graciesings
It is so ordered.
- Mar 11, 2013
- 6,058
- 972
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
I was expecting that. Many atheists (and some Christians who don't think things through) believe in this, it's called "Moral relativism."The thing is, I don't believe in black and white morals. I don't believe in good and evil, at least not the same way you do. I think that there is a balance of what is good for yourself and what is good for the community(or tribe might be more accurate) that makes up what we consider good and bad in society today. It is clear that morals are ever changing. I mean just look at the last hundred years and how the treatment of women and non-white people has changed! Clearly they are changing more rapidly than ever before, but I think that has to do with a deeper understanding of how things work. We are actually starting to base our morals off of our understanding of the universe rather than on ancient texts.
The idea is that morals are relative: Either relative to the community/tribe or relative to oneself.
The problem is the sinful nature of man, which I mentioned in the last post... I think you'd agree with me that there's some evil in people? Anyway, the problem is, what if the "best for you" is bad for everyone else? Or what if one thing is best for most of the tribe? If the 75% enslave the 25%, is it right because it works for the most people? 75% are happy... oh, and what if the community/tribe is more prosperous after enslaving that 25%? Then is it a good thing?
See, in my mind, the problem with moral relativism is that with enough effort it can be twisted to make absolutely terrible things "right..."
Upvote
0