct?
Just because God has the power to do things doesn't mean his nature and relationship with man and earth posit such so equating it must be so that is contrary to how God reveals himself is a strawman argument.
If God can do anything, then he could prevent natural disasters without "reformatting" the Earth. Do you believe in a god that can't do anything?
I don't believe God can do anything it is an illogical assumption that can put God in opposition to himself. I believe God cannot do things that are against his nature. I don't believe God can destroy himself because his nature prevents it. I don't believe God can sin because of his nature. I don't believe God can force people to love him because of his nature. Now that I have made examples of God not doing everything I seriously doubt you are not going to stop using the nonsensical argument to try and trap Christians into defending your straw man.
I'm not demanding God do anything. I'm merely saying a god that can do anything and loves everyone can't logically exist in the presence of mass calamities and mass suffering.
I guess you completely ignore Jesus death on the cross, God does love everyone this world to him and the suffering is miniscule compared to eternity and God suffered beyond anything we could imagine on the cross to save us from an eternity of suffering and you don't even blink at that but are whining about a very short period of time people suffer here on earth. God allows us free will and he raises up people to help with man's suffering. God does help with it but this is man's world and God doesn't intervene to rule the world and interfere. Your idea of love is to be a tyrant in the end because God would have to rule the world and not allow us sin and in it not allow us free will to do as we please here.
If God can do anything, he could wire me differently so that I believe he exists.
You must believe he exists somehow or you are playing Don Quixote here.
 
Upvote 0

dhh712

Mrs. Calvinist Dark Lord
Jul 16, 2013
778
283
Gettysburg
✟42,497.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
No confusion at all. So if a child loses his loving Christian parents due to a destructive tornado, and God loves that child, then it means he wasn't capable of preventing that tornado from killing his parents. And if the child's parents get killed by the tornado and God can do anything, then he didn't love that child enough to prevent the tornado from killing his parents. Once again, this is pretty simple stuff.

If you are equating God's love to earthly comforts what you are saying would seem to be true.

Perhaps some background is in order. Many of the Christians I have encountered claim God can do anything. They are either right or they are wrong. If they are wrong, then the statement "God can do anything" is inaccurate, meaning if God exists, then the statement "God can't do anything" would have to be accurate or correct.

He probably will not do whatever it takes to prove Himself to people who don't believe in Him. From my understanding of Scripture He doesn't have the level of narcissism most people have when one person doesn't believe the other person and then the other person feels that they have to prove themselves to show they are right.

I've done an extensive amount of study on the logic behind this. There is no other way to reconcile the problem of evil - whether there are two Christians or two billion Christians.

I guess the most logical way to see it is that God has allowed the evil for His glorification; yet, we are operating on our logic which would be limited compared to God's logic (Satan does have limited power in the world--after all, this place isn't heaven. God doesn't want anyone to suffer--yet we live in the world and it is almost guaranteed we are going to suffer. His own son suffered, and God loved His only son. It is difficult for someone whose mind is fixed in the comforts of the world and especially so for someone who can't believe that there is anything other than this world, but to suffer is proof of God's love for us).


If your child were raped by a rapist, would you say it's OK - simply because of some words written in a holy book?

It wouldn't be a simple, easy thing to go through and something entirely impossible to get through without breaking down without strong faith in God. And it would definitely not be OK. Sin is not ok, but unfortunately it happens.

What do you think are the reason(s) God doesn't intervene and prevent tsunamis, tornadoes and earthquakes from killing loving parents and leaving their children as orphans, people losing their homes or people suffering serious injuries?

Because God doesn't exist to give people here a heaven on earth; His love is not equated to earthly comforts and nothing else. So many people seem to mistake that. To understand this and then ask why should one worship or love a God such as this then is to be fixed with a humanity-centered mindset. To worship and love a God such as this which does not work for a person but that that person works for God, one must have a God-centered mindset. I do not believe this can be accomplished without the help of the Holy Spirit.

So you're saying Christian ministries would serve no purpose if there were no major catastrophes such as hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes. Am I correct?

Not really--Christian ministries exist to bring people to Christ. Unfortunately, many times until someone has something tragic happen in their lives, they do not turn to God because their lives here on earth are going so well. Suffering exists, in my perspective, to restrain our attachments here on earth, to bring sobriety to people's lives. This might be something which will bring much scorn or derision to someone who is attached to this world and who believes there is nothing else.

It is just too bad that when something terrible does happen, sometimes perhaps some people will feel they are abandoned by God or as you posit here that God can't do anything. I understand how it can feel that way and how someone whose faith might not be that strong for it to become weakened and possibly crumble.

I feel this is such a danger for those who adhere to the gospel of prosperity. God's word is a wonderful thing which can bring the only lasting peace to a person's life, but when one reads it with only the idea of God's love and not His judgment, how can faith in such a god withstand tragedy? Then you would be correct: this god can do nothing. And a God who will enact judgment and chastise people is not one to whom most people will cleave to when fixed with themselves foremost in their minds and not God. They do not want this God; they want the one who will bring earthly comfort to their lives.


If God can do anything, he could wire me differently so that I believe he exists.

God predestinated some unto everlasting life and some onto everlasting death. This is one of the harshest doctrines of my faith--it almost seems to verify the idea that God does not love everyone. Yet, it makes sense as to why some people believe in Him and others do not. Before I was converted by the Holy Spirit, I had much the same perspective as you do (the problem of evil in the world with an all-loving and all-powerful God). It just did not add up.

I hope He will give you faith, whether it be in an all-loving God or the harsher one of my faith--whichever one will sustain your faith (they're the same God, He just gives each person their own measure of faith; I feel this is a significant reason for the different denominations). That you're asking these questions seems to mean you are seeking. I don't have all the answers; I am just starting out in my faith so I have many of the same questions as you do. However, I trust in God alone and His word says that He is good, just, and holy. And that I do believe more than any imagination of man.
 
Upvote 0

paul1149

that your faith might rest in the power of God
Site Supporter
Mar 22, 2011
8,463
5,266
NY
✟697,554.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I can figure out only two ways Christians can reconcile the problem of evil.

1) Change their construct of God, so that God either doesn't love everyone or that God can't do anything.

2) Avoid thinking about the logical invalidity. E.g., let's say Jimmy says A plus B equals C and also says C minus B does not equal A; but he fails to perform the algebra which will show not both of those can be true.

If #1 is selected and their construct is changed by saying God doesn't love everyone, then it raises the question of how Christians can reconcile a god that doesn't love us enough to protect us from things like natural disasters, rapists, murderers, etc.

This is an old, well-worn theological dilemma. That's not to say it's not imposing if you can't see beyond it.

The scriptural position is that God is neither weak nor uncaring. He is both able and willing to come to man's aid:
And without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him. -Heb 11.6
The answer is that this present age is a "brief wrinkle in time", that once ironed out, will be long forgotten forevermore. God in His wisdom has allowed history to play out. I can think of one very good reason He has done so: so that every person will have the opportunity to exercise his own free will, making his choice to believe in God or not. He has not abandoned Creation, despite its rejection of Him. He works sublimely, directing it to its final conclusion in a way that does not impinge on our own accountability. Thus, evil has room to exist.

God demonstrated His love toward us by sending His only begotten Son to die in our place. That cleared the up the legal problem of our salvation. He then demonstrated His power by raising Christ from death, our High Priest able to actually effect that salvation.

Evil truly sucks, and this world is sold out to it. But the day is coming when God will wipe every tear from our eyes and make all things new. And indeed, that day is here.
 
Upvote 0