Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is wrong. Other posters have lol'd at you because it is like saying Jesus wanted to be crucified: it's about as wrong as that would be.
So why probable? Based on what premises? I am not asking about some supposed vague edict of science.
Because maybe the hot spots were created BY the fast movement of the continents?
Assuming they didn't start there, deep sea life is there because slightly less deep sea life developed characteristics that enabled them to survive in deeper water. So they did. As I said, exactly the same as life everywhere else.
"No reason to host any life migrated from outside"? What does that mean? Clearly, life can live there. That's a reason for life to live there.
No, we find life that very closely related to normal deep sea life. The worms are related to other worms, the shrimp are related to other shrimp, the fish are related to other fish. In other words, exactly the sort of thing you'd expect to see if other sea life had migrated there. On the other hand, there's no reason at all for a creator to make all of the organisms at hydrothermal vents look like close relatives of organisms that live in waters away from the vents, is there?
If it presents a problem for evolution, I don't know what it is, and you certainly haven't articulated it in this thread.
You may believe that, but your beliefs about evolution appear to have no connection to evolutionary biologists as it is known to scientists.
I already told you: some of the them developed characteristics that let them live on land, at least a little. So they did. Why wouldn't they?
Fish don't want. Some fish got the ability to survive outside of water, and the ones that occasionally got out had plenty of food. Soon the best survivalists weren't the ones most willing, but the most able, as they all were willing. Then they started developing better lungs, etc. boom you have reptiles.
Wikipedia is your friend:
They didn't want to do anything. That question does not make any more sense if you ask it over and over again.
Yes, I know what "want" means, and I know quite a lot about evolution, and I know that the two have nothing to do with one another. I don't know how you got the bizarre idea that wanting has anything to do with evolution, but your belief has nothing to do with reality.
Your understanding of the world is so foreign to a scientific view that it is difficult to communicate here. Perhaps you should start analyzing your own views. Why do you think an organism has to want something for mutations to happen in its offspring? Do you think wood wants to burn? Do you think trees want to fall down when a hurricane hits? Do you think winds want to blow?
