The above proves what the scriptures already plainly says:Hebrews 10
14 For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified.
15 And the Holy Spirit also testifies to us; for after saying,
16 “This is the covenant that I will make with them
After those days, says the LORD:
I will put My laws upon their heart,
And on their mind I will write them,”
He then says,
17 “And their sins and their lawless deeds
I will remember no more.”
Jer 31:31-33
31 “Behold, days are coming,” declares the LORD, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them,” declares the LORD.
LORD all upper case - is always YHWH.
And Hebrews 10 -- says that is the Holy Spirit speaking - and so is in fact YHWH!
1 Cor 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
John 2
23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.
24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
All you had shown was that God is a spirit. That spirit is the Father. Not some third person of Godhead who is a God in his own right.
"God the holy spirit" = not found in the bible.
Of course that happens all the time. It's not like the SDA church holds ecclesiastical power on interpreting the bible as the RCC does, is it?You have chosen to debate the Trinity - the One God in three persons doctrine of the SDA church.
It is one thing to debate the church on that point - that happens all the time. It is another thing not to know that the SDA church affirms One God in three Divine Persons.
I know the SDA church now affirms the 'Trinity'. The church affirms affirms a lot of things today. That doesn't mean they are necessarily biblical. The SDA church in pioneer days are most certainly are not Trinitarians.
“Most of the founders of Seventh-day Adventism would not be able to join the church today if they had to subscribe to the denomination’s Fundamental Beliefs. Most specifically, most would not be able to agree to belief number 2, which deals with the doctrine of the Trinity. For Joseph Bates the Trinity was an unscriptural doctrine, for James White it was that ‘old Trinitiarian absurdity’, and for M E Cornell it was a fruit of the great apostasy, along with such false doctrines as Sunday-keeping and the immortality of the soul”. Ministry magazine. October 1993 p10. Article by George Knight, professor of church history at Andrews University.
“Dear Brother Froom, From my personal knowledge the doctrine of the ‘Trinity-Godhead’, was not taught by Seventh-day Adventists during the early days of my ministry.” Letter from H Cottrell to L E Froom. Oct 16. 1931.
“Replying to your letter of October 13 regarding the doctrine of the Trinity, I will say that Seventh-day Adventists do not and never have accepted the dark, mysterious Catholic doctrine of the Trinity”. Letter from B G Wilkinson to Dr D S Teters. November 3. 1936.
“Dear Brother Froom, Mrs Soper calls to our attention the fact that you are seeking information as to the positions held by our early workers concerning the Trinity, the personality of the Holy Spirit, and the pre-existence of Christ as this may be revealed in their writings. I think we will have to concede that our early workers were not Trinitarians”. Letter from Arthur L White (EGW's son) to L E Froom. Dec 7. 1955.
Forget not your history.
Last edited:
Upvote
0